Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-5dd2w Total loading time: 0.235 Render date: 2022-05-28T11:56:46.775Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Article contents

Effect of Fertilizer Nitrogen on Weed Emergence and Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Amy E. Sweeney
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Karen A. Renner*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Carrie Laboski
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Adam Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: renner@msu.edu

Abstract

The timing of nitrogen (N) fertilizer application may influence germination, emergence, and competitiveness of weeds. Research was conducted to determine the influence of total inorganic soil N (Nit) on the germination, emergence, and growth of five weed species. In a greenhouse experiment, seed of five weed species were exposed to four levels of N, and seed germination was measured. In the field, urea ammonium nitrate (UAN 28%) was applied at multiple rates at three spring timings, and Nit, weed emergence, and growth were measured for 21 to 35 d after application (DAA). Germination of the four dicotyledonous and single grass species was not stimulated by 450 ppmw of N compared with the untreated control. In the field, Nit of 112 or 168 kg N ha−1, measured at 7 and 21 DAA, was always greater than Nit in the untreated control. The duration of the available N pulse in the upper 8 cm of soil was dependent on N application rate and timing. At 8 to 16 cm of soil depth, Nit was greater when 168 kg N ha−1 was applied compared with no N at 21 and 35 DAA in 2004. Emergence of common lambsquarters increased as N application rate increased for each application date in 2003, but not in 2004. Emergence of ladysthumb increased with N application rate for the April 15, 2003, date; emergence of giant foxtail increased with N application rate for the April 6, 2004, date. Weed biomass was always greater when 168 kg N ha−1 was applied compared with no N, and at four of six N application dates, when 112 kg N ha−1 was applied. This research shows that spring N fertilizer applications increase Nit and weed growth, but the influence of N on weed emergence is dependent on the weed species, seed source, and environmental conditions.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. L., Tanaka, D. L., Black, A. L., and Schweizer, E. E. 1998. Weed community and species response to crop rotation, tillage, and nitrogen fertility. Weed Technol. 12:531536.Google Scholar
Andersson, T. N. and Milberg, P. 1998. Weed flora and the relative importance of site, crop, crop rotation, and nitrogen. Weed Sci. 46:3038.Google Scholar
Armstrong, M. J., Milford, G. F. J., Pocock, T. O., Last, P. J., and Day, W. 1986. The dynamics of nitrogen uptake and its remobilization during the growth of sugar beet. J. Agric. Sci. 107:145154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barberi, P., Silvestri, N., and Bonari, E. 1997. Weed communities of winter wheat as influenced by input level and rotation. Weed Res. 37:301313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, C. C. and Baskin, J. M. 1998. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. New York Academic.Google Scholar
Benech–Arnold, R. L., Sánchez, R. A., Forcella, F., Kruk, B. C., and Ghersa, C. M. 2000. Environmental control of dormancy in weed seed banks in soil. Field Crops Res. 67:105122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benvenuti, S., Macchia, M., and Miele, S. 2001. Quantitative analysis of emergence of seedlings from buried weed seeds with increasing soil depth. Weed Sci. 49:528535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, B. D., Murphy, S. D., and Swanton, C. J. 2003. From seed to seedling. Pages 8199. in Booth, B. D., Murphy, S. D., and Swanton, C. J. Weed Ecology in Natural and Agricultural Ecosystems. Cambridge, MA CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. R. 1998. Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region. North Central Regional Research. Columbia, MO Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station (Revised), SB1001, Publication 221.Google Scholar
Cairns, A. L. P. and de Villiers, O. T. 1986. Breaking dormancy of Avena fatua L. seed by treatment with ammonia. Weed Res. 26:191198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, J. N., Jensen, M. E., and Bosma, S. M. 1974. Determining nitrogen fertilizer needs for sugarbeets from residual soil nitrate and mineralizable nitrogen. Agron. J. 66:319323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cathcart, R. J. and Swanton, C. J. 2003. Nitrogen management will influence threshold values of green foxtail (Setaria viridis) in corn. Weed Sci. 51:975986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, M. A., Butera, D. L., and Hughs, J. A. 1983. Seed dormancy in red rice, III: response to nitrite, nitrate, and ammonium ions. Plant Physiol. 73:381384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dale, T. M. and Renner, K. A. 2005. Timing of postemergence micro-rate applications based on growing degree days in sugar beet. J. Sugar Beet Res. 42:87102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derksen, D. A., Thomas, A. G., Lafond, G. P., Loeppky, H. A., and Swanton, C. J. 1995. Impact of post-emergence herbicides on weed community diversity within conservation-tillage systems. Weed Res. 35:311320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dexter, A. G. 1994. History of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) herbicide rate reduction in North Dakota and Minnesota. Weed Technol. 8:334337.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M. 1995. Approaches for improving crop competitiveness through the manipulation of fertilization strategies. Weed Sci. 43:491497.Google Scholar
