Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T16:50:49.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adsorption, Mobility, and Efficacy of Alachlor and Metolachlor as Influenced by Soil Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. John Peter  and
Jerome B. Weber
C. John Peter
Affiliation:
E. I. duPont de Nemours and Co., Wilmington, DE 19898
Jerome B. Weber
Affiliation:
E. I. duPont de Nemours and Co., Wilmington, DE 19898
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Alachlor [2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamide] and metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide] adsorption was positively correlated with soil organic-matter content, clay content, and surface area as measured by ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGME) or benzyl ethyl ether (BEE) and inversely correlated with herbicidal activity. Alachlor was adsorbed in slightly greater amounts by soil than metolachlor. Metolachlor had slightly greater bioactivity than alachlor on grass weeds, but the herbicides had similar activity on broadleaf weeds. Slightly greater amounts of metolachlor than alachlor were leached through a Norfolk soil and slightly greater amounts of alachlor were retained in the upper soil zones, compared with metolachlor.

Keywords

Degradationleachingsurface area
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 6 , November 1985 , pp. 874 - 881
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1983. Herbicide Handbook. 5th ed. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL. 515 pp.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1983. Reference soil test methods for the southern region of the United States. South. Coop. Series Bull. 289. Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA. 40 pp.Google Scholar
3. Ballard, J. L. and Santelman, P. W. 1973. Influence of selected soil properties on alachlor activity. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:385–388.Google Scholar
4. Beestman, G. B. and Deming, J. M. 1974. Dissipation of acetanilide herbicides from soils. Agron. J. 66:308–311.Google Scholar
5. Brunauer, S., Emmet, P. H., and Teller, E. 1938. Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60:309–319.Google Scholar
6. Carringer, R. D., Weber, J. B., and Monaco, T. J. 1975. Adsorption-desorption of selected pesticides by organic matter and montmorillonite. J. Agric. Food Chem. 23:568–572.Google Scholar
7. Carter, D. L., Heilman, M. D., and Gonzales, C. L. 1965. Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether for determining surface area of silicate minerals. Soil Sci. 21:308–309.Google Scholar
8. Day, P. R. 1965. Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. Pages 545–566 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis (Part I). Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
9. Eshel, Y. 1969. Phytotoxicity, leachability and site of uptake of 2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-methoxymethyl acetanilide. Weed Sci. 17:441–444.Google Scholar
10. Handa, Y. P., Bains, I. S., Chahal, D. S., and Chapra, S. L. 1973. Microdetermination of residues of Lasso (2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-methoxymethyl acetanilide). J. Indian Chem. Soc. L:333–334.Google Scholar
11. McGahen, L. L. and Tiedje, J. M. 1978. Metabolism of two new acetylanilide herbicides, Antor herbicide (H-22234) and Dual (metolachlor) by the soil fungus Chaetomium globosum . J. Agric. Food Chem. 26:414–419.Google Scholar
12. Parochetti, J. V. 1973. Soil organic matter effect on activity of acetanilides, CDAA and atrazine. Weed Sci. 21:157–159.Google Scholar
13. Parochetti, J. V. 1978. Photodecomposition, volatility, and leaching of atrazine, simazine, alachlor, and metolachlor from soil and plant material. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., No. 17.Google Scholar
14. Peter, C. J. and Weber, J. B. 1985. Adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of metribuzin as influenced by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33:868–873.Google Scholar
15. Peter, C. J. and Weber, J. B. 1985. Adsorption and efficacy of trifluralin and butralin as influenced by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33:861–867.Google Scholar
16. Rahman, A. 1976. Effect of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of soil-applied herbicides – glasshouse studies. New Zealand J. of Exp. Agric. 4:85–88.Google Scholar
17. Rodgers, E. G. 1968. Leaching of seven s-triazines. Weed Sci. 16:117–120.Google Scholar
18. Tiedje, J. M. and Hagedorn, M. L. 1975. Degradation of alachlor by a soil fungus, Chaetomium globosum . J. Agric. Food Chem. 23:77–81.Google Scholar
19. Weber, J. B. and Peeper, T. F. 1977. Herbicide mobility in soils. Pages 73–78 in Truelove, B., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. South. Weed Sci. Soc., Auburn Printing, Auburn, AL.Google Scholar
20. Weber, J. B. and Peter, C. J. 1982. Adsorption, bioactivity, and evaluation of soil tests for alachlor, acetochlor, and metolachlor. Weed Sci. 30:14–20.Google Scholar
21. Weber, J. B. and Whitacre, D. M. 1982. Mobility of herbicides in soil columns under saturated- and unsaturated-flow conditions. Weed Sci. 30:579–584.Google Scholar
22. Zimdahl, R. L. and Clark, S. K. 1982. Degradation of three acetanilide herbicides in soil. Weed Sci. 30:545–548.Google Scholar