Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:20:11.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Affecting Germination of Dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium) and Yankeeweed (Eupatorium compositifolium)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gregory E. Macdonald ,
Barry J. Brecke  and
Donn G. Shilling
Gregory E. Macdonald
Affiliation:
Univ. Florida, Agron. Dep. Gainesville, FL 32611
Barry J. Brecke
Affiliation:
Univ. Florida, Agron. Dep. Gainesville, FL 32611
Donn G. Shilling
Affiliation:
Univ. Florida, Agron. Dep. Gainesville, FL 32611
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the effect of various factors on germination of dogfennel and yankeeweed. Dogfennel seed were found to be strongly photoblastic with no germination in the dark. Yankeeweed seed were moderately photoblastic, with 12% germination occurring in the absence of light Germination for both species increased in response to red light (650 nm), indicating phytochrome regulation. At the soil surface, dogfennel and yankeeweed emergence was 40 and 48%, respectively, but declined rapidly with increasing soil depths where dogfennel germination was lower than that of yankeeweed. Yankeeweed germination was 60 to 75% from 10 to 30 C while dogfennel germination was 45 to 70% between 15 to 30 C. Both species germinated over a broad range of pH (6 to 10) with the highest germination occurring at pH 8. Yankeeweed and dogfennel were moderately tolerant to water stress, but yankeeweed tolerated higher water stress than dogfennel. Both species germinated over a wide range of conditions, possibly enhancing adaptation to many diverse environments.

Keywords

Dogfennel, Eupatorium capillifolium (Lam.) Small # EUPCAyankeeweed, Eupatorium compositifolium Walt. # EUPCOGerminationphytochromewater stresslight qualityplanting depthtemperatureEUPCAEUPCO
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 424 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adkins, S. W., Simpson, G. M., and Naylor, J. M. 1985. The physiological basis of seed dormancy in Avena fatua. VII. Action of organic acids and pH. Physiol. Plant. 65:310–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Black, M. 1969. Light controlled germination of seeds. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 23:193.Google Scholar
3. Egley, G. H. and Duke, S. O. 1984. Physiology of weed seed dormancy and germination. Pages 27–64 in Duke, S. O., Ed. Weed Physiology. Volume I. Reproduction and Ecophysiology. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
4. Evetts, L. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1972. Germination and seedling development of common milkweed and other species. Weed Sci. 20:371–378.Google Scholar
5. Fernandez-Quinantilla, C., Gonzalez Andujar, J. L., and Appleby, A. P. 1990. Characterization of the germination and emergence response to temperature and soil moisture of Avena fatua and Avena sterilis . Weed Res. 30:289–295.Google Scholar
6. Jain, R. and Singh, M. 1989. Factors affecting goatweed (Scoparia dulcis) germination. Weed Sci. 37:766–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Jauzein, P. 1989. Photosensibilite des bromes annuels (Bromus L. spp.). Weed Res. 29:53–63.Google Scholar
8. Labouriau, L. G. 1978. Seed germination as a thermobiological problem. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 15:345.Google Scholar
9. Mayer, A. M. and Poljakoff-Mayber, A. 1982. Pages 22–47 in The Germination of Seeds. 3rd ed. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
10. Maurushat, H. D. 1969. Natural hybridization in dogfennel (Eupatorium spp., Compositae). M.S. Thesis, Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL.Google Scholar
11. Moore, R. P., ed. 1985. Handbook on Tetrazolium Testing. Int. Seed Testing Assoc., Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
12. Nelson, L. R., Barber, B. L., and Gjerstad, D. H. 1984. Sulfmeturon methyl and AC-252,925 for control of herbaceous weeds in newly established pine plantations. Proc. SWSS. 37:192.Google Scholar
13. Radford, A. E., Ahles, H. E., and Bell, C. R. 1968. Pages 1054–1057 in Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. Univ. of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
14. Rai, J.P.N. 1987. Effect of temperature, imbibition and light on achene germination of two weedy species of Eupatorium . Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., Plant Sci. 97:325–332.Google Scholar
15. Small, J. K. 1933. Page 1323 in Manual of the Southern Flora. Univ. North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
16. Smith, H. 1975. Phytochrome and Photomorphogenesis. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
17. Stucky, J. M. 1980. Pages 22–23 in identifying seedling and mature weeds common in the southeastern United States. North Carolina State Agric. Ext. Serv. Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
18. Sullivan, V. I. 1972. Pollen and pollination in the genus Eupatorium (Compositae). Can. J. Bot. 53(6):582–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Taylorson, R. B. 1987. Environmental and chemical manipulation of weed seed dormancy. Rev. Weed Sci. 3:135–154.Google Scholar
20. Woolley, J. T. and Stoller, F. W. 1978. Light penetration and light-induced seed germination in soil. Plant Physiol. 61:597.Google Scholar