Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T00:59:48.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of 2-Chloroethylphosphonic Acid on Dicamba Translocation in Wild Garlic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Larry K. Binning
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, Formerly at Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
William F. Meggitt
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan

Abstract

Foliar applications of 2-chloroethylphosphonic acid (CEPA) 7 days prior to spot applications of 14C-labelled 3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid (dicamba) to leaves of wild garlic (Allium vineale L.) increased basipetal translocation of the dicamba as measured 7 days after dicamba treatment. High concentrations of CEPA were inhibitory. The ethylene released from CEPA degradation may have altered the metabolic “sink-source” relationships within the wild garlic plants allowing increased basipetal translocation of subsequent applications of dicamba when low concentrations of CEPA were applied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bukovac, M. J., Zucconi, F., Larsen, R. P., and Kesner, C. O. 1969. Chemical promotion of fruit abscission in cherries and plums with special reference to 2-chloroethylphosphonic acid. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 94:226230.Google Scholar
2. Byers, R. E., Dostal, H. C., and Emerson, F. H. 1969. Regulation of fruit growth with 2-chloroethanephosphonic acid. BioSci. 19:903904.Google Scholar
3. Cooke, A. R. and Randall, D. I. 1968. 2-Haloethanephos-phonic acids as ethylene releasing agents for the induction of flowering in pineapples. Nature 218:974975.Google Scholar
4. Crafts, A. S. and Yamaguchi, S. 1964. The autoradiography of plant materials. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Ext. Serv. Manual 35. 143 p.Google Scholar
5. Eck, P. 1969. Effect of sprays of ethrel, alar, and malathion on anthocyanin content of early black cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpum Ait.). Hort. Sci. 4:224.Google Scholar
6. Edgerton, L. J. and Blanpied, G. D. 1968. Regulation of growth and fruit maturation with 2-chloroethanephosphonic acid. Nature 219:10641065.Google Scholar
7. Hull, R. J. 1970. Germination control of johnsongrass rhizome buds. Weed Sci. 18:118121.Google Scholar
8. Maynard, A. L. and Swan, J. M. 1963. Organophosphorus compounds. I. 2-chloroalkylphosphonic acid as phosphorylating agents. Australian J. Chem. 16:596608 Google Scholar
9. McMurray, A. L. and Miller, C. H. 1968. Cucumber sex expression modified by 2-chloroethanephosphonic acid. Science 162:13971398.Google Scholar
10. Morgan, P. W. 1969. Stimulation of ethylene evolution and abscission in cotton by 2-chloroethanephosphonic acid. Plant Physiol. 44:337341.Google Scholar
11. Peterson, R. and Myers, G. A. 1969. The effects of 2-chloroethylphosphonic acid on bud vascularization in Sorghum halepense L. Proc. No. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 24:7779.Google Scholar
12. Robinson, R. W., Shannon, S., and de la Guardia, M. D. 1969. Regulation of sex expression in the cucumber. BioSci. 19:141142.Google Scholar
13. Russo, L. Jr., Dostal, H. C. and Leopold, A. C. 1968. Chemical regulation of fruit ripening. BioSci. 18:109.Google Scholar
14. Wang, C. H. and Willis, D. L. 1965. Radiotracer Methodology in Biological Science. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 363 p.Google Scholar
15. Warner, H. L. and Leopold, A. C. 1967. Plant growth regulation by stimulation of ethylene production. BioSci. 17:772.Google Scholar