Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-gs9qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T16:33:07.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geostatistics for Mapping Weeds, with a Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Patch as a Case Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

William W. Donald
William W. Donald*
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv. Biosciences Res. Lab., and Dep. Crop and Weed Sci., N.D. State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Geostatistical methods were used to describe and map nonrandom distribution and variation (standard deviation) of shoot density and root growth across a well-established patch of Canada thistle, a perennial weed. Semivariogram functions and kriging, an interpolation method, were used to prepare isoarithmic contour maps and associated error maps. Maps consisted of interpolated contours of uniform weed density and other measured or calculated regionalized variables between measured X-Y control points, as well as maps of error (standard deviation) associated with contour estimation. Mapped regions of greatest shoot density across a patch not only had the greatest underlying root biomass and, often, greatest density of adventitious root buds, but also had more deeply growing root biomass.

Keywords

Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. # CIRARAdventitious root budsdensitygrowthmappingpatchrootsemivarianceshootsspatial statisticsspatial dependence

Information

Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 648 - 657
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Amor, R. L. and Harris, R. V. 1975. Seedling establishment and vegetative spread of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. in Victoria, Australia. Weed Res. 15:407–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Burgess, T. M. and Webster, R. 1980. Optimal interpolation and isoarithmic mapping of soil properties II. Block kriging. J. Soil Sci. 31:333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Campbell, J. B. 1978. Spatial variation of sand content and pH within single contiguous delineations of two soil mapping units. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42:460–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Carlson, S. J. and Donald, W. W. 1986. A washer for removing thickened roots from soil. Weed Sci. 34:794–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Clark, I. 1979. Practical Geostatistics. Applied Science Publ., Ltd., London. 127 pp.Google Scholar
6. Donald, W. W. 1994. The biology of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Rev. Weed Sci. 6 (in press).Google Scholar
7. Donald, W. W. 1992. Herbicidal control of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. roots and shoots in no-till spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Res. 32:259–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Donald, W. W. 1992. Fall-applied herbicides for Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) root and root bud control in reduced-till spring wheat. Weed Technol. 6:252–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Donald, W. W. 1993. Root versus shoot measurements to evaluate recovery of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) after several years of control treatments. Can. J. Plant Sci. 73:369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Donald, W. W. and Prato, T. 1992. Efficacy and economics of herbicides for Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) control in no-till spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 40:233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Donald, W. W. and Prato, T. 1992. Effectiveness and economics of repeated sequences of herbicides for Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) control in reduced-till spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Can. J. Plant Sci. 72:599–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Gajem, Y. M., Warrick, A. W., and Myers, D. E. 1981. Spatial dependence of physical properties of a Typic Torrifluvent soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45:709–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Gambolati, G. and Volpi, G. 1979. A conceptual deterministic analysis of the kriging technique in hydrology. Water Resources Res. 15:625–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Hofsten, A.C.G. von. 1947. Akersenapens forekomst som orgrasbestand och som froforrad i jorden [The occurrence of yellow charlock as weed growth and as a seed supply in the soil]. Vaxtodling 2:175–182.Google Scholar
15. Journel, A. G. and Hujbregts, C. J. 1978. Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press, New York. 600 p.Google Scholar
16. Marshall, E.J.P. 1988. Field-scale estimates of grass weed populations in arable land. Weed Res. 28:191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Marshall, E.J.P. 1988. The ecology and management of field margin floras in England. Outlook Agric. 17:178–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Marshall, E.J.P. 1989. Distribution patterns of plants associated with arable field edges. J. Appl. Ecol. 26:247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Moore, R. J. and Frankton, C. 1974. The Thistles of Canada. Can. Dep. Agric. Monogr. 10.Google Scholar
20. Nadeau, L. B. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1989. The root system of Cariada thistle. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69:1199–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Nadeau, L. B. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1990. The effects of supplemental nitrogen on shoot production and root bud dormancy of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) under field conditions. Weed Sci. 38:379–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Nielsen, D. R. and Alemi, M. H. 1989. Statistical opportunities for analyzing spatial and temporal heterogeneity of field soils. Plant Soil 115:285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Pavlychenko, T. K. 1943. Herbicidal action of chemicals on perennial weeds. Sci. Agric. 23:409–420.Google Scholar
24. Perrier, E. R. and Wilding, L. P. 1986. An evaluation of computational methods for field uniformity studies. Adv. Agron. 39:265–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Peschken, D. P. and Wilkinson, A.T.S. 1981. Biocontrol of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense): releases and effectiveness of Ceutorhynchus litura (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Canada. Can. Entomol. 113:777–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Phillips, D. L., Dolph, J., and Marks, D. 1992. A comparison of geostatistical procedures for spatial analysis of precipitation in mountainous terrain. Agric. For. Meteorol. 58:119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Robinson, J. E. 1982. Pages 2, 3, 35 in Computer Applications in Petroleum Geology. Hutchinson Ross Publ. Co., Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
28. Stachon, W. J. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Allelopathic activity of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in Colorado. Weed Sci. 28:83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Trangmar, B. B., Yost, R. S., and Uehara, G. 1985. Application of geostatistics to spatial studies of soil properties. Adv. Agron. 38:45–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Warrick, A. W., Myers, D. E., and Nielsen, D. R. 1986. Geostatistical methods applied to soil science. Pages 53–82 in Klute, A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part. 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd ed. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Inc., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
31. Webster, R. 1985. Quantitative spatial analysis of soil in the field. Adv. Soil Sci. 3:1–70.Google Scholar
32. Wiles, L. J., Oliver, G. W., York, A. C., Gold, H. J., and Wilkerson, G. G. 1992. Spatial distribution of broadleaf weeds in North Carolina soybean (Glycine max) fields. Weed Sci. 40:554–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Wilson, R. G. Jr. 1981. Effect of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) residue on growth of some crops. Weed Sci. 29:159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar