Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Cropping system effects on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) demography: I. Green manure and tillage timing

  • Adam S. Davis and Matt Liebman (a1)

Manipulation of cropping systems to improve weed management requires a better understanding of how crop- and soil-related factors affect weed life cycles. Our objective was to assess the impacts of timing of primary tillage and use of legume green manure on giant foxtail demography and soil properties. We measured giant foxtail seed survival and dormancy, seedling emergence and survival, and fecundity, in addition to soil phytotoxicity, chemical properties affecting soil fertility and soil water, in the transition between the wheat and corn phases of a wheat–corn–soybean crop sequence. Postdispersal predation of giant foxtail seeds was measured in all three phases of the crop sequence. Wheat was grown either as a sole crop (W) or underseeded with red clover (R), and residues from this phase were rototilled either in the fall (FT) or in spring (ST). There were strong interactions between Red clover and Tillage timing in their effects on giant foxtail recruitment and fecundity in corn. Giant foxtail seedling emergence was 30% lower, and time to 50% emergence was more than 1 wk later, in the ST/R treatment than in the ST/W, FT/W, and FT/R treatments, which did not differ. However, fecundity of giant foxtail was 200% greater in the ST/R treatment than in the other three treatments because of suppressed early corn growth. The net effect of the ST/R treatment on giant foxtail demography in corn was to greatly increase inputs to the seedbank compared with the ST/W, FT/W, and FT/R treatments. Giant foxtail demography in the wheat phase was also affected by Red clover. There was a 200% increase in daily rates of postdispersal seed predation in the wheat phase of the R treatment compared with the W treatment. High-seed predation in the wheat phase and low fecundity in the corn phase of the FT/R treatment suggest that population growth rate of giant foxtail will be lower in this treatment than in the other treatments. The degree of soil phytotoxicity from red clover residues, the changes in the amount of interference from the corn crop early in the growing season, and the differential suitability of crop residues in the different rotations as habitat for seed predators all contributed to changes in giant foxtail demography. Understanding the effects of cropping system characteristics on entire weed life cycles will facilitate the design of integrated suites of complementary weed management tactics.

Corresponding author
Corresponding author. Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-1010.
Hide All
ArntzA. M., DeLuciaE. H., and JordanN. 2000. From fluorescence to fitness: variation in photosynthetic rate affects fecundity and survivorship. Ecology 81:25672576.
Benech-ArnoldR. L., SanchezR. A., ForcellaF., KruckB. C., and GhersaC. M. 2000. Environmental control of dormancy in weed seed banks in soil. Field Crops Res 67:105122.
BlumenthalD. and JordanN. 2001. Weeds in field margins: a spatially explicit simulation analysis of Canada thistle population dynamics. Weed Sci 49:509519.
BrelandT. A. 1996. Phytotoxic effects of fresh and decomposing cover crop residues. Norw. J. Agric. Sci 10:355362.
BrownJ. R., PeckT. R., and BroudenS. et al. 1998. Recommended Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region. Columbia, MO: Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station. Pp. 1758.
BuhlerD. D. 1995. Influence of tillage systems on weed population dynamics and management in corn and soybean in the central USA. Crop Sci 35:12471258.
BuhlerD. D. 2002. Challenges and opportunities for integrated weed management. Weed Sci 50:273280.
BuhlerD. D. and HartzlerR. G. 2001. Emergence and persistence of seed of velvetleaf, common waterhemp, wooly cupgrass, and giant foxtail. Weed Sci 49:230235.
BuhlerD. D., KohlerK. A., and ThompsonR. L. 2001. Weed seed bank dynamics during a five-year crop rotation. Weed Technol 15:170176.
BuhlerD. D. and MesterT. C. 1991. Effect of tillage systems on the emergence depth of giant (Setaria faberi) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci 39:200203.
BurnhamK. P. and AndersonD. R. 1998. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. New York: Springer. Pp. 75117.
BurnsideO. C., WilsonR. G., WeisbergS., and HubbardK. G. 1996. Seed longevity of 41 weed species buried 17 years in eastern and western Nebraska. Weed Sci 44:7486.
BussanA. J. and BoerboomC. M. 2001a. Modeling the integrated management of giant foxtail in corn-soybean. Weed Sci 49:675684.
BussanA. J. and BoerboomC. M. 2001b. Modeling the integrated management of velvetleaf in a corn-soybean rotation. Weed Sci 49:3141.
CarmonaD. M. and LandisD. A. 1999. Influence of refuge habitats and cover crops on seasonal activity-density of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in field crops. Environ. Entomol 28:11451153.
CarmonaD. M., MenalledF. D., and LandisD. A. 1999. Gryllus pennsylvanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) laboratory weed seed predation and within field activity-density. J. Econ. Entomol 92:825829.
CaswellH. 2001. Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis and Interpretation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. Pp. 133174.
ConklinA. E., ErichM. S., LiebmanM., LambertD., GallandtE. R., and HaltemanW. A. 2002. Effects of red clover (Trifolium pratense) green manure and compost soil amendments on wild mustard (Brassica kaber) growth and incidence of disease. Plant Soil 238:245256.
CousensR. and MortimerM. 1995. Dynamics of Weed Populations. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 169216.
CromarH. E., MurphyS. D., and SwantonC. J. 1999. Influence of tillage and crop residue on postdispersal predation of weed seeds. Weed Sci 47:184194.
DabneyS. M., SchreiberJ. D., RothrockC. S., and JohnsonJ. R. 1996. Cover crops affect sorghum seedling growth. Agron. J 88:961970.
DavisA. S. and LiebmanM. 2001. Nitrogen source influences wild mustard growth and competitive effect on sweet corn. Weed Sci 49:558566.
DekkerJ. and HargroveM. 2002. Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp. V. Effects of gaseous environment on giant foxtail (Setaria faberii) (Poaceae) seed germination. Am. J. Bot 89:410416.
FauseyJ. C. and RennerK. A. 1997. Germination, emergence and growth of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum). Weed Sci 45:423427.
ForcellaF., ColbachN., and KegodeG. O. 2000. Estimating seed production of three Setaria species in row crops. Weed Sci 48:436444.
ForcellaF., WilsonR. G., and DekkerJ. et al. 1997. Weed seed bank emergence across the corn belt. Weed Sci 45:6776.
GallandtE. R., LiebmanM., PorterG. A., and UlrichS. D. 1998. Effects of pest and soil management systems on weed dynamics in potato. Weed Sci 46:238248.
GomezK. A. and GomezA. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley. Pp. 188189.
Gonzalez-AndujarJ. L. and Fernandez-QuintanillaC. 1991. Modelling the population dynamics of Avena sterilis under dry-land cereal cropping systems. J. Appl. Ecol 28:1627.
HoneymanM. S. and KentD. 2001. Performance of a Swedish deep-bedded feeder pig production system in Iowa. Am. J. Altern. Agric 16:5056.
JordanN. 1996. Weed prevention: priority research for alternative weed management. J. Prod. Agric 9:485490.
JordanN., MortensenD. A., PrenzlowD. M., and CoxK. C. 1995. Simulation analysis of crop rotation effects on weed seedbanks. Am. J. Bot 82:390398.
LiebmanM. and DavisA. S. 2000. Integration of soil, crop and weed management in low-external-input farming systems. Weed Res 40:2747.
LiebmanM. and GallandtE. R. 1997. Many little hammers: ecological approaches for management of crop-weed interactions. Pages 291343 in JacksonL. E. ed. Ecology in Agriculture. San Diego, CA: Academic.
LindquistJ. L., MaxwellB. D., BuhlerD. D., and GonsolusJ. L. 1995. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) recruitment, survival, seed production, and interference in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci 43:226232.
LindquistJ. L., MortensenD. A., and WestraP. et al. 1999. Stability of corn (Zea mays)-foxtail (Setaria spp.) interference relationships. Weed Sci 47:195200.
MenalledF. D., MarinoP. C., RennerK. A., and LandisD. A. 2000. Post-dispersal weed seed predation in Michigan crop fields as a function of agricultural landscape structure. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 77:193202.
MesterT. C. and BuhlerD. D. 1991. Effects of soil temperature, seed depth, and cyanazine on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seedling development. Weed Sci 39:204209.
MisraJ., PandeyH. N., TripathiR. S., and SahooU. K. 1992. Weed population dynamics under ‘jhum’ (slash and burn agriculture) and terrace cultivation in northeast India. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 41:285295.
MitchellR. J. 2001. Path analysis: pollination. Pages 217234 in ScheinerS. M. and GurevitchJ. eds. Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. New York: Oxford University Press.
MittelbachG. G. and GrossK. L. 1984. Experimental studies of seed predation in old fields. Oecologia 65:713.
NeterJ., KutnerM. H., NachtsheimC. J., and WassermanW. 1996. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Chicago: Irwin. Pp. 766773.
PetersJ. ed. 2000. Tetrazolium Testing Handbook. Contribution No. 29 to the Handbook on Seed Testing. Lincoln, NE: Association of Official Seed Analysts. Pp. 118, 151–154.
PinoJ., SansF. X., and MasallesR. M. 1998. Population dynamics of Rumex obtusifolius under contrasting lucerne cropping systems. Weed Res 38:2533.
RiceK. J. and MackR. N. 1991. Ecological genetics of Bromus tectorum. III. The demography of reciprocally sown populations. Oecologia 88:91101.
SheaK. and KellyD. 1998. Estimating biocontrol agent impact with matrix models: Carduus nutans in New Zealand. Ecol. Appl 8:824832.
Synergy Software. 1998. Kaleidagraph® v. 3.0.8, Macintosh Version. Reading, PA: Synergy Software.
TeasdaleJ. R. and MohlerC. L. 2000. The quantitative relationship between weed emergence and the physical properties of mulches. Weed Sci 48:385392.
UllrichS. D. 2000. Weed Population Dynamics in Potato Cropping Systems as Affected by Crop, Cultivation and Primary Tillage. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Plant, Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME. 171 p.
UnderwoodA. J. 1997. Experiments in Ecology: Their Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 178179.
VossR. D., SawyerJ. E., MallarinoA. P., and KillornR. 1999. General Guide for Crop Nutrient Recommendations in Iowa. Publ. PM-1688. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Extension, p. 3.
WangR. L., WendelJ. F., and DekkerJ. H. 1995. Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp. II. Genetic diversity and population genetic structure in S. glauca, S. geniculata, and S. faberii (Poaceae). Am. J. Bot 82:10311039.
WeaverS. E., TanC. S., and BrainP. 1988. Effect of temperature and soil moisture on time of emergence of tomatoes and four weed species. Can. J. Plant Sci 68:877886.
WilesL. J., BarlinD. H., SchweizerE. E., DukeH. R., and WhittD. E. 1996. A new soil sampler and elutriator for collecting and extracting weed seeds from soil. Weed Technol 11:3541.
WilkinsonL. 1999. SYSTAT® v. 9.0 for Windows. Chicago: SPSS.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Science
  • ISSN: 0043-1745
  • EISSN: 1550-2759
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 3 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 37 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 20th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.