Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T04:10:33.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research Needs for Integrated Weed Management Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. G. McWhorter  and
W. C. Shaw
C. G. McWhorter
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Stoneville, MS 38776
W. C. Shaw
Affiliation:
National Program Staff, Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Beltsville, MD 20705
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Producers of food have always been troubled with weeds. Hand labor was the primary source of weed control for centuries, and selective weed control was not achieved until copper sulphate was used to control mustard (Brassica spp.) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in 1896 (4, 42). Adequate crop selectivity was usually difficult to obtain with herbicides during the first 40 yr of the 20th century and the cost of the early herbicides was high.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Abernathy, J. R. 1979. Nationwide crop losses caused by weeds without herbicide availability. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 66.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1979. A look at world pesticide markets. Farm Chem. 142:61–68.Google Scholar
3. Allen, G. E. and Bath, J. E. 1980. The conceptual and institutional aspects of integrated pest management. Bioscience 30:658–663.Google Scholar
4. Baldwin, F. L. and Santelmann, P. W. 1980. Weed science in integrated pest management. Bioscience 30:657–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Barfield, C. S. and Stimac, J. L. 1980. Pest management: an entomological perspective. Bioscience 30:683–689.Google Scholar
6. Bird, G. W. and Thomason, I. J. 1980. Integrated pest management: the role of nematology. Bioscience 30:670–674.Google Scholar
7. Boling, J. C. and Hacskaylo, J. 1966. Effect of the systemic insecticide UC 21149 and four pre-emergence herbicides on cotton seedlings. J. Econ. Entomol. 59:1026–1027.Google Scholar
8. Boyette, C. D., Templeton, G. E., and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1979. Control of winged waterprimrose (Jussiaea decurrens) and northern jointvetch (Aeschynomene virginica) with fungal pathogens. Weed Sci. 27:497–501.Google Scholar
9. Boyle, L. W., Hauser, E. W., and Thompson, J. T. 1958. The combined effect of an herbicide and disease on the emergence of peanut seedlings. Weeds 6:461–464.Google Scholar
10. Chandler, J. M. and Oliver, L. R. 1979. Spurred anoda: A potential weed in southern crops. U.S. Dep. Agric., Sci. Ed. Admin., ARM-S-2. 9 pp.Google Scholar
11. Chandler, J. M. and Santelmann, P. W. 1968. Interactions of four herbicides with Rhizoctonia solani on seedling cotton. Weed Sci. 16:453–456.Google Scholar
12. Coffman, C. G. and Gentner, W. A. 1980. Persistence of several controlled release formulations of trifluralin in greenhouse and field. Weed Sci. 28:21–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Conway, K. E. 1976. Evaluation of Cercospora rodmanii as a biological control of waterhyacinths. Phytopathology 66:914–917.Google Scholar
14. Dale, J. E. and Chandler, J. M. 1979. Herbicide-crop rotation for johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control. Weed Sci. 27:479–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Daniel, J. T., Templeton, G. E., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Fox, W. T. 1973. Biological control of northern jointvetch in rice with an endemic fungal disease. Weed Sci. 21:303–307.Google Scholar
16. Dowler, C. C. and Parker, M. B. 1975. Soybean weed control systems in two southern coastal soils. Weed Sci. 23:198–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Drost, D. C. and Doll, J. D. 1980. The allelopathic effect of yellow nutsedge (Cuperus esculentus) on corn (Zea mays) and soybeans (Glycine max . Weed Sci. 28:229–233.Google Scholar
18. Eastin, E. F. 1979. Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar response to propanil. Weed Sci. 27:4–6.Google Scholar
19. Edens, T. C. and Koenig, H. E. 1980. Agroecosystem management in a resource-limited world. Bioscience 30:697–701.Google Scholar
20. Eichers, T. R. 1980. The farm pesticide industry. U.S. Dep. Agric., Econ. Stat. and Coop. Serv., Agric. Econ. Rep. No. 461. Washington, DC. 24 pp.Google Scholar
21. Eichers, T. R., Andrilenas, P. A., and Anderson, T. W. 1978. Farmers use of pesticides in 1976. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Econ. Rep. No. 418. 58 pp.Google Scholar
22. Ellis, J. F., Peek, J. W., Boehle, J. Jr., and Muller, G. 1980. Effectiveness of a new safener for protecting sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) from metolachlor injury. Weed Sci. 28:1–5.Google Scholar
23. Elmore, C. D. 1980. Inhibition of turnip (Brassica rapa) seed germination by velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seed. Weed Sci. 28:658–660.Google Scholar
24. Foley, M. E. and Wax, L. M. 1980. Effects of starch xanthate and sludge polymer on the initial activity with delayed incorporation, residual activity, and crop safety of several herbicides. Weed Sci. 28:626–632.Google Scholar
25. Frank, P. A. and Dechoretz, N. 1980. Allelopathy in dwarf spike-rush (Eleocharis coloradoensis . Weed Sci. 28:499–505.Google Scholar
26. Fry, W. E. and Thurston, H. D. 1980. The relationship of plant pathology to integrated pest management. Bioscience 30:665–669.Google Scholar
27. Hacskaylo, J., Walker, J. K. Jr., and Pires, E. G. 1964. Response of cotton seedlings to combinations of preemergence herbicides and systemic insecticides. Weeds 12:288–291.Google Scholar
28. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1980. Potential antidotes against buthidazole injury to corn (Zea mays . Weed Sci. 28:273–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Hauser, E. W., Jellum, M. D., Dowler, C. C., and Merchant, W. H. 1972. Systems for weed control for soybeans in the coastal plain. Weed Sci. 20:592–598.Google Scholar
30. Haynes, D. L., Tummala, R. L., and Ellis, T. L. 1980. Ecosystem management for pest control. Bioscience 30:690–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Maw, M. G. 1980. Cucullia verbasci an agent for the biological control of common mullein (Verbascum thapsus). Weed Sci. 28:27–30.Google Scholar
32. McWhorter, C. G. and Chandler, J. M. 1981. Conventional weed control technology. In Charudattan, R. and Walker, H. L., eds. Biological Control of Weeds with Plant Pathogens. John Wiley. (In press).Google Scholar
33. McWhorter, C. G. and Barrentine, W. L. 1975. Cocklebur control in soybeans as affected by cultivars, seeding rates, and methods of weed control. Weed Sci. 23:386–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. McWhorter, C. G. and Hartwig, E. E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:56–59.Google Scholar
35. Nyffeler, A., Gerber, H. R., and Hensley, J. R. 1980. Laboratory studies on the behavior of the herbicide safener CGA-43089. Weed Sci. 28:6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Ohr, H. D., Pollack, F. G., and Ingber, B. F. 1977. The occurrence of Alternaria macrospora on Anoda cristata in Mississippi. Plant Dis. Rep. 61:208–209.Google Scholar
37. Ridings, W. H., Mitchell, D. J., Shoulties, C. L., and El-Ghell, N. E. 1976. Biological control of milkweed vine in Florida citrus groves with a pathotype of Phytophthora citrophthora . Pages 224–240 In Freeman, T. E., ed. Proc. IV Int. Symp. Biol. Control of Weeds. Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
38. Santelmann, P. W. 1979. Weed scientists – today and tomorrow. Weed Sci. 27:349–354.Google Scholar
39. Schreiber, M. M. and White, M. D. 1980. Granule structure and rate of release with starch-encapsulated thiocarbamates. Weed Sci. 28:685–690.Google Scholar
40. Shaw, W. C. 1978. Herbicides: The cost/benefit ratio – the public view. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:28–43.Google Scholar
41. Stachon, W. J. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Allelopathic activity of canada thistle (Cirsium arvense . Weed Sci. 28:83–86.Google Scholar
42. Timmons, F. L. 1970. A history of weed control in the United States and Canada. Weed Sci. 18:294–307.Google Scholar
43. U.S. Dep. Agric. 1977. Report of the research planning conference on the role of secondary compounds in plant interactions (allelopathy), a Conf. sponsored by ARS-USDA, Miss. State Univ., March 15–16, 1977. 124 pp.Google Scholar
44. Walker, H. L. 1980. Alternaria macrospora as a potential biocontrol agent for spurred anoda: Production of spores for field studies. U.S. Sci. Ed. Admin., Adv. Agric. Tech., Southern Series (ISSN 0193–3728), No. 12. 5 pp.Google Scholar
45. Walker, H. L. 1981. Granular formulation of Alternaria macrospora for control of spurred anoda (Anoda cristata . Weed Sci. 29: (In press).Google Scholar
46. Walker, H. L. 1981. Fusarium lateritium: A pathogen of spurred anoda (Anoda cristata), prickly sida (Sida spinosa), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 29:629–631.Google Scholar
47. Walker, H. L. 1981. An Alternaria pathogen of sicklepod. Plant Dis. Rep. (In press).Google Scholar
48. Wax, L. M. 1976. Difficult-to-control annual weeds. Proc. 1st World Soybean Res. Conf. 1:420–425.Google Scholar
49. Werner, G. M. and Putnam, A. R. 1980. Differential atrazine tolerance within cucumber (Cucumis sativus . Weed Sci. 28:142–148.Google Scholar
50. Wiese, A. F. and Chandler, J. M. 1979. Weeds. In Ennis, W. B. Jr., ed. Introduction to Crop Protection. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
51. Winkle, M. E., Leavitt, J.R.C., and Burnside, O. C. 1980. Acetanilide-antidote combinations for weed control in corn (Zea mays) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor . Weed Sci. 28:699–704.Google Scholar