Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T05:30:02.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Soybean (Glycine max) Interference on the Canopy Architecture of Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), Jimsonweed (Datura stramonium), and Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Emilie E. Regnier  and
Edward W. Stoller
Emilie E. Regnier
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, and Plant Physiol., U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv. and Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Edward W. Stoller
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, and Plant Physiol., U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv. and Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Common cocklebur, jimsonweed, and velvetleaf were grown with soybeans in the field to determine how soybean interference affects weed canopy architecture. Common cocklebur had more leaves within the soybean canopy than jimsonweed or velvetleaf. At the end of the season, common cocklebur leaf area was distributed evenly below and above the top of the soybean canopy, while nearly all the jimsonweed and velvetleaf leaf area was above the soybean canopy. Common cocklebur exhibited more shade tolerance than jimsonweed or velvetleaf by also maintaining leaves in the shade within the soybean canopy. Differences among these weeds in leaf distribution within the soybean canopy were not related to differences in abscission of the lower leaves but to a differential response of lower axillary buds to soybean shading. Growth from lower axillary buds in jimsonweed and velvetleaf was strongly inhibited by soybean interference, but interference had little effect on lower axillary bud growth in common cocklebur. Axillary bud growth in the lower canopies of both common cocklebur and soybeans, and their similarity in height, caused these plants to compete for the same aboveground niche. However, common cocklebur had more extensive axillary growth along the lower stem than soybeans, which may allow it to compete for resources in this niche more aggressively than soybeans. Velvetleaf and jimsonweed did not share the same aboveground niche with soybeans due to the placement of their leaves above rather than within the soybean canopy. The lower branching characteristics and apparent shade tolerance of common cocklebur may be important factors in the superior competitive ability with soybeans compared to jimsonweed and velvetleaf.

Keywords

Common cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. ♯3 XANSTjimsonweed, Datura stramonium L. ♯ DATSTsoybean, Glycine max L. Merrvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medic. ♯ ABUTHBranchingleaf abscissionleaf arealeaf distributionlight profileshade toleranceXANSTDATSTABUTH
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , March 1989 , pp. 187 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Björkman, O. 1981. Responses to different quantum flux density. Encycl. Plant Phys., New Ser. 120:57–107.Google Scholar
2. Charles-Edwards, D. A. and Beech, D. F. 1984. On the ordered development of plants. 3. Branching by the grain legume Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (Guar). Ann. Bot. 54:673–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Decoteau, D. R. and Craker, L. E. 1983. Abscission: quantification of light control. Plant Physiol. 73:450–451.Google Scholar
4. Felton, W. L. 1976. The influence of row spacing and plant population on the effect of weed competition in soybeans. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. and Anim. Husb. 16:926–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Geddes, R. D., Scott, H. D., and Oliver, L. R. 1979. Growth and water use by common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) and soybeans (Glycine max) under field conditions. Weed Sci. 27:206–211.Google Scholar
6. Heindl, J. C. and Brun, W. A. 1983. Light and shade effects on abscission and 14C-photoassimilate partitioning among reproductive structures in soybean. Plant Physiol. 73:434–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Higgins, R. A., Staniforth, D. W., and Pedigo, L. P. 1984. Effects of weed density and defoliated or undefoliated soybeans (Glycine max) on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) development. Weed Sci. 32:511–519.Google Scholar
8. Kasperbauer, M. J. 1971. Spectral distribution of light in a tobacco canopy and effects of end-of-day light quality on growth and development. Plant Physiol. 47:775–778.Google Scholar
9. Kemp, D. R., Auld, B. A., and Medd, R. W. 1983. Does optimizing plant arrangements reduce interference or improve the utilization of space? Agric. Systems. 12:31–36.Google Scholar
10. Munger, P. H., Chandler, J. M., Cothren, J. T., and Hons, F. M. 1987. Soybean (Glycine max) — velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interspecific competition. Weed Sci. 35:647–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Murphy, T. R. and Gossett, B. J. 1981. Influence of shading by soybeans (Glycine max) on weed suppression. Weed Sci. 29:610–615.Google Scholar
12. Ross, M. A. and Harper, J. L. 1972. Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment. J. Ecol. 60:77–88.Google Scholar
13. Schou, J. B., Jeffers, D. L., and Streeter, J. G. 1978. Effects of reflectors, black boards, or shades applied at different stages of plant development on yield of soybeans. Crop Sci. 18:29–34.Google Scholar
14. Schwank, O., Blum, H., and Nosberger, J. 1986. The influence of irradiance distribution on the growth of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) in differently managed canopies of permanent grassland. Ann. Bot. 37:273–281.Google Scholar
15. Smith, H. 1982. Light quality, photoreception, and plant strategy. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33:481–518.Google Scholar
16. Sterling, T. M. and Putnam, A. R. 1987. Possible role of glandular trichome exudates in interference by velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 35:308–313.Google Scholar
17. Stivers, R. K. and Swearingen, M. L. 1980. Soybean yield compensation with different plant populations and missing plant patterns. Agron. J. 72:98–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Stoller, E. W., Harrison, S. K., Wax, L. M., Regnier, E. E., and Nafziger, E. D. 1987. Weed interference in soybeans (Glycine max) Rev. Weed Sci. 3:155–181.Google Scholar
19. Stoller, E. W. and Woolley, J. T. 1985. Competition for light by broadleaf weeds in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 33: 199–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Thomas, H. and Stoddart, J. L. 1980. Leaf senescence. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31:83–111.Google Scholar
21. Tucker, D. J. and Mansfield, T. A. 1972. Effects of light quality on apical dominance in Xanthium strumarium and associated changes in endogenous levels of abscisic acid and cytokinins. Planta 102:140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Woledge, J. 1986. The effect of age and shade on the photosynthesis of white clover leaves. Ann. Bot. 57:257–262.Google Scholar