Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-31T01:55:02.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uptake and Translocation of Nitrofen and Oxyfluorfen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Omosuyi Fadayomi  and
G.F. Warren
Omosuyi Fadayomi
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic.
G.F. Warren
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The site of uptake of nitrofen (2,4-dichlorophenyl-p-nitrophenyl ether) and oxyfluorfen [2-chloro-1-(3-ethoxy-4-nitrophenoxy)-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzene] was studied using a double pot technique. Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘RS610′] and pea (Pisum sativum L. ‘Alaska’) were the test plants. Herbicidal activity measured by the reduction in fresh weight of the roots and shoots of treated plants showed that exposure of the shoot zone to the herbicides caused much more injury to the plants than root exposure. Translocation of both compounds from root applications to tops of pea and sorghum was studied using 14C-labeled herbicides. There was very little movement of the compounds from the roots of both species. Translocation of the compounds from foliage application was studied using greenbean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‘Spartan Arrow’) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr ‘Wayne’]. Almost all of the applied 14C-herbicides remained at the point of application.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , March 1977 , pp. 111 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, W.L. and Warren, G.F. 1971. Shoot zone activity of trifluralin and nitralin. Weed Sci. 19:37–41.Google Scholar
2. Eastin, E.F. 1971. Movement and fate of fluorodifen-1′-14C in cucumber seedlings. Weed Res. 11:63–68.Google Scholar
3. Eastin, E.F. 1971. Degradiation of fluorodifen-1′-14C by peanut seedling roots. Weed Res. 11:120–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Eastin, E.F. 1971. Fate of fluorodifen in resistant peanut seedlings. Weed Sci. 19:261–265.Google Scholar
5. Eshel, Y. and Prendeville, G.N. 1967. A technique for studying root vs. shoot uptake of soil-applied herbicides. Weed Res. 7:242–245.Google Scholar
6. Fadayomi, O. and Warren, G.F. 1976. Differential activity of three diphenyl ether herbicides. Weed Sci. (In press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hawton, D. and Stobbe, E.H. 1971. The fate of nitrofen in rape, redroot pigweed and green foxtail. Weed Sci. 19:555–558.Google Scholar
8. Matsunaka, Skooichi. 1969. Activation and inactivation of herbicides by higher plants. Residue Rev. 25:45–58.Google Scholar
9. Nishimoto, R.K. and Warren, G.F. 1971. Site of uptake, movement and activity of DCPA. Weed Sci. 19:152–155.Google Scholar
10. Nishimoto, R.K. and Warren, G.F. 1971. Shoot zone uptake and translocation of soil applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 19:156–161.Google Scholar
11. Walter, J.P., Eastin, E.F., and Merkle, M.G. 1970. The persistence and movement of fluorodifen in soils and plants. Weed Res. 10:165–171.Google Scholar
12. Yih, R.Y. and Swithenbank, Colin. 1975. New potent diphenyl ether herbicides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 23:592–593.Google Scholar