Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:29:32.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adsorption, Volatility, and Migration of Thiocarbamate Herbicides in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ephraim Koren ,
Chester L. Foy  and
Floyd M. Ashton
Ephraim Koren
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of California, Davis, California
Chester L. Foy
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg
Floyd M. Ashton
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of California, Davis, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relative adsorption and migration of four thiocarbamate herbicides were studied in five soil types. Pebulate (S-propylbutylethylthiocarbamate) was adsorbed to the greatest degree by any one of the soils or adsorbents used. EPTC (ethyl N-N-dipropylthiocarbamate) showed the least adsorption while ethyl N-ethyl-N-cyclohexylthiocarbamate (hereinafter referred to as R-2063) was intermediate. Charcoal and bentonite clay were very effective adsorbents while the soils varied in their ability to adsorb the herbicides. A correlation was found between the rate of adsorption and the amount of organic matter in the soil. Such correlation was not found with the clay content, but a multiple regression test showed that the clay content is also closely associated with adsorption. The leaching of EPTC, pebulate, R-2063, and S-2,3-dichloroallyl N,N-diisopropylthiolcarbamate (diallate) in soil columns was directly related to their solubilities in water and inversely related to the organic matter content of the soil. Incorporation of the herbicides into the upper 5 cm of the soil did not alter the pattern or depth of their leaching. The lateral diffusion of thiocarbamates in the soil was much more restricted than the leaching downward. Again, this movement was closely related to the water solubilities of the herbicides, to soil organic matter, and apparently to the vapor pressures of the herbicides. EPTC vapor loss was the greatest followed in order by pebulate and R-2063. The rate of vapor loss from soils of all of the herbicides tested was reduced when the soil properties enabled rapid infiltration and drying of the spray drops.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 1969 , pp. 148 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Antognini, J. 1958. Activity of EPTC as affected by soil moisture at time of application. Proc. NEWCC 12:398.Google Scholar
2. Ashton, F. M. and Sheets, T. J. 1959. The relationship of soil adsorption of EPTC to oats injury in various soil types. Weeds 7:88–90.Google Scholar
3. Bailey, G. W. and White, J. L. 1964. Review of adsorption and desorption of organic pesticides by soil colloids, with implications concerning herbicide bioactivity. J. Agr. Food Chem. 12:324–332.Google Scholar
4. Batchelder, G. H. and Patchett, G. G. 1960. A colorimetric method for the determination of EPTC residues in crops and soils. J. Agr. Food Chem. 8:214–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Fang, S. C., Theisen, Patricia, and Freed, V. H. 1961. Effects of water evaporation, temperature and rates of application on the retention of ethyl-N,N-di-n-propylthiolcarbamate in various soils. Weeds 9:569–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Gray, R. A. and Weierich, A. J. 1965. Factors affecting the vapor loss of EPTC from soils. Weeds 13:141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hartley, G. S. 1964. Herbicide behavior in the soil, p. 111–161. In Audus, L. J., The Physiology and Biochemistry of Herbicides. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
8. Jordan, L. S. and Day, B. E. 1962. Effects of soil properties on EPTC phytotoxicity. Weeds 10:212–215.Google Scholar
9. Mortland, M. M. and Meggitt, W. F. 1966. Interaction of ethyl-N, N-di-n-propylthiolcarbamate (EPTC) with montmorillonite. J. Agr. Food Chem. 14:126–129.Google Scholar
10. Sheets, T. J. 1959. Effects of soil type and time on the herbicidal activity of CDAA, CDEC, and EPTC. Weeds 7:442–448.Google Scholar
11. Upchurch, R. P. and Mason, D. D. 1962. The influence of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weeds 10:9–14.Google Scholar
12. Vernetti, J. and Freed, V. H. 1963. Vapor losses of thiolcarbamates and 2,4-D esters from soil as a function of vapor pressure. Res. Prog. Rep., WWCC p. 82–83.Google Scholar
13. Vernetti, J. and Freed, V. H. 1963. Soil behavior of four thiolcarbamates. Res. Prog. Rep., WWCC p. 89.Google Scholar