Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T17:12:37.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A History of Weed Control in the United States and Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Abstract

Available literature indicates that relatively few agricultural leaders and farmers became interested in weeds as a problem before 1200 A.D. or even 1500 A.D. For many centuries, weed control was mostly incidental to tillage for seedbed preparation and growing of crops and to growing and cutting or pasturing of thickly planted crops. Occasional references in literature previous to 1900 mentioned use of mechanical devices and a few inorganic herbicides specifically for weed control.

State weed laws directed at control of plant diseases were enacted during 1721 to 1766, but weed and seed laws involving weeds directly were not enacted until 100 to 200 years later. Only a few extension type publications on weeds were issued in the United States and Canada between 1860 and 1900. There was a rapid increase in such publications after 1900. Research with inorganic chemicals as herbicides was begun in the 1890's in Europe and in a few states and provinces, and was increased at a rapid pace until the early 1940's. New developments in mechanical and biological control of weeds increased steadily during the same period. However, weed control remained a relatively minor phase of agronomy, botany, horticulture, agricultural engineering, and plant physiology until the early 1950's.

About 10 years after the discovery of (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D) in 1942–1944, the much increased interest of scientists, federal and state governments, industrial companies, and the general public had begun to bear fruit. The word “weed” or “weeds” began to appear in the titles of college courses and extension specialists. Weed conferences had been organized in six regions of the United States and Canada and in 10 states.

The first meeting of the Weed Science Society of America was held in 1956 and Weed Science was adopted as its official journal. The number of herbicides in general use in the United States and Canada increased from 15 in 1940 to 25 in 1950, and to 100 in 1969. The total support for weed research in 1962 in the United States was six times that in 1950. The number of full-time research and extension workers or their equivalents in part-time workers had increased 20-fold and 13-fold, respectively, over the number in 1940.

The rate of advancement in the art and science of weed control has increased so rapidly that the progress in each of the recent brief periods 1941 to 1968, 1901 to 1940, and 1800 to 1900 is considered greater than that in all previous periods, beginning about 6000 B.C.

Type
WSSA 50th Anniversary
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adams, G. E. 1909. Weeds, their eradication and control. Rhode Island Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 133:61.Google Scholar
2. Aldous, R. E. 1930. Relation of organic food reserves to growth of some Kansas plants. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 22:385392. 37 Kennedy, President John F. 1963. Statement in address at Laramie, Wyoming, September 25, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Allard, R. W., Ennis, W. B. Jr., Derose, H. R., and Weaver, R. J. 1946. The action of isopropyl phenyl carbamate upon plants. Bot. Gaz. 107:589596.Google Scholar
4. Arber, Agnes. 1920. Water Plants. Hafner Publishing Co., New York. 436 p.Google Scholar
5. Arle, H. F. and Hamilton, K. C. 1957. Chemical control of weeds in cotton. Arizona Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 283. 8 p.Google Scholar
6. Arny, A. C. 1932. Variations in the organic reserves in underground parts of five perennial weeds from late April to November. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 84. 28 p.Google Scholar
7. Arthur, J. C. 1894. Wild or prickly lettuce. Purdue Univ. Exp. Sta. Bull. 52:81114.Google Scholar
8. Aslander, Alfred. 1926. Chlorates as plant poisons. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 18:11011102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Aslander, Alfred. 1927. Sulfuric acid as a weed spray. J. Agr. Res. 34:10651091.Google Scholar
10. Aslander, Alfred. 1928. Experiments on eradication of Canada thistle with chlorates and other herbicides. J. Agr. Res. 36:915934.Google Scholar
11. Bakke, A. L., Gaessler, W. G., and Loomis, W. E. 1939. Relation of root reserves to control of European bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 254:113144.Google Scholar
12. Ball, Carlton. 1901. Johnson Grass: Report of investigations during the season of 1901. U. S. Dep. Agr. Bur. Plant Ind. Bull. 11. 24 p.Google Scholar
13. Ball, W. E. and French, O. C. 1935. Sulfuric acid for control of weeds. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 596. 29 p.Google Scholar
14. Barr, Harold. 1947. Flame cultivation. Louisiana Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 415. 15 p.Google Scholar
15. Barrons, Keith C. and Grigsby, Buford H. 1946. The control of weeds in canning peas. Michigan Agr. Exp. Sta. Quart. Bull. 28:145156.Google Scholar
16. Becker, C. F. and Costel, G. L. 1958. Equipment for the application of granular herbicides. Wyoming Agr. Exp. Sta. Mimeo Circ. 102. 18 p.Google Scholar
17. Bennett, F. D. 1966. Investigations on insects attacking the aquatic ferns (Salvinia spp.) in Trinidad and northern South America. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 19:497504.Google Scholar
18. Bioletti, Frederick T. 1911. The extermination of wild morning glory. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 69. 12 p.Google Scholar
19. Blackburn, Robert D. and Andres, L. A. 1968. The snail, the mermaid and the flea beetle. U. S. Dep. Agr. Yearbook of Agr., p. 229234. Gov't Printing Off., Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
20. Blackman, G. E. 1948. Recent developments in the control of weeds. J. Royal Hort. Sci. 73:134144.Google Scholar
21. Bolley, H. L. 1901. Studies upon weeds in 1900. North Dakota Agr. Exp. Sta. Annu. Rep. 11:4856.Google Scholar
22. Bolley, H. L. 1908. Weeds and methods of eradication. Weed control by means of chemical sprays. North Dakota Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 80:511574.Google Scholar
23. Bondarenko, D. D. and Dowler, C. D. 1958. Herbicides in soybeans. Proc. No. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 15:109110.Google Scholar
24. Boyd, George W. and Corkins, C. L. 1941. Control of noxious weeds by burning and how to make a burner. Wyoming Agr. Ext. Serv. Circ. 75. 16 p.Google Scholar
25. Brown, E. O. and Porter, R. H. 1942. Viability and germination of seeds of Convolvulus arvensis L. and other perennial weeds. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 294:473504.Google Scholar
26. Bruns, V. F. 1965. The effects of fresh water storage on the germination of certain weed seeds. Weeds 13:3840.Google Scholar
27. Bruns, V. F. and Rasmussen, L. W. 1953. The effects of freshwater storage on the germination of certain weed seeds. Part I. White top, Russian knapweed, Canada thistle, morning glory, and poverty weed. Weeds 2:138147.Google Scholar
28. Bruns, V. F., Hodgson, J. M., Arle, H. F., and Timmons, F. L. 1955. The use of aromatic solvents for control of submersed aquatic weeds in irrigation channels. U. S. Dep. Agr. Circ. 971. 33 p.Google Scholar
29. Bucha, H. C. and Todd, C. W. 1951. 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, a new herbicide. Science 114:493494.Google Scholar
30. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 1922. Weeds of California and methods of control. California Dep. Agr. Monthly Bull., Vol. IX, Nos. 2–3. 360 p.Google Scholar
31. Call, L. E. and Getty, R. E. 1923. The eradication of bindweed. Kansas Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 101. 18 p.Google Scholar
32. Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the natural control of ragwort (Senecio jacobaea L.). J. Ecol. 23:265322.Google Scholar
33. Cates, J. S. 1911. Eradication of quackgrass. U. S. Dep. Agr. Farmers Bull. 464. 11 p.Google Scholar
34. Cates, J. S. and Cox, H. R. 1912. The weed factor in the cultivation of corn. U. S. Dep. Agr. Bur. Plant Ind. Bull. 257. 35 p.Google Scholar
35. Chater, E. H. 1931. A contribution to the natural control of gorse. Bull. Entomol. Res. 22:225235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Chepil, W. S. 1946. Germination of weed seeds, longevity, periodicity of germination and vitality of seeds in cultivated soil. Sci. Agr. 26:307346.Google Scholar
37. Chimits, Pierre. 1955. Tilapia and its culture. Food and Agr. Org. Fisheries Bull. VIII(2):133.Google Scholar
38. Clark, G. H. and Fletcher, James. 1906. Farm weeds of Canada. Canada Dep. Agr. Seed Branch, Ottawa. 103 p.Google Scholar
39. Clark, George H. and Fletcher, James. 1909. Farm weeds of Canada. 2nd Ed. Government Printing Bur., Ottawa. 192 p.Google Scholar
40. Corkins, C. L. and Elledge, A. B. 1940. Continuous burning to eradicate noxious weeds. The Reclam. Era 30:140142.Google Scholar
41. Cox, H. R. 1909. Eradication of bindweed or morning glory. U. S. Dep. Agr. Farmers Bull. 368. 19 p.Google Scholar
42. Crafts, A. S. 1935. Factors affecting the effectiveness of sodium chlorate as an herbicide. Hilgardia 9:437457.Google Scholar
43. Crafts, A. S. 1945. A new herbicide, 2,4-dinitro-6-secondary butyl phenol. Science 101:417418.Google Scholar
44. Crafts, A. S. and Kennedy, P. B. 1930. The physiology of Convolvulus arvensis in relation to its control by chemical sprays. Plant Physiol. 5:329344.Google Scholar
45. Crafts, A. S. and Harvey, W. A. 1949. Weed control. Advances in Agron. 1:289320.Google Scholar
46. Crafts, A. S. and Raynor, R. N. 1936. The herbicidal properties of boron compounds. Hilgardia 10:343374.Google Scholar
47. Coulter, L. L. 1954. Silvex, a new selective herbicide. Down to Earth (Spring). p. 1820.Google Scholar
48. Currie, G. A. and Fyfe, R. V. 1938. Fate of certain European insects introduced into Australia. Australia Council Sci. and Ind. Res. J. 11:289301.Google Scholar
49. Dana, Malcolm N., Skroch, Walter, and Boone, Donald M. 1965. Granular herbicides for cranberry bogs. Weeds 13:57.Google Scholar
50. Darlington, H. T. 1951. The seventy-year period of Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. Amer. J. Bot. 38:379381.Google Scholar
51. Darrow, Robert A., McCully, Wayne G., and Hughes, Eugene E. 1959. Woody plant and grass responses to fenuron and chlorinated benzoic acids. Proc. No. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 12:143147.Google Scholar
52. Davidson, Harold and Reis, S. K. 1962. Weed control studies with nursery crops. Michigan Agr. Exp. Sta. Quar. Bull. 44:751758.Google Scholar
53. Derose, H. R. 1951. Crabgrass inhibition with O-isopropyl N-(3-chlorophenyl) carbamate. Agron. J. 43:139142.Google Scholar
54. Dewey, Lester H. 1895. Weeds and how to kill them. U. S. Dep. Agr. Farmers Bull. 28. 31 p.Google Scholar
55. Dodd, A. P. 1927. The biological control of prickly pear in Australia. Australia Council Sci. and Ind. Res. Bull. 34. 44 p.Google Scholar
56. Dodds, D. R. 1920. Garlic and wild onions. West Virginia Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 253. 4 p.Google Scholar
57. Domagalla, B. P. 1926. Treatment of algae and weeds in lakes at Madison, Wisconsin. Eng. News-Record 97:950954.Google Scholar
58. DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY. 1950. TCA, its range of usefulness. Down to Earth (Summer). p. 810.Google Scholar
59. Duvel, J. W. T. 1905. The viability of buried seed. U. S. Dep. Agr. Bur. Plant Ind. Bull. 83. 22 p.Google Scholar
60. Eaton, A. J. and Edson, H. A. 1910. Practical method of killing witch grass (quackgrass). Vermont Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 149:417447.Google Scholar
61. Edwards, F. E. 1964. History and progress of flame cultivation. Proc. Annu. Symp., Research on Flame Weed Contr. 1:36.Google Scholar
62. Fletcher, James. 1897. The worst Canadian weeds. Canada Dep. Agr. Bull. 28. 39 p.Google Scholar
63. Franzke, C. J. and Hume, A. N. 1936. Field bindweed. South Dakota Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 305. 51 p.Google Scholar
64. Frazier, John C. 1943. Nature and rate of development of the root system of Convolvulus arvensis. Bot. Gaz. 104:417425.Google Scholar
65. Frazier, John C. 1948. Principal noxious perennial weeds of Kansas with emphasis in relation to control. Kansas Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 331. 45 p.Google Scholar
66. Freed, Virgil H. and Bierman, H. E. 1950. IPC, a new weed killer. Oregon Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 483. 8 p.Google Scholar
67. Fulling, Edmund H. 1943. Plant life and the law of man. IV. Barberry, currant, gooseberry, and cedar control. Bot. Rev. 9:483592.Google Scholar
