Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T04:56:14.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil Enrichment Studies with Trifluralin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

G. E. Carter Jr.  and
N. D. Camper
G. E. Carter Jr.
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Physiol., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29631
N. D. Camper
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Physiol., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29631
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Soil enrichment studies were conducted with trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine) with and without exogenous carbon and nitrogen. From 72 bacterial isolates obtained, eight representative ones were tentatively identified as members of the genus Pseudomonas based on size, shape, Gram reaction, and reaction on fluorescent and motility agar. Two of these eight isolates exhibited a significant increase in numbers of viable cells when grown in a medium with trifluralin as the only exogenous carbon and nitrogen source. Chromatographic analysis of culture medium extracts revealed the presence of a degradation product which was not present in the herbicide control. The concentration of this unknown was greatest at the 50 mg/L level of trifluralin which also supported the greatest bacterial growth.

Information

Type
Carter and Camper: Soil Enrichment
Information
Weed Science , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 1975 , pp. 71 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Audus, L.J. 1964. Herbicide behavior in soil. II. Interactions with soil microorganisms. Pages 163–206 in: Audus, L.J. (ed.), The Physiology and Biochemistry of Herbicides. Academic Press, N.Y. Google Scholar
2. Bardsley, C.E., Savage, K.E., and Walker, J.C. 1968. Trifluralin behavior in soil. II. Volatilization as influenced by concentration, time, soil moisture content, and placement. Agron. J. 60:89–91.Google Scholar
3. Breazeale, F.W. and Camper, N.D. 1970. Bacterial, fungal, and actinomycete populations in soil receiving repeated applications of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and trifluralin. Appl. Microbiol. 19:379–380.Google Scholar
4. Breazeale, F.W. and Camper, N.D. 1972. Effect of selected herbicides on bacterial growth rates. Appl. Microbiol. 23:431–432.Google Scholar
5. Carter, G.E. Jr. and Camper, N.D. 1972. Chemical and microbial degradation of trifluralin. Proc. Southern Weed Sci. Soc. 25:437.Google Scholar
6. Carter, G.E. Jr. and Camper, N.D. 1973. Soil microbial studies with trifluralin. Proc. Southern Weed Sci. Soc. 26:398.Google Scholar
7. Crosby, D.G. and Leitis, E. 1973. The photodecomposition of trifluralin in water. Bull. Environ. Contam. & Toxicol. 10:237–241.Google Scholar
8. Difco Laboratories, Inc. 1953. Difco Manual, ninth edition. Detroit, Michigan.Google Scholar
9. Funderburk, H.H. Jr., Schultz, D.P., Neig, N.S., Rodriguez-Kabana, R., and Curl, E.A. 1967. Metabolism of trifluralin by soil microorganisms and higher plants. Proc. Southern Weed Sci. Soc. 20:389.Google Scholar
10. Golab, T., Herberg, R.J., Day, E.W., Raun, A.P., Holzer, F.J., and Probst, G.W. 1970. Fate of carbon-14 trifluralin in artificial rumen fluid and in ruminant animals. J. Agr. Food Chem. 17:576–580.Google Scholar
11. Hamdi, Y.A. and Tewfik, M.S. 1969. Effect of the herbicide trifluralin on nitrogen-fixation in Rhizobium and Aztobacter and on nitrification. Acta. Microbiol. Polonica 1:53–58.Google Scholar
12. Hamdi, Y.A. and Tewfik, M.S. 1969. Decomposition of the herbicide trifluralin by a pseudomonad. Acta Microbiol. Polonica 1:83–85.Google Scholar
13. Kearney, P.C., Plimmer, J.R., and Klingebiel, U.I. 1973. Microbial metabolism of trifluralin. Abst. No. 3, ACS Division of Pesticide Chem.Google Scholar
14. McCleskey, C.S. and Christopher, W.N. 1947. Laboratory Manual and Workbook for Elementary Bacteriology. D.C. Heath & Company.Google Scholar
15. Messersmith, C.G., Burnside, O.C., and Lavy, T.L. 1971. Biological and non-biological dissipation of trifluralin from soil. Weed Sci. 19:285–290.Google Scholar
16. Parka, S.J. and Tepe, J.B. 1969. The disappearance of trifluralin from field soils. Weed Sci. 17:119–122.Google Scholar
17. Parochetti, J.V. and Hein, E.R. 1973. Volatility and photodecomposition of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin. Weed Sci. 21:469–473.Google Scholar
18. Probst, G.W., Golab, T., Herberg, R.J., Holzer, F.J., Parka, S.J., Van der Schans, C., and Tepe, J.B. 1967. Fate of trifluralin in soils and plants. J. Agr. Food Chem. 15:592–599.Google Scholar
19. Savage, K.E. and Barrentine, W.L. 1969. Trifluralin persistence as affected by depth of soil incorporation. Weed Sci. 17:349–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Savage, K.E. 1973. Nitralin and trifluralin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 21:285–288.Google Scholar
21. Smith, R.A., Belles, W.S., Shen, K., and Woods, W.G. 1973. The degradation of dinitramine (N3,N3-diethyl-2,4-dinitro-6-trifluoromethyl-m-phenylenediamine) in soil. Pesticide Biochem. and Physiol. 3:278–288.Google Scholar
22. Society of American Bacteriologists. 1957. Manual of Microbiological Methods. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. 315 pp.Google Scholar
23. Starr, M.P., Wise, J.E., Klein, H.P., and Sisselman, C.B. 1943. Growth of phytopathogenic bacteria in a synthetic asparagin medium. Phytopathology 43:314–318.Google Scholar
24. Wright, W.L. and Warren, G.F. 1965. Photochemical decomposition of trifluralin. Weeds 13:329–331.Google Scholar