Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:12:18.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Restoring Species Richness and Diversity in a Russian Knapweed (Acroptilon repens)–infested Riparian Plant Community Using Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Roger L. Sheley ,
Stephen M. Laufenberg ,
James S. Jacobs  and
John Borkowski
Roger L. Sheley*
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Burns, OR 97720
Stephen M. Laufenberg
Affiliation:
Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717
James S. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717
John Borkowski
Affiliation:
Mathematical Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: Roger.Sheley@oregonstate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Species richness and diversity are important indicators of ecosystem function and may be related to plant community resistance to invasion by nonindigenous species. Our specific objective was to determine the influence of clopyralid plus 2,4-D, glyphosate, and fosamine, at different application rates and timings, on richness and diversity of total species, total native species, and total nonnative species within a Russian knapweed–infested plant community. Twenty-eight treatments (3 herbicides by 3 rates by 3 application timings, and an untreated control) were applied to two sites located along the Missouri River riparian corridor in Montana. Clopyralid plus 2,4-D, glyphosate, and fosamine were applied in June (spring rosette stage of Russian knapweed), July (bud to bloom stage of Russian knapweed), and August (flowering stage of Russian knapweed). Herbicide rates were clopyralid plus 2,4-D at 0.08 (clopyralid) + 0.42 (2,4-D), 0.13 + 0.67, and 0.18 + 0.92 kg ai ha−1; glyphosate at 0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 kg ai ha−1; fosamine at 3.6, 7.2, and 10.8 kg ai ha−1. Density of each species was recorded during June and August of 2001 and 2002. Species richness and Simpson's Reciprocal Index (1/D) were calculated. By August 2002, only the glyphosate treatment (4.6 species m−2) yielded greater total richness over that of the control (3.5 species m−2). At that time, diversity after applying clopyralid plus 2,4-D remained similar to that of the control (1.4), but glyphosate (2.3) and fosamine (2.0) increased total species diversity. Nonnative grasses and forbs accounted for the increases in richness and diversity. Glyphosate may be appropriate for enhancing ecosystem function and possibly niche occupation to preempt reinvasion by Russian knapweed, but restoring native species seems unlikely using any of these herbicides alone.

Keywords

Clopyralid, fosamine, glyphosate2,4-DRussian knapweed, Acroptilon repens (L.) DC. CENREWildland weed managementriparian weed managementwildlife habitatrehabilitationdesired plant communitiesnative plants
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , August 2007 , pp. 311 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Carpinelli, M. F. 2000. Designing weed-resistant plant communities by maximizing niche occupation and resource capture. . Bozeman, MT Montana State University.Google Scholar
Chapin, F. S. I. 1993. Functional role of growth forms in ecosystem and global processes. Pages 287–312. in Ehleringer, J.R., Field, C.B. eds. Scaling Physiological Processe:Leaf to Globe. San Diego, CA Academic.Google Scholar
Cronquist, A., Holmgren, A. H., Holmgren, N. H., Reveal, J. L., and Holmgren, P. K. 1977. Intermountain Flora; Vascular Plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A. New York, NY Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Denny, M. K. 2003. Maintaining and establishing culturally important plants after landscape scale disturbance. . Bozeman, MT Montana State University.Google Scholar
Dorn, R. D. 1984. Vascular Plants of Montana. Cheyenne, WY Mountain West.Google Scholar
Egler, F. E. 1954. Vegetation science concepts, I: initial floristic composition-a factor in old-field vegetation development. Vegetatio. 4:412–417.Google Scholar
Frank, D. A. and McNaughton, S. J. 1991. Stability increases with diversity in plant communities: empirical evidence from the Yellowstone drought. Oikos. 62:360–362.Google Scholar
Hanson, H. C. and Whitman, W. C. 1938. Characteristics of major grassland types in western North Dakota. Ecol. Monogr. 8:57–114.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, H. E. 1979. Vegetation of the Yellow Water Triangle, Montana. Billings, MT Montana Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Bureau of Land Management Unnumbered Publication. 57.Google Scholar
Laufenberg, S. M., Sheley, R. L., Jacobs, J. S., and Borkowski, J. 2004. Herbicide effects on density and biomass of Russian knapweed (Acroptilon repens) and associated plant species. Weed Technol. 19:62–72.Google Scholar
Mackie, R. J. 1970. Range ecology and relations of mule deer, elk, and cattle in the Missouri River Breaks, Montana. Wildlife Monograph 20. Bethesda, MD The Wildlife Society. 79.Google Scholar
Marrs, R. H. 1985. The effects of potential bracken and scrub control herbicides on lowland Calluna and grass heath communities in East Anglia, UK. Biol. Conserv. 32:13–32.Google Scholar
Naeem, S., Chapin, F. S. III, and Costanza, R. et al. 1999. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: maintaining natural life support processes. Issues in Ecology 4. Washington, DC Ecological Society of America.Google Scholar
Pokorny, M. L., Sheley, R. L., Zabinski, C. A., Engel, R. E., Svejcar, T. J., and Borkowski, J. J. 2005. Plant functional group diversity as a mechanism for invasion resistance. Restor. Ecol. 13:448–459.Google Scholar
Rice, P. M., Toney, J. C., Bedunah, D. J., and Carlson, C. E. 1997. Plant community diversity and growth form responses to herbicide applications for control of Centaurea maculosa . J. App. Ecol. 34:1397–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheley, R. L. and Carpinelli, M. F. 2005. Creating weed-resistant plant communities using niche-differentiated nonnative species. Range. Ecol. Manag. 58:480–488.Google Scholar
Spehn, E., Joshi, J., Schmid, B., Diemer, M., and Korner, C. 2000. Aboveground resource use increases with plant species richness in experimental grassland ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 14:326–337.Google Scholar
Symstad, A. J. 2000. A test of the effects of functional group richness and composition on grassland invasibility. Ecology. 81:99–109.Google Scholar
Tilman, D. 1997. Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology. 87:81–92.Google Scholar
Tilman, D., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Reich, P., Ritchie, M., and Siemann, E. 1997. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science. 277:1300–1305.Google Scholar
Whitson, T. D. 1999. Russian knapweed. in Sheley, R., Petroff, J., eds. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. 1999. Corvallis, OR Oregon State University Press. 438.Google Scholar