Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-15T17:52:57.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply to Bykvist and Campbell on Possible Beings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2021

Ingmar Persson*
Affiliation:
Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Ingmar.persson@philosophy.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bykvist, Krister and Campbell, Tim, ‘Persson's Merely Possible Persons’, Utilitas 32 (2020), 479–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Unprefixed page references are to this article.

2 Persson, Ingmar, Inclusive Ethics (Oxford, 2017), p. 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Parfit, Derek, On What Matters (Oxford, 2011)Google Scholar, vol. 2, Appendix J.

4 Persson, Ingmar, Our Identity and the Separability of Persons and Organisms, Dialogue, 38 (1999), 519–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar. But, as I indicated in this article and have contended in other publications, including Inclusive Ethics, ch. 3.1, I do not think a Lockean or any other theory of our identity is correct.

5 Thanks to Bykvist and Campbell for having prodded me to clarify my position on the matters discussed. Thanks also to Suzanne Uniacke and two anonymous reviewers.