Skip to main content

Evaluation of Dicamba Persistence among Various Agricultural Hose Types and Cleanout Procedures Using Soybean (Glycine max) as a Bio-Indicator

  • Gary T. Cundiff (a1), Daniel B. Reynolds (a1) and Thomas C. Mueller (a2)

Synthetic rubbers, synthetic plastic polymers (polyvinyl chlorides [PVC]), polyurethane blends, and polyethylene blends make up modern-day agricultural spray hoses. The objective of this study was to determine whether agricultural hose types would differ with respect to 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid (dicamba) sequestration. Field and greenhouse studies were conducted to evaluate the sequestration potential of dicamba within five agricultural hose types when cleaned with different cleanout procedures. Rinsate solutions were applied to soybean, which was used as a bio-indicator to test for cleanout efficiency. Differences among hose types and cleanout procedures exist with observations including soybean injury, height reduction, dry matter, yield, and part per million by volume (ppmv) analyte retained. The makeup of PVC polyurethane-blend and synthetic rubber–blend hoses increased retention of dicamba analyte when compared with the polyethylene blend hose. No differences were observed after the addition of ammonia to the cleanout solution when compared with water alone. Differences in a hose type’s ability to sequester the dicamba analyte may have more to do with the hose’s internal chemical composition, manufacturing process, and composition breakdown. Scanning electron microscopy revealed imperfections in new PVC polyurethane and synthetic rubber hoses that eventually lead to inner wall depletion of these hose types. This is in contrast to what was found in the polyethylene-blend hose type, in which the inner wall is smooth and free of imperfections.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author’s E-mail:
Hide All

Associate Editor for this paper: Timothy L. Grey, University of Georgia

Hide All
Al-Khatib K, Peterson D (1999) Soybean (Glycine max) response to simulated drift from selected sulfonylurea herbicides, dicamba, glyphosate, and glufosinate. Weed Technol 13:264270
Andersen SM, Clay SA, Wrage LJ, Matthees D (2004) Soybean foliage residues of dicamba and 2,4-D and correlation to application rates and yield. Agron J l 96:750760
Boerboom C (2004) Field case studies of dicamba movement to soybeans. Pages 406–408 in Wisconsin Crop Management Conference: 2004 Proceedings Papers. University of Wisconsin–Madison
Heap I (2016) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Accessed: 2013
Johnson WG, Hallett SG, Legleiter TR, Whitford F, Weller SC, Bordelon BP, Lerner BR (2012) 2,4-D and Dicamba-Tolerant Crops—Some Facts to Consider. Purdue Extension. ID-453-W. 7 p
Kelley KB, Riechers DE (2003) Gene expression analysis of auxinic herbicide injury in soybeans. Abstr Weed Sci SocAm 43:105
Sciumbato AS, Chandler JM, Senseman SA, Bovey RW, Smith KL (2004) Determining exposure to auxin-like herbicides. II. Practical application to quantify volatility. Weed Technol 18:11351142
Steckel L, Chism C, Thompson A (2005) Cleaning Plant Growth Regulator (PGR) Herbicides Out of Field Sprayers. University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service W071. 3 p
University of Illinois Extension Service (Bretthauer S) (2006) Illinois Pesticide Review. Pesticide Safety Education Program September newsletter. Accessed: 2016
Wax LM, Knuth LA, Slife FW (1969) Response of soybeans to 2,4-D, dicamba, and picloram. Weed Sci 17:388393
Weidenhamer JD, Triplett GB, Sobotka FE (1989) Dicamba injury to soybean. Agron J 81:637643
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Science
  • ISSN: 0043-1745
  • EISSN: 1550-2759
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 31
Total number of PDF views: 114 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 622 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 13th February 2017 - 16th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.