Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T02:42:24.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Nonionic Surfactants, Temperature, and Light on Germination of Weed Seeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Woodland Hurtt
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Weed Sci. Res., Ft. Detrick, Bldg. 1301, Frederick, MD 21701
Richard H. Hodgson
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Weed Sci. Res., Ft. Detrick, Bldg. 1301, Frederick, MD 21701

Abstract

The nonionic surfactants Tween 20 [oxysorbic (20 POE) polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate] and Tween 80 [oxysorbic (20 POE) polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate] at concentrations of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4% v/v stimulated germination of barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. # ECHCG] seeds in petri dishes. Stimulation occurred under both 30/20 and 25/15 C diurnal temperature cycles whether or not light was supplied during the 8-h high-temperature portion of the cycle. Barnyardgrass responded most to treatment under environmental conditions in which untreated seeds germinated the least. A 0.1% surfactant concentration often stimulated germination of weed seeds as effectively as did higher concentrations. Germination of redroot pigweed [Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMARE] seeds was inhibited by Tween 80 in the light under both the low- and high-temperature regimes and by Tween 20 at low temperature in the light. Germination of tumble pigweed (Amaranthus albus L. # AMAAL) seeds was inhibited by both surfactants in the high-temperature regime whether or not light was supplied. Common purslane (Portulaca oleracea L. # POROL) seeds were insensitive to treatment.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Burridge, L.O.W. and Jorgensen, E. 1971. Wetting agents: not always a plus in seed germination. Forest Chron. 47:286288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Egley, G. H. and Duke, S. O. 1985. Physiology of weed seed dormancy and germination. Pages 2764 in Duke, S. O., ed. Weed Physiology. Vol. I. Reproduction and Ecophysiology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
3. Egley, G. H., Duke, S. O., and Hurtt, W. 1986. Influence of endogenous nitrate upon germination of light-sensitive common purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.). Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. No. 184.Google Scholar
4. Endo, R. M., Letey, J., Valoras, N., and Osborn, J. F. 1969. Effects of nonionic surfactants on monocots. Agron. J. 61:850854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Helwig, J. T. and Council, K. A. 1979. SAS User's Guide. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. 494 pp.Google Scholar
6. Hurtt, W. and Taylorson, R. B. 1986. Chemical manipulation of weed emergence. Weed Res. 26:259267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Jansen, L. L., Gentner, W. A., and Shaw, W. C. 1961. Effects of surfactants on the herbicidal activity of several herbicides in aqueous spray systems. Weeds 9:381405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Knypl, J. S. 1977. Tween surfactants stimulate growth of Amaranthus seedlings. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. Bd. 81:147152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. McWhorter, C. G. 1982. The use of adjuvants. Pages 1025 in Hodgson, R. H., ed. Adjuvants for Herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
10. McWhorter, C. G. 1985. The physiological effects of adjuvants on plants. Pages 141158 in Duke, S. O., ed. Weed Physiology. Vol. II. Herbicide Physiology. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
11. Norris, R. F. 1982. Action and fate of adjuvants in plants. Pages 6883 in Hodgson, R. H., ed. Adjuvants for Herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
12. Parr, J. F. 1982. Toxicology of adjuvants. Pages 93114 in Hodgson, R. H., ed. Adjuvants for Herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
13. Roberts, E. H. 1972. Dormancy: A factor affecting weed survival in the soil. Pages 321359. in Roberts, E. H., ed. Viability of Seeds. Syracuse Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Roberts, H. A. 1983. Weed seeds in horticultural soils. Sci. Hortic. 34:111.Google Scholar
15. Schweizer, E. E. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1984. Weed seed decline in irrigated soil after rotation of crops and herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:8489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Spurrier, E. C. and Jackobs, J. A. 1955. Some effects of an anionic sodium sulfonate type surfactant upon plant growth. Agron. J. 47:462465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Steebner, D. H. and Belcher, E. 1979. The influence of WEX on germination of pine seed. Tree Plant. Notes 30:29.Google Scholar
18. Taylorson, R. B. and Brown, M. M. 1977. Accelerated afterripening for overcoming seed dormancy in grass weeds. Weed Sci. 25:473476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar