Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T03:39:39.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Common Genetic Basis in Sweet Corn Inbred Cr1 for Cross Sensitivity to Multiple Cytochrome P450-Metabolized Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jonathan N. Nordby
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
Martin M. Williams II*
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Invasive Weed Management Research, University of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
Jerald K. Pataky
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
Dean E. Riechers
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
Joseph D. Lutz
Affiliation:
General Mills Agriculture Research, LeSueur, MN 56058
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: Martin.Williams@ARS.USDA.GOV

Abstract

Nicosulfuron, mesotrione, dicamba plus diflufenzopyr, and carfentrazone are postemergence herbicides from different chemical families with different modes of action. An association between the sensitivity of sweet corn to these herbicides was observed when 143 F3 : 4 families (F4 plants) derived from of a cross between Cr1 (sensitive inbred) and Cr2 (tolerant inbred) were evaluated in greenhouse trials. The ratio of tolerant : segregating : sensitive families was not significantly different from a 3 : 2 : 3 ratio, which would be expected if a single gene conditioned herbicide response. Families cosegregated for responses to these herbicides. In field studies with 60 F3 : 5 families in 2005 and 120 F3 : 5 families in 2007, responses to these herbicides and foramsulfuron and primisulfuron were associated. Responses to bentazon in field trials were similar to the aforementioned herbicides for tolerant families, but differences were noted for families that were sensitive or segregated for responses to nicosulfuron, foramsulfuron, primisulfuron, mesotrione, dicamba plus diflufenzopyr, and carfentrazone. The gene(s) affecting herbicide sensitivity in Cr1 maps to the same region of chromosome 5S as a previously sequenced cytochrome P450 gene, where alleles previously designated nsf1 and ben1 were associated with sensitivity to nicosulfuron and bentazon and appear to be the result of a 392–base-pair insertion mutation. This work supports the hypothesis that a single recessive gene or closely linked genes in the sweet corn inbred Cr1 condition sensitivity to multiple cytochrome P450 enzyme-metabolized herbicides.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Barrett, M. 1995. Metabolism of herbicides by cytochrome P450. Drug Metab. Drug Interact. 12:299315.Google Scholar
Barrett, M. 2000. The role of cytochrome P450 enzymes in herbicide metabolism. Pages 2537. in Cobb, A. H. and Kirkwood, R. C. Herbicides and Their Mechanisms of Action. Boca Raton, FL CRC.Google Scholar
Barrett, M., Polge, N., Baerg, R., Bradshaw, R., and Poneleit, C. 1997. Role of cytochrome P450 in herbicide metabolism and selectivity and multiple herbicide metabolizing cytochrome P450 activities in maize. Pages 3550. in Hatzios, K. Regulation of Enzymatic Systems Detoxifying Xenobiotics in Plants. Dordrecht Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Boldt, L. D., Barrett, M., Poneleit, C. G., and Polge, N. D. 1992. Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase activity and cross-sensitivity to other herbicides of a bentazon-susceptible corn inbred. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 32:185.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, L. D., Barrett, M., and Poneleit, C. G. 1994. Inheritance of bentazon susceptibility in a corn (Zea mays) line. Weed Sci. 42:641647.Google Scholar
Diebold, S., Robinson, D., Zandstra, J., O'Sullivan, J., and Sikkema, P. H. 2003. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar sensitivity to AE F130360. Weed Technol. 17:127132.Google Scholar
Diebold, S., Robinson, D., Zandstra, J., O'Sullivan, J., and Sikkema, P. H. 2004. Sweet corn sensitivity to bentazon. Weed Technol. 18:982987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, A. A., Banks, P. A., and Legg, J. G. 1988. Differential response of maize inbreds to bentazon and other herbicides. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68:501507.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. and Ulrich, J. F. 1993. Response of corn (Zea mays L.) inbreds and hybrids to sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Sci. 41:508516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. M. and Williams, M. E. 2004. Correlation of corn (Zea mays) inbred response to nicosulfuron and mesotrione. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 44:4.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Bridges, D. C., Raymer, P., Day, D., and NeSmith, D. S. 2000. Differential tolerance of fresh market sweet corn cultivars to the herbicides nicosulfuron and primisulfuron. HortScience. 35:10701073.Google Scholar
Harms, C. T., Montoya, A. L., Privalle, L. S., and Briggs, R. W. 1990. Genetic and biochemical characterization of corn inbred lines tolerant to the sulfonylurea herbicide primisulfuron. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:353358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinz, J. R. R. and Owen, M. D. K. 1996. Nicosulfuron and primisulfuron selectivity in corn (Zea mays) and two annual grass weeds. Weed Sci. 44:219223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, M. S. 1993. Inheritance of susceptibility to nicosulfuron herbicide in maize. J. Hered. 84:216217.Google Scholar
Kreuz, K., Tommasini, R., and Martinoia, E. 1996. Old enzymes for a new job: herbicide detoxification in plants. Plant Physiol. 111:349353.Google Scholar
Landi, P., Vicari, A., and Catizone, P. 1989. Response of maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines and hybrids to chlorsulfuron. Weed Res. 29:265271.Google Scholar
Masiunas, J., Pataky, J., Sprague, C., Williams, M., and Wax, L. 2004. Sweet corn cultivar tolerance to mesotrione. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 44:58.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, J. and Bouw, W. J. 1998. Sensitivity of processing sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivars to nicosulfuron/rimsulfuron. Can. J. Plant Sci. 78:151154.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, J. and Sikkema, P. H. 2002. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar tolerance to primisulfuron. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82:261264.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, J., Sikkema, P. H., and Thomas, R. J. 2000. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar tolerance to nicosulfuron. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80:419423.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, J., Zandstra, J., and Sikkema, P. 2002. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar sensitivity to mesotrione. Weed Technol. 16:421425.Google Scholar
Pataky, J. K., Nordby, J. N., Williams, M. M. II, and Riechers, D. E. 2006. Inheritance of cross-sensitivity in sweet corn to herbicides applied postemergence. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Soc. 131:744751.Google Scholar
SAS 2000. SAS User's Guide. Version 8. Cary, NC SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Sweetser, P. B., Schow, G. S., and Hutchinson, J. M. 1982. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by plants: biological basis for selectivity of a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:1823.Google Scholar
Widstrom, N. W. and Dowler, C. C. 1995. Sensitivity of selected field corn inbreds (Zea mays) to nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 9:779782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. E., Sowinski, S., Dam, T., and Li, B. L. 2006. Map-based cloning of the nsf1 gene of maize. Pacific Grove, CA Program and Abstracts of the 48th Maize Genetics Conference.Google Scholar
Williams, M. M. II, Pataky, J. K., Nordby, J. N., Riechers, D. E., Sprague, C. L., and Masiunas, J. B. 2005. Cross-sensitivity in sweet corn to nicosulfuron and mesotrione applied postemergence. HortScience. 40:18011805.Google Scholar