Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T09:02:50.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Tillage and Application Method on Clomazone, Imazaquin, and Imazethapyr Persistence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

William S. Curran
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
Rex A. Liebl
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
F. William Simmons
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801

Abstract

Effects of tillage and herbicide application method on the persistence and residual activity of clomazone, imazaquin, and imazethapyr were investigated in a 2-yr field study. Herbicides were applied preemergence and preplant incorporated to conventional- and reduced-tillage soybeans in 1987 and 1988. Herbicide dissipation was monitored using chromatographic and bioassay techniques. In 1987, dissipation rates for clomazone, imazaquin, and imazethapyr were similar, regardless of tillage system or application method. In 1988, all three herbicides applied preplant incorporated dissipated more slowly than in preemergence treatments. Corn planted in rotation in 1989 displayed greater levels of injury in the incorporated treatments for all three herbicides. Although herbicide concentrations were similar 322 d following application in both tillage treatments in 1989, corn injury was greater with imazaquin and imazethapyr and less with clomazone in the reduced-tillage plots than in the conventional-tillage treatments.

Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1987. Command Facts. Lesson No. 2. FMC Corp., Philadelphia, PA 19103.Google Scholar
2. Basham, G. W., Lavy, T. L., Oliver, L. R., and Scott, H. D. 1987. Imazaquin persistence and mobility in three Arkansas Soils. Weed Sci. 35:576582.Google Scholar
3. Basham, G. W. and Lavy, T. L. 1987. Microbial and photolytic dissipation of imazaquin in soil. Weed Sci. 35:865870.Google Scholar
4. Buchanan, G. A. and Hiltbold, A. E. 1973. Performance and persistence of atrazine. Weed Sci. 21:413416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Burnside, O. C. 1974. Prevention and detoxification of pesticide residues in soil. Pages 387412 in Guenzi, W. D., ed. Pesticides in Soil and Water. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
6. Cheng, H. H. and Lehmann, R. G. 1985, Characterization of herbicide degradation under field conditions. Weed Sci. 33(Suppl. 2):710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Curran, W. S. 1990. Rotation crop injury potential for corn following clomazone, chlorimuron, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Illinois, Urbana. 110 pp.Google Scholar
8. Goetz, A. J., Lavy, T. L., and Gebur, E. E. Jr. 1990. Degradation and field persistence of imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 38:421428.Google Scholar
9. Halstead, S. J. and Harvey, R. G. 1986. Off-site movement of FMC-57020: 1986 trials. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:42.Google Scholar
10. Halstead, S. J. and Harvey, R. G. 1985. Factors affecting offsite movement of FMC-57020. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40:88.Google Scholar
11. Hartzler, R. G., Fawcett, R. S., and Owen, M.D.K. 1989. Effects of tillage on trifluralin residue carryover injury to corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 37:609615.Google Scholar
12. Hiltbold, A. E. 1974. Persistence of pesticides in soil. Pages 203222 in Guenzi, W. D., ed. Pesticides in Soil and Water. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
13. Koppatschek, F. K., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Application timing and corn (Zea mays) residue effects on weed control from metribuzin and metolachlor. Weed Sci. 37:345349.Google Scholar
14. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Availability and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in soil. Weed Sci. 37:259267.Google Scholar
15. McGlamery, M. D., Pike, D. R., Knake, E. L., Curran, W. S., and Anderson, C. D. 1990. Weed control for corn, soybeans, and sorghum. Page 139145 in Univ. Illinois Coll. Agric. Circ. no. 1277–90. Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
16. Messersmith, C. G., Burnside, O. C., and Lavy, T. L. 1971. Biological and non-biological dissipation of trifluralin from soil. Weed Sci. 19:285289.Google Scholar
17. Mills, J. A., Witt, W. W., and Barrett, M. 1989. Effects of tillage on the efficacy and persistence of clomazone in soybean (Glycine max) . Weed Sci. 37:217222.Google Scholar
18. Mills, J. A. and Witt, W. W. 1989. Efficacy, phytotoxicity, and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in no-till double-crop soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:353359.Google Scholar
19. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Leavitt, R. A. 1988. Influence of rate, method of application, and tillage on imazaquin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 36:9095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Savage, K. E. and Barrentine, W. L. 1969. Trifluralin persistence as affected by depth of soil incorporation. Weed Sci. 17:349352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Shea, P. J. 1985. Detoxification of herbicide residues in soil. Weed Sci. 33(Suppl. 2):3341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Thelen, K. D., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1988. Comparison of application methods and tillage practices on volatilization of clomazone. Weed Technol. 2:323326.Google Scholar
23. Walker, A. and Bond, W. 1977. Persistence of the herbicide AC 92,553 [N-(1-ethylpropyl)-2,6-dinitro-3,4-xylidine] in soils. Pestic. Sci. 8:359365.Google Scholar