Dotzenko, A. D., Ozkan, M., and Storer, K. R. 1969. Influence of crop sequence, nitrogen fertilizer and herbicides on weed seed populations in sugar beet fields. Agron. J. 61:3437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. 1993. Nutrition. Pages 239250. in Cooke, D. A. and Scott, R. K. The Sugar Beet Crop: Science into Practice. New York Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egley, G. H. and Duke, S. O. 1985. Physiology of weed seed dormancy and germination. Pages 2764. in. Weed Physiology: Reproduction and Ecophysiology, Volume 1. Boca Raton, FL CRC.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R. S. and Slife, F. W. 1978. Effects of field applications of nitrate on weed seed germination and dormancy. Weed Sci. 26:594596.Google Scholar
Forcella, F., Wilson, R. G., Dekker, J., et al. 1997. Weed seed bank emergence across the Corn Belt. Weed Sci. 45:6776.Google Scholar
Freyman, S., Kowalenko, C. G., and Hall, J. W. 1989. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium on weed emergence and subsequent weed communities in south coastal British Columbia. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69:10011010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, R. S. and Cardina, J. 1998. Phytochrome-mediated Amaranthus germination, II: development of very low fluence sensitivity. Weed Sci. 46:5358.Google Scholar
Hartmann, K. M., Goetz, S., Market, R., Kaufmann, T., and Schneider, K. 2003. Photocontrol of weed germination: lightless tillage and variable memory of the seedbank. Asp. Appl. Biol. 69:237246.Google Scholar
Hoeft, R. G., Nafziger, E. D., Johnson, R. R., and Aldrich, S. R. 2000. Modern Corn and Soybean Production. Champaign, IL MCSP. 353.Google Scholar
Hurtt, W. and Taylorson, R. B. 1986. Chemical manipulation of weed emergence. Weed Res. 26:259267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeney, D. R. and Nelson, D. W. 1982. Nitrogen-inorganic forms. Pages 643698. in Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., and Keeney, D. R. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Agronomy Monograph 9. 2nd ed. Madison, WI American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Myers, M. W., Curran, W. S., VanGessel, M. J., Calvin, D. D., Mortensen, D. A., Majek, B. A., Karsten, H. D., and Roth, G. W. 2004. Predicting weed emergence for eight annual species in the northeastern United States. Weed Sci. 52:913919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paolini, R., Principi, M., Froud-Williams, R. J., Del Puglia, S., and Binacardi, E. 1999. Competition between sugarbeet and Sinapis arvensis and Chenopodium album, as affected by timing of nitrogen fertilization. Weed Res. 39:425440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyšek, P. and Lepš, J. 1991. Response of a weed community to nitrogen fertilization: a multivariate analysis. J. Veg. Sci. 2:237244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sardi, K. and Beres, I. 1996. Effects of fertilizer salts on the germination of corn, winter wheat, and their common weed species. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 27:12271235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimpf, D. J. and Palmblad, I. G. 1980. Germination response of weed seeds to soil nitrate and ammonium with and without stimulated overwintering. Weed Sci. 28:190193.Google Scholar
Sexsmith, J. J. and Pittman, U. J. 1963. Effect of nitrogen fertilizers on germination and stand of wild oats. Weeds. 11:99101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbauer, G. P. and Grigsby, B. 1957. Interaction of temperature, light, and moistening agent in the germination of weed seeds. Weeds. 5:175182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, F. C., Légère, A., Simard, R. R., Angers, D. A., Pageau, D., and Lafond, J. 1997. Weed species diversity in spring barley varies with crop rotation and tillage, but not with nutrient source. Weed Sci. 45:798806.Google Scholar
Teyker, R. H., Hoelzer, H. D., and Liebl, R. A. 1991. Maize and pigweed response to nitrogen supply and form. Plant and Soil. 135:287292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warncke, D., Dahl, J., Jacobs, L., and Laboski, C. 2004. Nutrient recommendations for field crops in Michigan. East Lansing, MI Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E2904. 32.Google Scholar
48
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Effect of Fertilizer Nitrogen on Weed Emergence and Growth
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Effect of Fertilizer Nitrogen on Weed Emergence and Growth
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Effect of Fertilizer Nitrogen on Weed Emergence and Growth
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *