Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T19:36:28.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal changes in glucose, fructose, sucrose, and fructans in the roots of dandelion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert G. Wilson ,
Stephen D. Kachman  and
Alex R. Martin
Stephen D. Kachman
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0712
Alex R. Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0712
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Roots of dandelion were exhumed from the soil monthly from 1997 to 1999 near Scottsbluff, NE, to assess the seasonal changes in total sugars, glucose, fructose, sucrose, and fructans. In the spring, the initiation of plant growth was accompanied by increased fructose and, to a lesser degree, glucose as a percentage of total sugars. During June, July, and August, the percentage of total sugars with a middle to high degree of polymerization (DP) fructans increased. The DP in fructans changed with reduced rainfall and was associated with increased fructose and decreased high-DP fructans as a percentage of total sugars. Decreasing or freezing soil temperatures in the fall were associated with increased fructose and decreased high-DP fructans as a percentage of total sugars. When soil froze in December, the percentage of total sugars as sucrose and low-DP fructans increased and mid- to high-DP fructans decreased. The seasonal fluctuations of glucose, fructose, sucrose, and various fructan polymers may be one mechanism that allows dandelion to adapt to environmental stresses and gain a competitive advantage over other plants in the community. An understanding of these seasonal fluctuations in sugars may also allow better timing of biological, mechanical, and chemical control practices for improved plant management.

Keywords

Dandelion, Taraxacum officinale Weber in Wiggers TAROFAsteraceaecarbohydratesTAROF
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 150 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Cyr, D. R., Bewley, J. D., and Dumbroff, E. B. 1990. Seasonal dynamics of carbohydrate and nitrogenous components in the roots of perennial weeds. Plant. Cell Environ. 13:359–365.Google Scholar
Edelman, J. and Jefford, T. G. 1968. The mechanism of fructan metabolism in higher plants as exemplified in Helianthus tuberosus . New Phytol. 67:517–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, M., Chatterton, N. J., and Harrison, P. A. 1996. Purification and characterization of a new fructan series from species of Asteraceae. New Phytol. 132:63–66.Google Scholar
Hendry, G. 1993. Evolutionary origins and natural functions of fructans. A climatological, biogeographic and mechanistic appraisal. New Phytol. 123:3–14.Google Scholar
Isejima, E. M. and Figueiredo-Ribeiro, R. L. 1993. Fructan variations in tuberous roots of Viguiera discolor Baker (Asteraceae): the influence of phenology. Plant Cell Physiol. 34:723–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luscher, M., Frehner, M., and Nosberger, J. 1993. Purification and some properties of fructan: fructan fructosyl transferase from dandelion (Taraxacum officinale Weber). New Phytol. 123:437–442.Google Scholar
Meier, H. and Reid, J.S.G. 1982. Reserve polysaccharides other than starch in higher plants. Pages 418–471 In Loewus, F. H. and Tanner, W., eds. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, Plant Carbohydrates. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Michiels, A., Vergauwem, R., Van Wonterghem, D., Van Laere, A., and Van Den Ende, W. 1999. Cloning, sequencing and tissue-specific expression of 1-SST (sucrose: sucrose 1-fructosyl transferase) from Taraxacum officinale . Pages 130–131 In Fuchs, A. and Desprez, B., ed. Proceedings of the Eighth Seminar on Inulin. Lille, France: European Fructan Association.Google Scholar
Nelson, C. J. and Spollen, W. G. 1987. Fructans. Physiol. Plant. 71:512–516.Google Scholar
Olson, B. and Wallander, R. T. 1997. Biomass and carbohydrates of spotted knapweed and Idaho fescue after repeated grazing. J. Range Manag. 50:409–412.Google Scholar
Praznik, W. and Beck, H. F. 1987. Inulin composition during growth of tubers of Helianthus tuberosus . Agric. Biol. Chem. 51:1593–1599.Google Scholar
Salisbury, F. B. and Ross, C. W. 1985. Plant Physiology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, pp. 212–213.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1996. SAS/STAT® Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 6.11. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1104 p.Google Scholar
Timmermans, J. W., Van Leeuwen, M. B., Tournois, H., DeWit, D., and Vliegenthart, J. F. 1994. Quantitative analysis of the molecular weight distribution of inulin by means of anion exchange HPLC with pulsed amperometric detection. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 13:881–888.Google Scholar
Tworkoski, T. 1992. Developmental and environmental effects on assimilate partitioning in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 40:79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Den Ende, W., Mintiens, A., Speleers, H., Onuoha, A., and Van Laere, A. 1996. The metabolism of fructans in roots of Cichorium intybus during growth, storage and forcing. New Phytol. 132:555–563.Google Scholar
Van Den Ende, W. and Van Laere, A. 1996a. Fructan synthesizing and degrading activities in chicory roots (Cichorium intybus L.) during field-growth, storage and forcing. J. Plant Physiol. 149:43–50.Google Scholar
Van Den Ende, W. and Van Laere, A. 1996b. Variation in the in vitro generated fructan pattern from sucrose as a function of the purified chicory root 1-SST and 1-FFT concentrations. J. Exp. Bot. 47:1797–1803.Google Scholar
Van Waes, C., Baert, J. B., Carlier, L., and Van Bockstaele, E. 1998. A rapid determination of the total sugar content and the average inulin chain length in roots of chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). J. Sci. Food Agric. 76:107–110.Google Scholar