Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T18:37:04.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of DCPA on Seedling Infection by Root-Knot Nematode

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. Kent Romney ,
J. Lamar Anderson  and
Gerald D. Griffin
R. Kent Romney
Affiliation:
Dep. of Plant Sci., Utah State Univ., and Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agr., Logan, UT 84322
J. Lamar Anderson
Affiliation:
Dep. of Plant Sci., Utah State Univ., and Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agr., Logan, UT 84322
Gerald D. Griffin
Affiliation:
Dep. of Plant Sci., Utah State Univ., and Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agr., Logan, UT 84322
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Onion (Allium cepa L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seedlings grown in soil treated with DCPA (dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate) were less susceptible to northern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne hapla Chitwood) infection than seedlings grown in untreated soil. DCPA treatment of nematode larvae did not alter their pathogenicity. Resistance could be correlated with altered cell structure of the root epidermis, increased root exudate as evidenced by soil adherence, reduced fibrous root development, or both.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 1974 , pp. 51 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, J.L. and Griffin, G.D. 1972. Interaction of DCPA and trifluralin with seedling infection by root-knot nematode. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. 11–12.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, J.L. and Shaybany, B. 1972. Effects of DCPA on tomato hypocotyl tissue. Weed Sci. 20:434–439.Google Scholar
3. Apt, W.J., Austenson, H.M., and Courtney, W.D. 1960. Use of herbicides to break the life cycle of the bentgrass nematode, Anguina agrostis (Steinbuch 1799) Filipjev 1936. Plant Dis. Rep. 44:524–526.Google Scholar
4. Banks, D.J. 1970. Responses of nematode infected peanut plants to maleic hydrazide. Agron. J. 62:812–815.Google Scholar
5. Barrons, K.C. 1939. Studies of the nature of root-knot resistance. J. Agr. Res. 58:263–271.Google Scholar
6. Bingham, S.W. 1968. Effect of DCPA on anatomy and cytology of roots. Weed Sci. 16:449–452.Google Scholar
7. Chang, Chen-Hong and Smith, D.W. 1970. The effect of DCPA on mitosis of millet seedlings. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 23:321.Google Scholar
8. Courtney, W.D., Peabody, D.V. Jr., and Austenson, H.M. 1962. Effect of herbicides on nematodes in bentgrass. Plant Dis. Rep. 46:256–257.Google Scholar
9. Christie, J.R. 1936. The development of root-knot nematode galls. Phytopathology 26:1–22.Google Scholar
10. Crittenden, H.W. 1954. Factors associated with root-knot nematode resistance in soybeans. Phytopathology 44:388.Google Scholar
11. Franklin, M.T. 1970. Interrelationships of nematodes, weeds, herbicides and crops. Proc. Brit. Weed Contr. Conf. 10:927–933.Google Scholar
12. Jensen, W.A. 1962. Botanical histochemistry. Freeman, San Francisco. 408 pp.Google Scholar
13. Kochba, J. and Samish, R.M. 1972. Effect of growth inhibitors on root-knot nematodes in peach roots. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 97:178–180.Google Scholar
14. Krusberg, L.R. 1963. Host response to nematode infection. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1:219–240.Google Scholar
15. Nishimoto, R.K. and Warren, G.F. 1971. Stem abnormality induced by DCPA. Weed Sci. 19:343–346.Google Scholar
16. Nusbaum, C.J. 1958. The response of root-knot-infected tobacco plants to foliar applications of maleic hydrazide. Phytopathology 48:344.Google Scholar
17. Peacock, F.C. 1960. Inhibition of root-knot development on tomato by systemic compounds. Nematologica 5:219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Peacock, F.C. 1963. Systemic inhibition of root-knot eelworm (Meliodogyne incognita) on tomato. Nematologica 9:581–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Rohde, R.E. and Jenkins, W.R. 1958. Basis for resistance of Asparagus officinalis var. altius L. to the stubby root nematode Trichodorus christiei . Bull. Univ. Maryland Agr. Exp. Sta. A-97. 19 pp.Google Scholar
20. Rovira, A.D. 1969. Plant root exudates. Bot. Rev. 35:35–57.Google Scholar
21. Shaybany, B. and Anderson, J.L. 1972. Effects of chlorthal dimethyl on oat seedling anatomy. Weed Res. 12:164–168.Google Scholar
22. Webster, J.M. 1967. The influence of plant growth substances and their inhibitors on the host-parasite relationships of Aphelenchoides ritzemabosi in culture. Nematologica 13:256–262.Google Scholar
23. Webster, J.M. and Lowe, D. 1966. The effect of the synthetic plant growth substance 2,4-D on the host-parasite relationships of some plant parasitic nematodes in monoxemic callus culture. Parasitology 56:313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar