Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T20:52:14.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE LONG HISTORY OF “IN SHORT”: MR. MICAWBER, LETTER-WRITERS, AND LITERARY MEN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2005

Laura Rotunno
Laura Rotunno
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State Altoona, The Altoona College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“‘LETTERS!’ … ‘I BELIEVE HE DREAMS IN LETTERS!’” so exclaims Betsey Trotwood of Mr. Micawber, the epistolary aficionado of Charles Dickens's David Copperfield (664; ch. 54). David's aunt Betsey is not the only one to wonder at Micawber's prolific, albeit prolix, nature. His letters have made him a favorite of nineteenth- and twentieth-century readers alike; his “in short” has become one of the most memorable Dickensian tag-lines. But however much attention Micawber's epistolary endeavors garner, this notice fails to raise him to the position of respected writer–the position reserved for the eponymous hero of the novel. In the usual line of thinking, David stands as the ideal literary man while Micawber molders in the world of fantasy and comedy in which J. B. Priestley, James Kincaid, and J. Hillis Miller so securely position him.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , September 2005 , pp. 415 - 433
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The Art of Letter-Writing Simplified; by Precept and Example: Embracing Practical Illustrations of Epistolary Correspondence, of Every Age, in Every Station and Degree, and Under Every Circumstance of Life: with a Wide Variety of Useful and Essential Information. London: Cradock and Co., [c. 1847].
Baumgarten Murray. 1985 “Writing and David Copperfield.” Dickens Studies Annual 14: 39– 59.Google Scholar
Beebe Maurice. 1964. Ivory Towers and Sacred Founts: The Artist as Hero in Fiction from Goethe to Joyce. New York: NYU P
Bottum Joseph. 1995 “The Gentleman's True Name: David Copperfield and the Philosophy of Naming.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 49: 435– 55.Google Scholar
Brown Reverend George. 1790. The English Letter-Writer; Or, The Whole Art of General Correspondence. London: Alexander Hogg
Buckley Jerome H. “The Identity of David Copperfield.” Victorian Literature and Society: Essays Presented to Richard D. Altick. Ed. James R. Kincaid and Albert J. Kuhn. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1984. 225– 39.
Camargo Martin. 1991. Ars Dictaminis, Ars Dictandi. Belgium: Brepols
1801. The Complete Letter-Writer, Containing Familiar-Letters on the Most Common Occasions in Life. Also, a Variety of Elegant Letters for the Direction and Embellishment of Style, on Business, Duty, Amusement, Love, Courtship, Marriage, Friendship, and other Subjects. To which is Prefixed, a Plain and Compendious Grammar of the English Language. London: T. Wilson and R. Spence,
1847 “The Condition of Authors in England, Germany, and France.” Fraser's Magazine 35 (Mar.) 285– 95.
(1843): “Confessions of a Begging Letter-Writer.” Punch 5 68– 71.
Cooke, Reverend Thomas. 1841. The Universal Letter Writer; or, New Art of Polite Correspondence; To Which Are Added the Complete Petitioner, Forms of Law, etc.; Also A New English Grammar. Edinburgh: T. Nelson
Cronin Mark. 1996 “The Rake, The Writer, and The Stranger: Textual Relations Between Pendennis and David Copperfield.” Dickens Studies Annual 24: 215– 40.Google Scholar
Daunton M. J. 1985. Royal Mail: The Post Office Since 1840. London: Athlone P
Dickens Charles. 1850 “The Begging-Letter Writer.” Household Words 1 (18 May): 169– 72.Google Scholar
Dickens Charles. 1857 “Curious Misprint in the Edinburgh Review.” Household Words 16 (1 Aug.): 97– 100.Google Scholar
Dickens Charles. 1981. David Copperfield. 1849–50. Ed. Nina Burgis. Oxford: Clarendon P
Dickens Charles, and Caroline Chisholm. 1850 “A Bundle of Emigrants' Letters.” Household Words 1 (30 Mar.): 19– 24.Google Scholar
Dickens Charles, and W. H. Wills. 1850 “Valentine's Day at the Post-Office.” Household Words 1 (30 Mar.): 6– 12.Google Scholar
Dickens Charles, and W. H. Wills. 1852 “Post-Office Money-Orders.” Household Words 5 (20 Mar.): 1– 5.Google Scholar
Every-Body's Letter Writer, and Complete Guide to Correspondence; Containing a Variety of Elegant Letters & Answers on Love, Courtship, Marriage, Friendship, Business, and Every Branch of Useful and Polite Correspondence. Together with Original Observations on the Art of Letter Writing; The Various Styles of Addressing, Concluding, and Subscribing Letters; and Complete Directions for the Correct Mode of Addressing Persons of Rank. London: T. Richardson, [c. 1830–39].
Favret Mary A. 1993. Romantic Correspondence: Women, Politics and the Fiction of Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge UP
Ferris Norren. 1978 “Circumlocution in David Copperfield.” Dickens Studies Newsletter 9: 43– 46.Google Scholar
Frank Elizabeth. 1816. Classical English Letter-Writer: or, Epistolary Selections; Designed to Improve Young Persons in the Art of Letter-Writing, and in the Principles of Virtue and Piety. Philadelphia: Caleb Richardson
Frank Lawrence. 1984. Charles Dickens and the Romantic Self. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P
Hornbeak Katherine Gee. (1934): The Complete Letter-Writer in English 1568–1800. Smith College Studies in Modern Languages 15 iii–150.Google Scholar
Houston Gail Turley. 1993 “Gender Construction and the Künstlerroman: David Copperfield and Aurora Leigh.” Philological Quarterly 72: 213– 36.Google Scholar
Kaye J. W. 1850 “Pendennis–The Literary Profession.” North British Review 13 (Aug.): 335– 72.Google Scholar
Kellogg David. 1991 “‘My Most Unwilling Hand’: The Mixed Motivations of David Copperfield.” Dickens Studies Annual 20: 57– 73.Google Scholar
Kelly Richard M., ed. 1970. Selections from “Punch's Complete Letter Writer.” The Best of Mr. Punch: The Humorous Writings of Douglas Jerrold. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 148– 98.
Kincaid James R. 1995. Annoying the Victorians. New York: Routledge
Kincaid James R. 1971. Dickens and the Rhetoric of Laughter. Oxford: Clarendon P
Kingdom William. 1842. The Secretary's Assistant; Exhibiting the Various and Most Correct Modes of Superscription, Commencement, and Conclusion of Letters to Persons at Every Degree of Rank, Including the Diplomatic, Clerical, & Judicial Dignitaries: with the Lists of Foreign Ambassadors & Consuls, also the Forms Necessary to be Used in Applications or Petitions to the Queen in Council, Houses of Lords & Commons, Government Offices & Public Companies, with a Table of Precedency and the Abbreviations of Several British & Foreign Orders of Knighthood. 8th ed. London: Whittaker and Co.
(1856): “Letter-Writing and Letter-Writers.” Bentley's Miscellany 40 422– 40.
The London Letter Writer: Containing Elegant Letters on Love, Duty, Friendship, and Business … Written in a Concise and Familiar Style, and Suited to Both Sexes, … to which are Added, the Most Modern Forms of Complimentary Cards. London: Dean and Munday, [c. 1827].
McGowan John P. 1979 “David Copperfield: The Trial of Realism.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 34: 1– 19.Google Scholar
Miller J. Hillis. 1969. Charles Dickens: The World of His Novels. 1958. Bloomington: Indiana UP
Poovey Mary. 1988. Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England. Chicago: U of Chicago P
Priestley J. B. 1966. The English Comic Characters. New York: Dutton
1852 “The Profession of Literature.” Westminster Review 58 (Oct.): 507– 31.
(1841): “Punch's New General Letter-Writer.” Punch 1 160.
Richardson Samuel. 1928. Familiar Letters on Important Occasions. 1741. Ed. J. Isaacs. London: Routledge and Sons
Roberts William. 1843. History of Letter-Writing from the Earliest Period to the Fifth Century. London: William Pickering
Robinson Howard. 1970. The British Post Office: A History. 1948. Westport: Greenwood P
(1848): “The Royal Complete Letter Writer.” Punch 15 198.
Seton George. 1870. Gossip about Letters and Letter-Writers. Edinburgh: Edmonston and Douglas
Shires Linda M. 1996. “Literary Careers, Death, and the Body Politics of David Copperfield.” Dickens Refigured: Bodies, Desires and Other Histories. Ed. John Schad. Manchester: Manchester UP, 117– 35.
Simon Irène. 1992 “David Copperfield: A Künstlerroman?” Review of English Studies 43: 40– 56.Google Scholar
Southey Caroline Bowles. 1822 “Thoughts on Letter-Writing.” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine 60.11 (Mar.): 301– 04.Google Scholar
Sroka Kenneth M. 1993 “Dickens's Metafiction: Readers and Writers in Oliver Twist, David Copperfield, and Our Mutual Friend.” Dickens Studies Annual 22: 35– 66.Google Scholar
Stonehouse J. H., ed. 1935. Reprints of the Catalogues of the Libraries of Charles Dickens and W. M. Thackeray. London: Piccadilly Fountain P
Storey Graham, and K. J. Fielding, eds. 1981. The Pilgrim Edition of The Letters of Charles Dickens: 1847–1849. Vol. 5. Oxford: Clarendon P
Sturrock John. 1993. The Language of Autobiography: Studies in the First Person Singular. Cambridge: Cambridge UP
Tick Stanley. 1991 “Dickens, Dickens, Micawber … and Bakhtin.” Victorian Newsletter 79: 34– 37.Google Scholar
Tillotson Kathleen, ed. 1977. The Pilgrim Edition of The Letters of Charles Dickens: 1844–1846. Vol. 4. Oxford: Clarendon P
1821. The Universal Letter Writer; or, Complete Art of Polite Correspondence: Containing a Course of Interesting Letters on the Most Important and Interesting Subjects, which May Serve as Copies for Inditing Letters on the Various Occurrences in Life; to which is Prefixed, Directions for Writing Letters. Haddington: James Miller,
Vincent David. 1989. Literacy and Popular Culture: England 1750–1914. Cambridge, Cambridge UP,
Welsh Alexander. 1987. From Copyright to Copperfield: The Identity of Dickens. Cambridge: Harvard UP
Zaczek Barbara Maria. 1997. Censored Sentiments: Letters and Censorship in Epistolary Novels and Conduct Materials. Newark: U of Delaware P