Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Problem of the Second Best: Conceptual Issues

  • Juha Räikkä (a1)
Abstract

In this article I shall undertake a preliminary exploration of the notion of second best. I shall follow a three-step strategy. First, I shall introduce some applications of the theorem of the second best in different fields of philosophy and social sciences. Secondly, I shall make several conceptual distinctions related to the theorem. I aim to show that there are certain theoretical results that are similar but not identical to the theorem of the second best, and that the notion of second best is often used quite loosely. Finally, I shall try to shed some light on the question of how the theorem is description-sensitive. The overall aim of the paper is to pay attention to the generality of the problem of the second best and stress the importance of the theorem in political theory in particular.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The Problem of the Second Best: Conceptual Issues
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The Problem of the Second Best: Conceptual Issues
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The Problem of the Second Best: Conceptual Issues
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Warren J. Samuels and A. Allan Schmid (ed.), Law and Economics: An Institutional Perspective The Hague, 1981

Nicholas Mercudo (ed.), Law and Economics, Dordrecht, 1989

Bruce Talbot Coram , ‘Second Best Theories and the Implications for Institutional Design’, The Theory of Institutional Design, ed. R. Goodin , New York, 1996

Holly S. Goldman , ‘Doing the Best One Can’, Values and Morals, ed. A. I. Goldman and J. Kim , Dordrecht, 1978

Ralph L. Keeney and Howard Raiffa , Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Cambridge, 1993

Paul R. Kleindorfer , Howard C. Kunreuther and Paul J. H. Schoemaker , Decision Sciences: An Integrative Perspective, Cambridge, 1993

Charles E. Larmore , Patterns of Moral Complexity, Cambridge, 1987, esp. ch. 6

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Utilitas
  • ISSN: 0953-8208
  • EISSN: 1741-6183
  • URL: /core/journals/utilitas
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 8 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 126 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.