Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

A comparative ecological risk assessment for herbicides used on spring wheat: the effect of glyphosate when used within a glyphosate-tolerant wheat system

  • Robert K. D. Peterson and Andrew G. Hulting (a1)

Glyphosate-tolerant spring wheat currently is being developed and most likely will be the first major genetically engineered crop to be marketed and grown in several areas of the northern Great Plains of the United States. The public has expressed concerns about environmental risks from glyphosate-tolerant wheat. Replacement of traditional herbicide active ingredients with glyphosate in a glyphosate-tolerant spring wheat system may alter ecological risks associated with weed management. The objective of this study was to use a Tier 1 quantitative risk assessment methodology to compare ecological risks for 16 herbicide active ingredients used in spring wheat. The herbicide active ingredients included 2,4-D, bromoxynil, clodinafop, clopyralid, dicamba, fenoxaprop, flucarbazone, glyphosate, MCPA, metsulfuron, thifensulfuron, tralkoxydim, triallate, triasulfuron, tribenuron, and trifluralin. We compared the relative risks of these herbicides to glyphosate to provide an indication of the effect of glyphosate when it is used in a glyphosate-tolerant spring wheat system. Ecological receptors and effects evaluated were avian (acute dietary risk), wild mammal (acute dietary risk), aquatic vertebrates (acute risk), aquatic invertebrates (acute risk), aquatic plants (acute risk), nontarget terrestrial plants (seedling emergence and vegetative vigor), and groundwater exposure. Ecological risks were assessed by integrating toxicity and exposure, primarily using the risk quotient method. Ecological risks for the 15 herbicides relative to glyphosate were highly variable. For risks to duckweed, green algae, groundwater, and nontarget plant seedling emergence, glyphosate had less relative risk than most other active ingredients. The differences in relative risks were most pronounced when glyphosate was compared with herbicides currently widely used on spring wheat.

Corresponding author
Corresponding author. Agricultural and Biological Risk Assessment, Department of Entomology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717-3020;
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

B. J. Bitzer , L. D. Buckelew , and L. P. Pedigo 2002. Effects of transgenic herbicide-resistant soybean varieties and systems on surface-active springtails (Entognatha: Collembola). Environ. Entomol 31:449461.

R. E. Blackshaw and K. N. Harker 2002. Selective weed control with glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol 16:885892.

D. D. Evans and M. J. Batty 1986. Effects of high dietary concentrations of glyphosate (Roundup) on a species of bird, marsupial and rodent indigenous to Australia. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 5:399401.

J. S. Fletcher , J. E. Nellessen , and T. G. Pfleeger 1994. Literature review and evaluation of the EPA Food-Chain (Kenaga) Nomogram, an instrument for estimating pesticide residues on plants. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 13:13831391.

L. G. Higley and W. K. Wintersteen 1992. A novel approach to environmental risk assessment of pesticides as a basis for incorporating environmental costs into economic injury levels. Am. Entomol 38:3439.

R. M. McPherson , W. C. Johnson , B. C. Mullinix Jr., W. A. Mills III, and F. S. Peebles 2003. Influence of herbicide tolerant soybean production systems on insect pest populations and pest-induced crop damage. J. Econ. Entomol 96:690698.

G. C. Nelson and D. S. Bullock 2003. Simulating a relative environmental effect of glyphosate-resistant soybeans. Ecol. Econ 45:189202.

J. D. Wolt , R. K. D. Peterson , P. Bystrak , and T. Meade 2003. A screening level approach for non-target insect risk assessment: transgenic Bt corn pollen and the monarch butterfly (Lepidoptera: Danaidae). Environ. Entomol 32:237246.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Science
  • ISSN: 0043-1745
  • EISSN: 1550-2759
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Abstract views

Total abstract views: 59 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 30th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.