Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:59:46.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

INTRODUCTION: BOUNDARIES IN THEORY AND HISTORY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2004

Regenia Gagnier
Affiliation:
University of Exeter

Extract

WHEN ANGELIQUE RICHARDSON AND I began collecting the essays included here, we were interested to see how recent theorists of boundaries like Audre Lorde (hyphenated identities), Gloria Anzaldua (borderlands), Donna Haraway (cyborg), J-F Lyotard (the in-between), or Jacques Derrida (deconstruction) fared in relation to classic theorists of boundaries like Aristotle, Hegel, Marx, and Darwin. We found that while the field of Victorian Studies has absorbed the theory, current practitioners may refer little to past or present theoretical masters. Rather they describe which boundaries were salient to the Victorians and why; when they were permeable and how; and who enforced them and to what ends. The essays in this volume focus on specific boundaries and amass a wealth of detailed knowledge about them. They include the boundaries or boundlessness of London and her suburbs (Parrinder, Cunningham); transnational or deterritorialized boundaries of empire (Spear and Meduri); psychological boundaries (Rylance, Trotter); boundaries between body and soul (Moran) and living and dead (Robson); generic boundaries (Barzilai, Howsam, Small, Toker); boundaries of popular representation between art and politics (Ledger, Livesey); and boundaries between humans, animals, and machines (Joseph and Sussman). The essays here interrogate boundaries historically and pragmatically, with a high tolerance of the in-between or queer, to which I shall return below.

Type
EDITORS' TOPIC: VICTORIAN BOUNDARIES
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson Amanda, and Joseph Valente, eds. 2002. Disciplinarity at the Fin de Siècle. Princeton: Princeton UP
Beer Gillian. 1996. Open Fields: Science in Cultural Encounter. Oxford: Oxford UP
Booth Charles. 1902–1903. Life and Labour of the People of London. 17 vols. London: Macmillan
Connolly William E. 1995. The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis: UP of Minnesota
Connolly William E. The Leverhulme Lectures. University of Exeter. Autumn 2003.
Dupré John. 1993. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge: Harvard UP
Dupré John. 2002. Humans and Other Animals. Oxford: Oxford UP
Dupré John. 1998: “Normal People.” Social Research 65 22148.Google Scholar
Egenis (ESRC Centre for Genomics in Society). “The Meanings of Genomics”: International Seminar 20–22 Nov. 03, University of Exeter. www.exeter.ac.uk/egenis.
Foucault Michel. 1973. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. 1966. New York: Vintage
Gagnier Regenia. 2003Individualism from the New Woman to the Genome: Autonomy and Independence.” Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas 1.1 (January): 10428.Google Scholar
Gagnier Regenia. 1991. Subjectivities: A History of Self-Representation in Britain, 1832–1920. New York: Oxford UP
Hacking Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard UP
Haraway Donna. 1997. Modest_Witness Second Millenium. FemaleMan©MeetsOncoMouseTM: Feminism and Techno-science. New York: Routledge
Hurley Kelly. 1996. The Gothic Body: Sexuality, Materialism, and Degeneration at the Fin De Siecle. Cambridge: Cambridge UP
Keating Peter, ed. 1976. Into Unknown England 1866–1913: Selections from the Social Explorers. Manchester: Manchester UP
Levy Judith. 2002. “Creativity on the Boundary: Ingres' Madame de Senonnes” in Sensuality and Power in Visual Culture. Ed. Raoul Granqvist. Umea Universitet 3449.
Locke John. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. Peter H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford UP
Marx Karl and Friedrich Engels. 1978. The Marx-Engels Reader. 2nd ed. Ed. Robert C. Tucker. New York: Norton
Mayhew Henry. 1985. London Labour and the London Poor. 2 vols. Harmondsworth: Penguin
Mill John Stuart. 1843. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Ethos of Scientific Investigation. London: Longman
Mitchell B. R. 1998. International Historical Statistics: Europe 1750–1993. 4th ed. London: Macmillan Reference
Navarette Susan J. 1998. The Shape of Fear: Horror and the Fin de Siècle Culture of Decadence. Lexington: UP of Kentucky
Richardson Angelique. 2003. Love and Eugenics in the Late Nineteenth Century: Rational Reproduction and the New Woman. Oxford: Oxford UP
Schivelbusch Wolfgang. 1987. The Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley: U of California P
Sheehan James J., and Morton Sosna, eds. 1991. The Boundaries of Humanity: Humans, Animals, Machines. Berkeley: U of California P
Webb Beatrice. 1979. My Apprenticeship. Cambridge: Cambridge UP
Whewell William. 1847. The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences. 2nd ed. 2 vols. London: John W. Parker