Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T10:37:49.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dickens's Talking Dogs: Allegories of Animal Voice in the Victorian Novel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2019


How does the category of the “animal” contribute to the Victorian novel? In the 1840s and 1850s, magazines offered endless short tales of “animal sagacity” that most commonly featured dogs, demonstrating the virtues of the species. An 1858 article in Household Words, “Old Dog Tray,” observes, “Alas! not a day will pass but we can descry human qualities in the brute, and brute qualities in the human being; and, alas again, how often we find a balance of love, fidelity, truth, generosity, on the side of the brute!” In the 1850s and 1860s, the analogies between human and animal behavior upon which these tales depended became a resource to the growing fields of comparative ethology and evolutionary theory—Frances Power Cobbe would suggest in 1877 that dogs had “reflex morality.” Meanwhile, novels from this period increasingly raised questions of the scientific, political, and aesthetic value of claims of resemblance among species. For Charles Dickens, whose work offered a capacious image of the London population, the question of who belongs in a family, a community, or a nation persistently turned to the status of animals. In his work, animal figures mark meditations on the conditions and limits of social inclusion.

Research Article
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


I am grateful to have had the opportunity to present and discuss selections from this piece to audiences at Dickens Universe, NAVSA, MLA, and the University of Sussex Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Speaker Series. The support of a Cornell Society for the Humanities Faculty Research Grant allowed me to complete this essay.


Works Cited

Adams, James Eli. “Gyp's Tale: On Sympathy, Silence, and Realism in Adam Bede.” Dickens Studies Annual 20 (1991): 227–42.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-Coloniality. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Anker, Elizabeth. Fictions of Dignity: Embodying Human Rights in World Literature. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. On Revolution. New York: Viking Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Politics. Volume 2 of The Works of Aristotle, edited by Hutchins, Robert. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, 1952.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy. How Novels Think: The Limits of Individualism from 1719–1900. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Brantlinger, Patrick. “Dickens and the Factories.” Nineteenth Century Literature 26, no. 3 (1971): 270–85.Google Scholar
Brown, Laura. Homeless Dogs and Melancholy Apes: Humans and Other Animals in the Modern Literary Imagination. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
“Cats and Dogs.” Household Words 11, no. 275 (30 June 1855): 516–19.Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power. False Beasts and True: Essays on Natural (and Unnatural) History. London: Ward, Lock, and Tyler, 1875.Google Scholar
Connor, Steven. Dumbstruck: A Cultural History of Ventriloquism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Crane, Walter. Dickens's Dogs; or, The Landseer of Fiction. London: London Society, 1863.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. The Expression of Emotion in Men and Animals, edited by Cain, Joe and Messenger, Sharon. London: Penguin, 2009.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, translated by Massumi, Brian. London: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “The Animal That Therefore I Am (More to Follow),” translated by Wills, David. Critical Inquiry 28, no. 2 (2002): 369418.Google Scholar
Diamond, Cora. “Eating Meat and Eating People.” In The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind, 319–34. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Bleak House, edited by Bradbury, Nicola. 1852–53. London: Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Dombey and Son, edited by Sanders, Andrew. 1846–47. London: Penguin, 2002.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. Hard Times, edited by Flint, Kate. 1854. London: Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar
Donald, Diana. Picturing Animals in Britain, 1750–1850. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Sue, and Kymlicka, Will. “Animals in Political Theory.” In The Oxford Handbook of Animal Studies, edited by Kalof, Linda, DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199927142.013.33 (accessed 2 February 2018).Google Scholar
Esposito, Roberto. Third Person: Politics of Life and Philosophy of the Impersonal, translated by Hanafi, Zakiya. London: Polity, 2012.Google Scholar
Flegel, Monica. Pets and Domesticity in Victorian Literature and Culture: Animality, Queer Relations, and the Victorian Family. New York: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
Frederickson, Kathleen. The Ploy of Instinct: Victorian Sciences of Nature and Sexuality in Liberal Governance. New York: Fordham University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Frow, John. Character and Person. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Furneaux, Holly. Queer Dickens: Erotics, Families, Masculinities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. “The Rise of Fictionality.” In The Novel, edited by Moretti, Franco. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006. 1:336–63.Google Scholar
Gompertz, Louis. Fragments in Defense of Animals, and Essays on Morals, Souls, and Future State, from the Author's Contributions to the Animals’ Friend Periodical. London: W. Horsell, 1852.Google Scholar
Gray, Beryl. The Dog in the Dickensian Imagination. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. A Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.Google Scholar
“Hard Times (Refinished).” In Dickens: The Critical Heritage, edited by Collins, Philip, 309–13. London: Routledge, 1971.Google Scholar
Hearne, Vicki. Adam's Task: Calling Animals by Name. New York: Knopf, 1986.Google Scholar
Howell, Philip. At Home and Astray: The Domestic Dog in Victorian Britain. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Ingham, Patricia. “Speech and Non-Communication in Dombey and Son.” Review of English Studies 30, no. 118 (1979): 144–53.Google Scholar
Jesse, Edward. Anecdotes of Dogs. London: Henry G. Bohn, 1848.Google Scholar
Keenleyside, Heather. Animals and Other People: Literary Forms and Living Beings in the Long Eighteenth Century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Ketabgian, Tamara. “’Melancholy-Mad Elephants’: Affect and the Animal Machine in Hard Times.” Victorian Studies 45, no. 4 (2003): 649–76, esp. 649–50.Google Scholar
Kohn, Eduardo. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Kreilkamp, Ivan. Minor Creatures: Persons, Animals, and the Victorian Novel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Kreilkamp, Ivan. Voice and the Victorian Storyteller. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Kuzniar, Alice. Melancholia's Dog. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Losano, Antonia. “Performing Animals / Performing Humanity.” In Animals in Victorian Literature and Culture, edited by Mazzeno, L. W. and Morrison, R. D., 131–46. London: Palgrave, 2017.Google Scholar
Lupton, Julia Reinhard. “Creature Caliban.” Shakespeare Quarterly 51, no. 1 (2000): 123.Google Scholar
Menely, Tobias. The Animal Claim: Sensibility and the Creaturely Voice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Michie, Elsie. “Horses and Sexual/Social Dominance.” In Victorian Animal Dreams: Representation of Animals in Victorian Literature and Culture, edited by Morse, Deborah and Danahay, Martin, 145–66. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
Miller, John MacNeill. “When Drama Went to the Dogs; or, Staging Otherness in Animal Melodrama.” PMLA 132, no. 3 (2017): 542–56.Google Scholar
“More Dumb Friends.” Household Words 5, no. 109 (24 April 1852): 124–27.Google Scholar
Morritt, Robert D. Echoes from the Greek-Bronze Age: An Anthology of Greek Thought in the Classical Age. Cambridge: Scholars Publishing, 2010.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?Philosophical Review 83, no. 4 (1974): 435–50.Google Scholar
“Old Dog Tray.” Household Words (7 August 1858): 184–89.Google Scholar
[Oliphant, Margaret]. “Charles Dickens.” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine 77 (1855): 451–66.Google Scholar
Pick, Anat. Creaturely Poetics: Animal Vulnerability in Literature and Film. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Picker, John M. Victorian Soundscapes. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Schor, Hilary. Dickens and the Daughter of the House. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Steiner, Gary. Animals and the Limits of Postmodernism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Stockton, Kathryn Bond. The Queer Child, or Growing Sideways in the Twentieth Century. Durham: Duke University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Stout, Daniel. Corporate Romanticism: Liberalism, Justice, and the Novel. New York: Fordham University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Teskey, Gordon. “Colonial Allegories in Paris: The Ideology of Primitive Art.” In Thinking Allegory Otherwise, edited by Machosky, Brenda, 119–41. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Vanden Bossche, Christopher. Reform Acts: Chartism, Social Agency, and the Victorian Novel, 1832–1867. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Velten, Hannah. Beastly London: A History of Animals in the City. London: Reaktion, 2013.Google Scholar
Vermeule, Blakey. Why Do We Care about Literary Characters? Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
West, Anna. Thomas Hardy and the Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Woloch, Alex. The One vs. the Many: Minor Characters and the Space of the Protagonist in the Novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar