Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-frp75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T12:47:37.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of CGA 362622 in cotton and two weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert J. Richardson ,
Kriton K. Hatzios  and
Henry P. Wilson
Robert J. Richardson
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Painter, VA 23420
Kriton K. Hatzios
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of the herbicide CGA 362622 were studied in cotton, spurred anoda, and smooth pigweed. 14C-labeled CGA 362622 was foliarly applied to cotton at the cotyledon to the one-leaf growth stage or at the two- to three-leaf growth stage and to spurred anoda and smooth pigweed at the four- to six-leaf growth stage. Differential absorption, translocation, and metabolism contributed to the differential tolerance of cotton, spurred anoda, and smooth pigweed to CGA 362622. Rapid translocation and a slow rate of metabolism appear to explain the susceptibility of smooth pigweed. Reduced absorption and translocation as well as rapid metabolism contribute to the CGA 362622 tolerance of cotton at the two growth stages. Limited translocation may explain the intermediate tolerance of spurred anoda to CGA 362622.

Keywords

CGA 362622, N-[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)carbamoyl]-3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-pyridin-2-sulfonamide sodium saltcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. GOSHIsmooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L., AMACHspurred anoda, Anoda cristata (L.) Schlecht., ANVCRSulfonylurea herbicidesherbicide toleranceherbicide sensitivity

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 157 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Ackley, A. A., Hatzios, K. K., and Wilson, H. P. 1999. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of rimsulfuron in black nightshade (Solanum nigrum), eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum), and hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides). Weed Technol. 13:151–156.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. 2002. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar-applied CGA 362622 in cotton, peanut, and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 50:293–298.Google Scholar
Branson, J. W., Smith, K. L., and Namenek, R. C. 2001. Evaluation of CGA 362622 contribution to transgenic cotton weed control programs. Page 1210 In Dugger, C. P. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. Volume 2. January 9–13, 2001; Anaheim, CA. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America.Google Scholar
Brecke, B. J., Bridges, D. C., and Grey, T. 2000. CGA 362622 for post-emergence weed control in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:26–27.Google Scholar
Brown, H. M. and Neighbors, S. M. 1987. Soybean metabolism of chlorimuron ethyl: physiological basis for soybean selectivity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 29:112–120.Google Scholar
Carey, J. B., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1997. Physiological basis for nicosulfuron and primisulfuron selectivity in five plant species. Weed Sci. 45:22–30.Google Scholar
Faircloth, W. H., Patterson, M. G., and Monks, C. D. 2001. Evaluation of CGA-362622 for weed control in Alabama cotton. Page 1210 In Dugger, C. P. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. Volume 2. January 9–13, 2001; Anaheim, CA. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America.Google Scholar
Foes, M. J., Lixin, L., Tranel, P. J., Wax, L. M., and Stoller, E. W. 1998. A biotype of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistant to triazine and ALS herbicides. Weed Sci. 46:514–520.Google Scholar
Gallaher, K., Mueller, T. C., Hays, R. M., Schwartz, O., and Barrett, M. 1999. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of primisulfuron and nicosulfuron in broadleaf signalgrass (Brachiaria platyphylla) and corn. Weed Sci. 47:8–12.Google Scholar
Hinz, J.R.R. and Owen, M.D.K. 1996. Nicosulfuron and primisulfuron selectivity in corn (Zea mays) and two annual grass weeds. Weed Sci. 44:219–223.Google Scholar
Hudetz, M., Foery, W., Wells, J., and Soares, J. E. 2000. CGA 362622, a new low rate Novartis post-emergent herbicide for cotton and sugarcane. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:163–166.Google Scholar
Koeppe, M. K., Hirata, C. M., Brown, H. M., Kenyon, W. H., O'Keefe, D. P., Lau, S. C., Zimmerman, W. T., and Green, J. M. 2000. Basis of selectivity of the herbicide rimsulfuron in maize. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 66:170–181.Google Scholar
Lovell, S. T., Wax, L. M., Horak, M. J., and Peterson, D. E. 1996. Imidazolinone and sulfonylurea resistance in a biotype of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis). Weed Sci. 44:789–794.Google Scholar
Manley, B. S., Hatzios, K. K., and Wilson, H. P. 1999. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of chlorimuron and nicosulfuron in imidazolinone-resistant and -susceptible smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus). Weed Technol. 13:759–764.Google Scholar
Manley, B. S., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1996. Smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and livid amaranth (A. lividus) response to several imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Technol. 10:835–841.Google Scholar
Peterson, L. A. and Krueger, A. R. 1988. An intermittent aeroponics system. Crop Sci. 28:712–713.Google Scholar
Porterfield, D., Wilcut, J. W., and Askew, S. D. 2000. Weed management in cotton with CGA-362622, fluometuron, and prometryn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:166–167.Google Scholar
Poston, D. H., Wu, J., Hatzios, K. K., and Wilson, H. P. 2002. Enhanced sensitivity to cloransulam-methyl in imidazolinone-resistant smooth pigweed. Weed Sci. 711–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibli, R. A. and Smith, M.A.L. 1999. Capacity for biocompatibility assessment in tissue culture and hydroponic systems. J. Plant Nutr. 22:1529–1540.Google Scholar
Shimzu, T., Nakayama, I., Nakao, T., Nezu, Y., and Abe, H. 1994. Inhibition of plant acetolactate synthase by herbicides, pyrimidinylsalicylic acids. J. Pestic. Sci. 19:59–67.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Horak, M. J. 1997. Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistance to selected ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. 45:192–197.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R. and Miller, D. K. 2001. Evaluation of CGA 362622 in Louisisana cotton. Page 1232 In Dugger, C. P. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. Volume 2. January 9–13, 2001; Anaheim, CA. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America.Google Scholar
Walker, L. M., Hatzios, K. K., and Wilson, H. P. 1994. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-thifensulfuron in soybean (Glycine max), spurred anoda (Anoda cristata), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). J. Plant Growth Regul. 13:27–32.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Askew, S. D., and Porterfield, D. 2000. Weed management in non-transgenic and transgenic cotton with CGA 362622. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:27.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M. G., Cole, T. A., and Hicks, T. V. 1989. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar-applied chlorimuron in soybeans (Glycine max), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 37:175–180.Google Scholar