Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Extractable and Germinable Seedbank Methods Provide Different Quantifications of Weed Communities

  • Theresa Reinhardt (a1) and Ramon G. Leon (a2)
Abstract

Seedbank sampling and quantification methods vary in their ability to describe weed diversity and density, so proper method selection is critical for studying weed communities. The germinable seedbank (GSB) method is commonly preferred over extractable seedbank method (ESB), because the latter is more time-consuming. However, these two methods have only been compared using a few weed species and a relatively small number of samples. A total of 204 weed seedbank samples were used to compare both methods for weed density, richness, evenness, and Shannon-Weiner diversity using a split-sample approach. The two methods yielded dramatically different results. The ESB had 418% higher density and 35% more species per sample but 11% less evenness than the GSB. Diversity was estimated to be only 9% higher using the extractable compared with the germinable method. While the extractable method had higher density and richness overall, this was not true for every species, with only 7 of 14 common species detected in higher amounts by the extractable method. The results indicate the two methods are not strongly correlated, limiting the possibility of generating a conversion factor between methods. Nevertheless, evenness and Shannon-Weiner diversity might allow comparisons between both methods when the emphasis is on characterizing predominant weed species. The GSB is a practical approach to compare treatments or conditions; however, the ESB is more useful to accurately quantify weed species richness, diversity, and density.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Author for correspondence: Ramon G. Leon, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695. (Email: rleon@ncsu.edu)
References
Hide All
Abella, SR, Chiquoine, LP Vanier, CH (2013) Characterizing soil seed banks and relationships to plant communities. Plant Ecol 214:703715
Ball, DA Miller, SD (1989) A comparison of techniques for estimation of arable soil seedbanks and their relationship to weed flora. Weed Res 29:365373
Buhler, DD Maxwell, BD (1993) Seed separation and enumeration from soil using K2CO3-centrifugation and image analysis. Weed Sci 41:298302
Cardina, J Sparrow, DH (1996) A comparison of methods to predict weed seedling populations from the soil seedbank. Weed Sci 44:4650
Espeland, EK, Perkins, LB Leger, EA (2010) Comparison of seed bank estimation techniques using six weed species in two soil types. Rangeland Ecol Manag 63:243247
Forcella, F (1992) Prediction of weed seedling densities from buried weed reserves. Weed Res 32:2938
Gonzalez, SL Ghermandi, L (2012) Comparison of methods to estimate soil seed banks: the role of seed size and mass. Community Ecol 13:238242
Gross, KL (1990) A comparison of methods for estimating seed numbers in the soil. J Ecol 78:10791093
Gross, KL Renner, KA (1989) A new method for estimating seed numbers in the soil. Weed Sci 37:836839
Hoffman, ML, Owen, MD Buhler, DD (1998) Effects of crop and weed management on density and vertical distribution of weeds in the soil. Agron J 90:793799
Koellner, T, Hersperger, AM Wohlgemuth, T (2004) Rarefaction method for assessing plant species diversity on a regional scale. Ecography 27:532544
Leon, RG Wright, DL (2018) Recurrent changes of weed seed bank density and diversity in crop−livestock systems. Agron J 110:10691078
Leon, RG, Wright, DL Marois, JJ (2015) Weed seed banks are more dynamic in a sod-based rotation, than in a conventional, peanut−cotton rotation. Weed Sci 63:877–867
Malone, CR (1967) A rapid method for enumeration of viable seeds in soil. Weeds 15:381382
Marshall, EJP Arnold, GM (1994) Weed seed banks in arable fields under contrasting pesticide regimes. Ann App Biol 125:349360
Mesgaran, MB, Mashhadi, HR, Zand, E Alizadeh, HM (2007) Comparison of three methodologies for efficient seed extraction in studies of soil weed seedbanks. Weed Res 47:472478
Price, JN, Wright, BR, Gross, CL Whalley, WRDB (2010) Comparison of seedling emergence and seed extraction techniques for estimating the composition of soil seedbanks. Methods Ecol Evol 1:151157
Rotches-Ribalta, R, Blanco-Moreno, JM, Armengot, L, Chamorro, L Sans, FX (2015) Both farming practices and landscape characteristics determine the diversity of characteristics and rare arable weeds in organically managed fields. Appl Veg Sci 18:423431
Sosnoskie, LM, Herms, CP Cardina, J (2006) Weed seed bank community composition in a 35-yr-old tillage and rotation experiment. Weed Sci 54:263273
Ter Heerdt, GNJ, Verweij, GL, Bekker, RM Bakker, JP (1996) An improved method for seed-bank analysis: seedling emergence after removing the soil by sieving. Funct Ecol 10:144151
Tsuyuzaki, S (1994) Rapid seed extraction from soils by a floatation method. Weed Res 34:433436
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Science
  • ISSN: 0043-1745
  • EISSN: 1550-2759
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed