Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T17:58:38.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of Kochia in Sugarbeets With Benzadox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. M. Weatherspoon
Affiliation:
Colorado State University, Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr. in cooperation with the Botany and Plant Pathology Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
E. E. Schweizer
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr. in cooperation with the Botany and Plant Pathology Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Abstract

Benzadox [(benzamidooxy)acetic acid] applied at 1, 2, 3, and 4 lb/A as a postemergence treatment controlled kochia [Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.] selectively in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris L.). Control increased as the rate of benzadox increased, but some kochia survived at the 4-lb/A rate. Competition from these plants reduced the yields of sugarbeet roots and sucrose. Where surviving kochia plants were removed by hand 7 weeks after emergence, all sugarbeets treated with benzadox yielded as well as the hand-weeded checks. In growth chamber studies, the activity of benzadox was increased by temperature and decreased by simulated rain which occurred within 4 hr following application. Under a temperature regime of 70 F day and 40 F night, if simulated rain was delayed for 8 hr, the control of kochia was identical to that obtained where no simulated rain followed treatment. The growth chamber studies confirmed our results with the performance of benzadox under different environmental conditions in the field.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1968. Extent and cost of weed control with herbicides and an evaluation of important weeds, 1965. U. S. Dep. Agr. ARS 34–102. 85 p.Google Scholar
2. Dubrovin, K. P., Gull, P. W., Zeisig, H. C., and Latham, A. J. 1966. Topcide, a new post-emergent herbicide for sugar beets. Proc. North Central Weed Contr. Conf. 20:4.Google Scholar
3. Rice, E. L. 1948. Absorption and translocation of ammonium 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate by bean plants. Bot. Gaz. 109: 301314.Google Scholar
4. Schweizer, E. E. and Weatherspoon, D. M. 1968. Herbicidal control of weeds in sugarbeets. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol. 15:263276.Google Scholar
5. Stevens, O. A. 1965. North Dakota Research Weed Development Notes. North Dakota Res. Rept. No. 1. 8 p.Google Scholar
6. Sullivan, E. F., Abrams, R. L., Bernhardt, D. W., and Wood, R. R. 1966. Chemical control of Kochia scoparia in sugar beets. Proc. North Central Weed Contr. Conf. 20:1314.Google Scholar
7. Weatherspoon, D. M. and Schweizer, E. E. 1969. Competition between kochia and sugarbeets. Weed Sci. 17:464467.Google Scholar