Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T06:57:36.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of genetic variation in wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) using molecular markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael Moodie ,
Robert P. Finch  and
George Marshall
Michael Moodie
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr, UK KA6 5HW
Robert P. Finch
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr, UK KA6 5HW
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Genetic variation was assessed in a range of populations of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. Sixty markers were used to assess the extent of genetic variation in wild mustard populations sampled throughout 12 different locations in the United Kingdom, including herbicide treated and untreated sites. In addition, selected sites were sampled over two consecutive seasons. Individual plant analysis was required, since a high degree of intra-population genetic variation was observed. The apparent extent of genetic variation in a population at one site increased when the results from two consecutive seasons were assessed. The range of genetic variation was as high in the herbicide-treated populations as in those which were untreated. Genetic diversity was maintained in populations of wild mustard where rotational cropping and herbicide use was practiced. These results confirm the utility of RAPD for the determination of genetic variation in outcrossing species where no prior genotypic knowledge is available.

Keywords

RAPDpopulation geneticsgenetic diversityDNA fingerprintingSINARWild mustardSinapis arvensis SINAR
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , February 1997 , pp. 102 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, J. K. and Warwick, S. I. 1993. Allozyme variation in native and introduced populations of Sinapis arvensi L. (Crucifera). in Proceedings of the 8th CruciferGenetics Workshop. Saskatoon, Canada. 1 [Abstract]:50 p.Google Scholar
Barnett, S.C.H. and Shore, J. S. 1990. Isozyme variation in colonizing plants. in Soltis, D. E. and Soltis, P. S., eds. Isozymes in Plant Biology. Portland, OR: Discorides Press, pp. 106–126.Google Scholar
Brenchley, W. E. 1918. Buried weed seeds. J. Agric. Sci. 9: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colosi, J. C. and Schaal, B. A. 1994. Weedy proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) is genetically variable and genetically distinct from crop varieties of proso millet. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Abs. 34: 98.Google Scholar
Digby, P.G.N. and Kempton, R. 1987. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Communities. London: Chapman and Hall. 206 p.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. 1980. Aspects of the population ecology of Charlock. J. Appl. Ecol. 17: 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogg, G. E. 1950. Biological flora of the British Isles. No. 146, Sinapis arvensis L. J. Ecol. 38: 415–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gower, J. C. 1985. Measures of similarity, dissimilarity, and distance. in Kotz, S., Johnson, N. L. and Read, C. B., eds. Encyclopaedia of Statistical Sciences, Vol. 5. New York: Wiley, pp. 397–405.Google Scholar
Jasienuik, M., Brule-Babel, A., and Morrison, I. N. 1996. The evolution and genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Sci. 44: 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lande, R. 1983. The response to selection on major and minor mutations affecting a metrical trait. Heredity 50: 47–65.Google Scholar
Lopez-Martinez, N., De Prado, R., Finch, R. P., and Marshall, G. 1995. A molecular assessment of genetic diversity in Echinochloa spp. in Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Weeds-1995, Volume 1. BCPC, Farnham, UK, pp. 445–450.Google Scholar
Mitchelson, K. R., Knox, O., Cheng, J., Ford, M. A., Wilson, F., and Atkinson, D. 1995. Molecular markers for genetic diversity in cleavers (Galium aparine). In Proceedings, Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Weeds-1995, Volume 1. BCPC, Farnham, UK, pp. 451–458.Google Scholar
Mouemar, A. A. and Gasquez, J. 1983. Environmental conditions and isozyme polymorphism in Chenopodium album L. Weed Res. 23: 141–149.Google Scholar
Mulligan, G. A. and Bailey, L. G. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. 8. Sinapis arvensis L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55: 171–183.Google Scholar
Piquot, Y., Saumitou-Laprade, P., Petit, D., Vernet, P., and Epplen, J. T. 1996. Genotypic diversity revealed by allozymes and oligonucleotide DNA fingerprinting in French populations of the aquatic macrophyte Sparganium erectum . Mol. Ecol. 5: 251–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richard, M., Jubier, M. F., Bajon, R., Gouyon, P. H., and Lejeune, B. 1995. A new hypothesis for the origin of pentaploid Holcus from diploid Holcus lanatus L. and tetraploid Holcus mollis L. in France. Mol. Ecol. 4: 29–38.Google Scholar
Soltis, D. E. and Soltis, P. S., eds. 1990. Isozymes in Plant Biology. Portland, OR: Discorides Press. 268 p.Google Scholar
Tanksley, S. D. and Orton, T. J., eds. 1983. Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding. Part A. New York: Elsevier. 516 p.Google Scholar
Tanksley, S. D., Young, N. D., Paterson, A. H., and Bonierbale, M. W. 1989. RFLP mapping in plant breeding: new tools for an old science. Bio/Technology 7: 257–264.Google Scholar
Warnes, D. D. and Anderson, R. N. 1984. Decline of wild mustard (Brassica kaber) seeds in soil under various cultural and chemical practices. Weed Sci. 32: 214–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, S. I. 1990a. Genetic variation in weeds—with particular reference to Canadian agricultural weeds. in Kawano, S., ed. Biological Approaches and Evolutionary Trends in Plants. London: Academic Press, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Warwick, S. I. 1990b. Allozyme and life history variation in five northwardly colonizing North American weed species. Plant Syst. Evol. 169: 41–54.Google Scholar
Warwick, S. I. 1991. The influence of intraspecific variation on the biology and control of agricultural weeds. In Proceedings, Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds-1991, Volume 3, pp. 997–1006.Google Scholar
Warwick, S. I. and Black, L. D. 1993. Electrophoretic variation in triazineresistant and -susceptible populations of the allogamous weed Brassica rapa . Weed Res. 33: 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, J. and McClelland, M. 1990. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 7213–7218.Google Scholar
Williams, J.G.K., Kubelik, A. R., Livak, K. J., Rafalski, J. A., and Tingey, S. V. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 6531–6535.Google Scholar
Yu, K. and Pauls, K. P. 1994. The use of analysis to tag genes and determine relatedness in heterogeneous plant populations using tetraploid alfalfa as an example. in PCR Technology: Current Innovations. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 201–214.Google Scholar