Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Andersson, Henrik 2016. Parity and Comparability—a Concern Regarding Chang’s Chaining Argument. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 245.


    Arrhenius, Gustaf 2016. Population Ethics and Different-Number-Based Imprecision. Theoria, Vol. 82, Issue. 2, p. 166.


    HIROSE, IWAO 2013. Aggregation and the Separateness of Persons. Utilitas, Vol. 25, Issue. 02, p. 182.


    CARLSON, ERIK 2008. Higher Values and Non-Archimedean Additivity. Theoria, Vol. 73, Issue. 1, p. 3.


    JENSEN, KARSTEN KLINT 2008. Millian Superiorities and the Repugnant Conclusion. Utilitas, Vol. 20, Issue. 03, p. 279.


    RILEY, JONATHAN 2008. Millian Qualitative Superiorities and Utilitarianism, Part I. Utilitas, Vol. 20, Issue. 03, p. 257.


    ×

Millian Superiorities

  • GUSTAF ARRHENIUS (a1) and WLODEK RABINOWICZ (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0953820805001494
  • Published online: 01 July 2005
Abstract

Suppose one sets up a sequence of less and less valuable objects such that each object in the sequence is only marginally worse than its immediate predecessor. Could one in this way arrive at something that is dramatically inferior to the point of departure? It has been claimed that if there is a radical value difference between the objects at each end of the sequence, then at some point there must be a corresponding radical difference between the adjacent elements. The underlying picture seems to be that a radical gap cannot be scaled by a series of steps, if none of the steps itself is radical. We show that this picture is incorrect on a stronger interpretation of value superiority, but correct on a weaker one. Thus, the conclusion we reach is that, in some sense at least, abrupt breaks in such decreasing sequences cannot be avoided, but that such unavoidable breaks are less drastic than has been suggested. In an appendix written by John Broome and Wlodek Rabinowicz, the distinction between two kinds of value superiority is extended from objects to their attributes.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Utilitas
  • ISSN: 0953-8208
  • EISSN: 1741-6183
  • URL: /core/journals/utilitas
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×