68. Gadd, Pehr Adrian. 1777. Weeds in our Swedish fields and how they can be best eradicated, Chap. 14, p. 162187. In Systematic Introduction on Swedish Land Husbandry. Vol. III. Swedish Acad. Sci., Stockholm.Google Scholar
69. Gaetner, Erika E. 1950. Studies of seed germination, seed identification and host relationships on dodders. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Memoir 294. 56 p.Google Scholar
70. Georgia, Ada E. 1927. Manual of Weeds. Macmillan Co., N. Y. 593 p.Google Scholar
71. Gittins, Bert S. 1959. Land of plenty. 2nd Ed. Farm Equipment Inst., Chicago, Il. 63 p.Google Scholar
72. Goss, W. L. 1924. The vitality of buried seed. J. Agr. Res. 29:349362.Google Scholar
73. Grandfield, C. O. 1930. The relation of organic food reserves to the effect of cutting pasture weeds at different stages of growth. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 22:709713.Google Scholar
74. Gray, G. P. 1917. Spraying for the control of wild morning glory in the fog belt. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 168. 8 p.Google Scholar
75. Grigsby, B. H. 1946. Oil sprays for the control of weeds in carrots and related crops. Michigan Agr. Exp. Sta. Quart. Bull. 28:201207.Google Scholar
76. Grigsby, B. H. and Barrons, K. C. 1945. Some new ideas in weed control. Michigan Agr. Exp. Sta. Quart. Bull. 27:301309.Google Scholar
77. Groh, Herbert. 1922. A survey of weed control and investigation in Canada. Sci. Agr. 3:415420.Google Scholar
78. Gysin, H. 1960. The role of chemical research in developing selective weed control practices. Weeds 8:541555.Google Scholar
79. Halsted, D. Byron. 1889. What are the worst weeds in New Jersey. New Jersey Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 52. 15 p.Google Scholar
80. Hamilton, Robert H. and Aldrich, Richard J. 1952. The use of certain esters of trichlorobenzoic acids for preemergence weed control. Proc. No. East. Weed Contr. Conf. 19:6573.Google Scholar
81. Hamner, C. L. and Tukey, H. B. 1944. Herbicidal action of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and trichlorophenoxyacetic acid on bindweed. Science 100:154155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
82. Hannesson, H. A., Raynor, R. N., and Crafts, A. S. 1945. Herbicidal use of carbon disulfide. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 693. 57 p.Google Scholar
83. Hanson, Noel S. 1962. Weed control practices and research for sugarcane in Hawaii. Weeds 10:192200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
84. Hanson, N. S., Keim, F. D., and Goss, D. L. 1943. Bindweed eradication in Nebraska. Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 50. 24 p.Google Scholar
85. Harmon, George W. and Keim, F. D. 1934. The percentage and viability of weed seeds recovered in the feces of farm animals and their longevity when buried in manure. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 26:762767.Google Scholar
86. Harris, L. E. and Hyslop, J. R. 1942. Selective sprays for weed control in crops. Oregon Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 403. 31 p.Google Scholar
87. Harrison, F. C. 1900. Some common Ontario weeds. Ontario Agr. and Experimental Union Bull. 128. 96 p.Google Scholar
88. Helgeson, E. A. and Gebracht, D. 1940. Chemical control of annual weeds in flax and grain fields. North Dakota Agr. Exp. Sta. Bimonthly Bull. 3:710.Google Scholar
89. Henderson, L. F. 1898. Twelve of Idaho's worst weeds. Idaho Exp. Sta. Bull. 14:89136.Google Scholar
90. Hildebrand, E. M. 1946. War on weeds. Science 103:465468, 492.Google Scholar
91. Hildebrand, E. M. and Palmiter, D. H. 1942. Ammonium sulfamate for weed control. Proc. New York Hort. Soc. 87:3440.Google Scholar
92. Hill, G. D., McGahen, J. W., Baker, H. M., Finnerty, D. W., and Bingeman, C. W. 1955. The fate of substituted urea herbicides in agricultural soils. Agron. J. 47:93103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
93. Hirsch, A. A. 1942. Toxic effects of sodium pentachlorophenate and other chemicals on water hyacinth. Bot. Gaz. 103:620621.Google Scholar
94. Hitchcock, A. S. and Norton, J. B. S. 1895–1896. Reports on Kansas weeds: The seedlings. Kansas Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 50:2054; Preliminary circular on distribution. Bull. 52:87101. Descriptive list and distribution. Bull. 57:164.Google Scholar
95. Hodgson, J. M. 1950. Electrovation found ineffective on perennial weeds. What's New in Crops and Soils 3(3):25.Google Scholar
96. Holloway, J. K. 1964. Projects in biological control of weeds, p. 650670. In Debach, P. and Schlinger, E. I., Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds. Reinhold Pub. Corp., New York.Google Scholar
97. Holloway, James K. and Huffaker, C. B. 1952. Insects to control weeds. Yearbook of Agr. Separate 2305. p. 135140.Google Scholar
98. Holstun, J. T. and McWhorter, C. G. 1963. Relation of structure to phytotoxicity of s-triazine herbicides on cotton and weeds. Agr. and Food Chem. 11:441443.Google Scholar
99. Howitt, J. E. 1911. Weeds in Ontario. Ontario Agr. Coll. Bull. 188. 144 p.Google Scholar
100. Hulbert, H. W., Remsberg, J. D., and Spence, H. L. 1930. Controlling perennial weeds with chlorates. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 22:423433.Google Scholar
101. Hulbert, H. W. and Benjamin, L. V. 1935. Dry applications of chlorates. Idaho Exp. Sta. Circ. 74. 8 p.Google Scholar
102. Jones, L. R. and Orton, W. G. 1896. The orange hawkweed or “paint-brush.” Vermont Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 56. 15 p.Google Scholar
103. Kephart, L. W. 1948. Remarks accepting honorary membership. Proc. No. Centro Weed Control Conf. 5:181183.Google Scholar
104. Kephart, L. W. 1949. Future needs in weed control research. Proc. West. Weed Contr. Conf. 11:3032.Google Scholar
105. Kiesselbach, T. A., Petersen, N. F., and Burr, W. W. 1934. Bindweeds and their control. Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 287. 47 p.Google Scholar
106. King, Lawrence J., Lambrech, J. A., and Finn, Thomas P. 1950. Herbicidal properties of sodium 2,4-dichlorophenoxyethyl sulfate. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 16:191208.Google Scholar
107. Latshaw, W. L. and Zahnley, J. W. 1927. Experiments with sodium chlorate and other chemicals as herbicides for field bindweed. J. Agr. Res. 35:757767.Google Scholar
108. Litzenberger, S. C. 1942. The effectiveness of borax and sodium chlorate-borax combinations for the control of perennial weeds. Montana Agr. Exp. Sta. War Circ. 2. 11 p.Google Scholar
109. Litzenberger, S. C. and Post, A. H. 1943. Selective sprays for control of weeds in Kentucky bluegrass lawns. Montana Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 411. 23 p.Google Scholar
110. Litzenberger, S. C., Post, A. H., and Bingham, G. H. 1945. Controlling broadleaved annual and biennial weeds with sinox. Montana Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 430. 18 p.Google Scholar
111. Loomis, W. E. 1938. The control of dandelions in lawns. J. Agr. Res. 56:855868.Google Scholar
112. Loomis, W. E., Bissey, Russell, and Smith, E. V. 1931. Chlorates as herbicides. Science 74:485.Google Scholar
113. Loomis, W. E. and Noecker, N. L. 1936. Petroleum sprays for dandelions. Science 83:6364.Google Scholar
114. Loyer, . 1923. Emploi des chlorates pour la destruction des herbes dans les cereales de printemps. Compt. Rend. Acad. Agr. France 9:957960.Google Scholar
115. Lute, Anna M., Brown, Edgar, Holms, F. S., Serrine, Emma F., Stone, A. L., and Wright, W. H. 1942. History of the association of seed analysts. Edwards Bros. Inc., Litho Printers, Ann Arbor, Mich. 51 p.Google Scholar
116. Mackenthun, Kenneth M. 1952. Cleaner lakes can be a reality. Wisconsin Conserv. Bull. 17:14.Google Scholar
117. McCall, G. L. and Zahnley, J. W. 1949. Control of noxious perennial grasses with the trichloroacetates. Kansas Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 255. 8 p.Google Scholar
118. McCleod, J. H., McGugan, B. M., and Coppel, H. C. 1962. A review of the biological control attempts against insects and weeds in Canada. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Tech. Comm. No. 2. Central Sales, Farnham Royal, Bucks, England. 216 p.Google Scholar
119. McWhorter, C. J. 1966. Sesbania control in soybeans with 2,4-D wax bars. Weeds 14:152155.Google Scholar
120. Miller, D. 1936. Biological control of noxious weeds. New Zealand J. Sci. and Technol. 18:581584.Google Scholar
121. Millspaugh, C. F. 1890. The Canada thistle. West Virginia Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 12:268274.Google Scholar
122. Millspaugh, C. F. 1892. Descriptive list of weeds of West Virginia. West Virginia Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 22:178214.Google Scholar
123. Mitchell, J. W. and Hamner, C. L. 1944. Polyethyleneglycols as carriers for growth regulating substances. Bot. Gaz. 105:474483.Google Scholar
124. Moran, W. T. and Shaw, J. M. 1948. A new killer for waterweeds. U. S. Bur. Reclam. Era 34:8183, 93.Google Scholar
125. Moore, G. T. and Kellerman, K. F. 1905. Copper as an algacide and disinfectant in water supplies. U. S. Dep. Agr. Bur. Plant Ind. Bull. 76. 55 p.Google Scholar
126. Moore, Donald H., George, Donald K., Vaughn, Martin O., and Garman, John A. 1953. Evaluation of three carbamate herbicides in comparison with isopropyl N-(3-chlorophenyl) carbamate. Agr. and Food Chem. 1(19):153158.Google Scholar
127. Muenscher, W. C. 1932. Killing perennial weeds with chlorates during winter. Cornell Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 542. 8 p.Google Scholar
128. Mukula, J. and Ruuttunen, E. 1969. Chemical weed control in Finland 1887–1965. Ann. Finnish Agr., J. Agr. Res. Centre Vol. 8, Suppl. 1. 45 p.Google Scholar
129. National Agricultural Chemicals Association. 1958. Open door to plenty. NACA, Washington, D. C. 64 p.Google Scholar
130. Natural Gas Processors Association. 1964. Research on flame weed control, Technical papers. Proc. 1st Annu. Symp. 38 p.Google Scholar
131. Neely, Wirston J. and Brain, Sidney G. 1944. Control of weeds and grass in cotton by flaming. Mississippi Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 118. 6 p.Google Scholar
132. Olive, E. W. 1909. The killing of mustard by use of iron sulfate. South Dakota Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 112:485498.Google Scholar
133. Osborne, O. M. 1911. Weed pests of Idaho and methods of eradication. Idaho Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 71. 36 p.Google Scholar
134. Oswald, E. I. 1908. The effect of animal digestion and fermentation of manure on the viability of weeds. Maryland Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 128:265291.Google Scholar
135. Palmer, C. V. 1959. Algae in water supplies. U. S. Public Health Serv. Pub. 657. 88 p.Google Scholar
136. Pammel, L. H. 1915. Weeds of farm and garden. Orange Judd Co., N. Y. 281 p.Google Scholar
137. Pammel, L. H. and King, C. M. 1909. Notes on eradication of weeds with experiments made in 1907–08. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 105:265300.Google Scholar
138. Panton, J. H. 1887. Weeds. Ontario Agr. Coll. Bull. 10. 3 p.Google Scholar
139. Pavlychenko, T. K. and Harrington, H. B. 1934. Competitive efficiency of weeds and cereal crops. Canada J. Res. 10:7794.Google Scholar
140. Peitersen, A. K. and Burdick, R. T. 1920. Perennial peppergrass in Colorado. Colorado Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 264. 10 p.Google Scholar
141. Perkins, R. C. L., Swezey, O. H., and Koebele, A. 1924. The introduction into Hawaii of insects that attack lantana. Hawaiian Sugar Planters Assoc. Exp. Sta. Entomol. Serv. Bull. 16. 83 p.Google Scholar
142. Peterson, Gale E. 1967. The discovery and development of 2,4-D. Agr. Histor. 41:243253.Google Scholar
143. Pettey, F. W. 1948. The biological control of prickly pears in South Africa. South Africa Dep. Agr. Sci. Bull. 271. 163 p.Google Scholar
144. Pipal, F. J. 1914. Wild garlic and its eradication. Purdue Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 175. 43 p.Google Scholar
145. Piper, C. V. 1893. Common fungous diseases and methods of prevention-dodder. Washington Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 8:131144.Google Scholar
146. Piper, C. V. 1898. The Russian thistle in Washington. Washington Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 34. 18 p.Google Scholar
147. Phybus, Mary B., Wain, R. L., and Wightman, F. 1958. New plant growth substances with selective herbicidal activity. Nature 182:1094, 1095.Google Scholar
148. Raynor, R. N. 1937. The chemical control of St. Johnswort. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 615. 38 p.Google Scholar
149. Rich, F. A. and Jones, L. R. 1902. A poisonous plant, the common horsetail. Vermont Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 95. 8 p.Google Scholar
150. Robbins, W. W., Crafts, A. S., and Raynor, R. N. 1942. Weed control. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York and London. 543 p.Google Scholar
151. Rose, J. N. 1891. Two new weeds in the U. S. Broomrape (Orobanchi ramosa) and saltwort (Salsoli kali). U. S. Dep. Agr. Annu. Rep. p. 355358.Google Scholar
152. Schultz, E. R. and Thompson, Noel F. 1926. Some effects of sodium arsenite when used to kill common barberry. U. S. Dep. Agr. Dep. Bull. 1316. 18 p.Google Scholar
153. Schinendiman, A., Torrie, J. H., and Briggs, G. M. 1943. Effects of sinox, a selective weed spray, on legume seedlings, weeds, and crop yields. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 35:901908.Google Scholar
154. Scribner, T. Lamson. 1869. Weeds of Maine. Sprague, Owen, and Nash. 62 p. Ref. U. S. Dep. Agr. Annu. Rep. 1869:503–504.Google Scholar
155. Sculthorpe, C. D. 1967. The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants. St. Martin's Press, New York. 610 p.Google Scholar
156. Seaman, D. E. and Porterfield, W. A. 1964. Control of aquatic weeds by the snail Marisa cornuarietis . Weeds 12:8792.Google Scholar
157. Seeley, C. I. 1952. Controlling perennial weeds with tillage. Idaho Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 288. 43 p.Google Scholar
158. Selby, A. D. and Van atta, D. R. 1916. Kill garlic and wild onions by oil spraying. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Monthly Bull. 1(12):355359.Google Scholar
159. Shafer, E. G., Lee, O. C., and Miller, J. R. 1929. Eradicating the bindweed with sodium chlorate. Washington Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 235. 16 p.Google Scholar
160. Shaw, W. C. and Swanson, C. R. 1953. The relation of structural configuration to the herbicidal properties and phytotoxicity of several carbamates and other chemicals. Weeds II:4365.Google Scholar
161. Shaw, W. C. and Loustalot, A. J. 1963. Revolution in weed science. Reprint from Agr. Sci. Review, U. S. Dep. Agr. Coop. State Res. Serv. Quart. Pub. Fall. 10 p.Google Scholar
162. Southwick, Lawrence. 1954. Dow dalapon a new formulation now available to research workers. Down to Earth (Spring). p. 7, 8.Google Scholar
163. Spence, H. L. Jr., 1937. Eradicating perennial weeds with carbon bisulphide. Univ. of Idaho Ext. Bull. 106. 10 p.Google Scholar
164. Stewart, George and Pittman, D. W. 1924. Ridding the land of wild morning glory. Utah Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 189. 30 p.Google Scholar
165. Surber, E. W. 1949. Control of aquatic plants in ponds and lakes. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Serv. Fisheries Leafl. 344. 20 p.Google Scholar
166. Talley, P. J. 1960. Tentative recommendations for weed control in cotton. Mississippi Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 471. 16 p.Google Scholar
167. Thornton, B. J. and Durrell, L. W. 1933. Colorado weeds. Colorado Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 403. 115 p.Google Scholar
168. Timmons, F. L. 1938. Methods of eradicating bindweed. Fort Hays Branch, Kansas Agr. Exp. Sta. Contrib. No. 24. 13 p.Google Scholar
169. Timmons, F. L. 1941. Results of bindweed control experiments at the Fort Hays Branch Station, Hays, Kansas, 1935 to 1940. Kansas Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 296. 50 p.Google Scholar
170. Timmons, F. L. 1942. The dissemination of prickly pear seed by jack rabbits. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 34:513520.Google Scholar
171. Timmons, F. L. 1942. The rise and decline of cactus in Kansas. Kansas State Board Agr. Bien. Rep. 33:3746.Google Scholar
172. Timmons, F. L. 1949. Duration of viability of bindweed seeds under field conditions and experimental results in the control of bindweed seedlings. Agron. J. 41:130133.Google Scholar
173. Todd, S. Edwards. 1866. Improved farm implements. Allen's new weeding hoe. U. S. Dep. Agr. Annu. Rep. p. 285.Google Scholar
174. U. S. Department of Agriculture. 1860. Weeds, composition, means of spreading, means of destroying. U. S. Dep. Agr. Annu. Rep. p. 63, 133–134.Google Scholar
175. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE, and U. S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, BUREAU OF RECLAMATION JOINT REPORT. 1963. Chemical control of submersed waterweeds in western irrigation and drainage canals. U. S. Dep. Agr. ARS 34–57. 14 p.Google Scholar
176. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, BUREAU OF RECLAMATION. 1949. Control of weeds on irrigation systems. Rev. Government Printing Off., Washington. D. C. 140 p.Google Scholar
177. Vasey, George C. 1886. Weeds of agriculture. U. S. Dep. Agr. Annu. Rep. p. 8493.Google Scholar
178. VERMONT AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. 1907. Vermont weeds. Vermont Agr. Exp. Sta. Annu. Rep. 20:417422.Google Scholar
179. VERMONT AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. 1909. Vermont's worst weeds compared in periodic surveys 1872, 1891, 1898, and 1909. Vermont Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 46:237240.Google Scholar
180. Wain, R. L. 1955. A new approach to selective weed control. Ann. Appl. Biol. 42:151157.Google Scholar
181. Wain, R. L. 1963. 3:5-dihalogeno-4-hydroxy benzonitriles: New herbicides with molluscocidal activity. Nature 200:28.Google Scholar
182. Waldron, C. B. 1892. Troublesome members of the mustard family. North Dakota Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 6. 19 p.Google Scholar
183. Waldron, L. R. 1903. Noxious weeds and how to kill them. North Dakota Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 56:198244.Google Scholar
184. Walker, Ernest. 1906. Suggestions upon the care of apple orchards. Arkansas Agr. Exp. Sta. Press Bull. 25:14.Google Scholar
185. Wells, H. G. 1961. The Outline of History. Sixth ed. Garden City Books, Garden City, N. Y. p. 128, 132, 183.Google Scholar
186. Welton, F. A. 1929. Sodium chlorate as a lawn weed killer. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bimonthly Bull. 141:188190.Google Scholar
187. Westgate, W. A. and Raynor, R. N. 1940. New selective spray for control of certain weeds. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 634. 36 p.Google Scholar
188. White, K. D. 1967. Agricultural Implements in the Roman World. Cambridge Univ. Press, London. 232 p.Google Scholar
189. Wiese, A. F. and Rea, H. E. 1961. Control of field bindweed and other perennial weeds with benzoic and phenylacetic acids. Weeds 9:423428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
190. Wilcox, E. W. 1909. Carbon bisulphide for killing weeds. Hawaii Agr. Exp. Sta. Press Bull. 25:14.Google Scholar
191. Willard, C. J. 1930. Killing field weeds with chlorates. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bimonthly Bull. 146:155168.Google Scholar
192. Willard, C. J. 1950. TCA, a new quackgrass killer. Ohio Farm and Home Res. March–April. p. 24, 25.Google Scholar
193. Willard, C. J. 1954. Weed control: Past, present, prospects. Agron. J. 46:481484.Google Scholar
194. Williams, F. X. 1922. Notes on some enemies of nutgrass in the Philippines. Hawaiian Planters Rec. 26:9597.Google Scholar
195. Wilson, H. K., Stahler, L. M., Arny, A. C., Harvey, R. B., Larson, A. H., and Landon, R. H. 1942. Battling weeds on Minnesota farms. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 363. 28 p.Google Scholar
196. Wood, H. E. 1959. A brief history of weeds and their control in Manitoba. Manitoba Dep. Agr. and Immigr. Pub. 307. 18 p.Google Scholar
197. Woods, Chas. D. and Bartlett, J. M. 1909. Field experiments 1906–1908. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 167:85104.Google Scholar
198. Wooten, O. B. and McWhorter, C. G. 1961. A device for subsurface application of herbicides. Weeds 9:3641.Google Scholar
199. Yeo, R. R. 1967. Silver dollar fish for biological control of submersed aquatic weeds. Weeds 15:2731.Google Scholar
200. Yost, T. F. 1939. Homemade Bindweed Tools. Kansas State Bd. Agr. Pub. Kansas State Printing Plant, Topeka, Kansas. 39 p.Google Scholar
201. Yost, T. F. 1940. Summary of bindweed situation and progress in 1939. Kansas State Board Agr. Rep. 237. 73 p.Google Scholar
202. Zahnley, J. W. and Fitch, J. B. 1934. Effect of ensiling on the viability of weed seeds. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 26:816822.Google Scholar
203. Zeiger, C. F. 1967. Biological control of alligatorweed with Agasicles sp. in Florida. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 20:299303.Google Scholar