Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zklqj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-02T20:12:22.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Basis for Bentazon Selectivity in Navy Bean, Cocklebur, and Black Nightshade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Martin D. Mahoney  and
Donald Penner
Martin D. Mahoney
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci. Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci. Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The trifoliate leaf of tolerant navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) retained less bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-(4)3H-one 2,2-dioxide] from foliar applications than the unifoliate leaf, or the leaves from susceptible cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr.) and moderately susceptible black nightshade (Solarium nigrum L.) seedlings. The 14C from 14C-bentazon applied to the foliage of black nightshade moved throughout the entire plant. In cocklebur, the 14C moved throughout the treated leaf, whereas, in the trifoliate leaf of navy bean, very little acropetal movement occurred from the site of application. However, in the unifoliate leaf of navy bean, acropetal and basipetal movement of 14C from the leaf was observed. The species differed in the 14C-metabolites formed from 14C-bentazon 1 and 5 days after treatment. The rapid metabolism of bentazon in the trifoliate leaf of navy bean appears to be related to tolerance.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , July 1975 , pp. 272 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Andersen, R.N., Lueschen, W.E., Warnes, D.D., and Nelson, W.E. 1974. Controlling broadleaf weeds in soybeans with bentazon in Minnesota. Weed. Sci. 22:136–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Fenster, C.R. and Wicks, G.A. 1972. Weed control in field beans in Nebraska. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 27:35–37.Google Scholar
3. Mahoney, M.D. and Penner, D. 1975. Bentazon translocation and metabolism in soybean and navy bean. Weed Sci. (This Issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Penner, D. 1972. Selectivity of bentazon between soybean and Canada thistle. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 27:50.Google Scholar
5. Wax, L.M., Bernard, R.L., and Hayes, R.M. 1972. Response of soybean varieties to bentazon. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 27:28.Google Scholar
6. Wax, L.M., Bernard, R.L., and Hayes, R.M. 1974. Response of soybean cultivars to bentazon, bromoxynil, chloroxuron, and 2,4-DB. Weed Sci. 22:35–41.Google Scholar
7. Weber, W.J., Christopher, L., Fulner, J., Haniford, D., and Kessler, E. 1972. Efficacy of bentazon on burcucumber and certain serious weeds in Indiana. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 27:29.Google Scholar