Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T04:43:05.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Germination and Seedling Development of Bigroot Morningglory (Ipomoea pandurata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael J. Horak  and
Loyd M. Wax
Michael J. Horak
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
Loyd M. Wax
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies were undertaken to determine effects of scarification, temperature, stratification, pH, and osmotic potential on seed germination; to determine the effect of planting depth on emergence; to describe the emergence sequence; and to quantify seedling development of bigroot morningglory. Mechanical and chemical scarification caused increased germination but cool, moist stratification did not break dormancy. Optimum germination occurred at 20 and 25 C and with alternating temperatures of 20/10 and 30/20 C. The optimum pH range for germination was between 6 and 8.5. Increasing the solution osmotic potential decreased germination linearly from 90% at −0.08 MPa to 0% at −0.8 MPa. Plant establishment was best at 2 to 4 cm and decreased at greater seeding depths. Seedling emergence was observed and recorded and found not to fit the classical models of hypogeal or epigeal emergence. Only 3% of 5-day-old seedlings sprouted after being clipped to the root crown. When seedlings were 11 days old at clipping, over 85% of the plants sprouted. These results indicate that bigroot morningglory has the potential to successfully reproduce by seed and that the rapid development of the plant should be considered when designing control programs.

Keywords

Bigroot morninggloryIpomoea pandurata (L.) G.F.W. Meyer ♯ IPOPAScarificationtemperaturestratificationpHmoisture stressemergence sequence
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 390 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brown, E. O. and Porter, R. H. 1942. The viability and germination of seeds of Convolvulus arvensis L. and other perennial weeds. Iowa Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 294.Google Scholar
2. Clark, W. M. and Lubs, H. A. 1916. Hydrogen electrode potentials of phthalate phosphate, and borate buffer mixtures. J.B.C. 25:479.Google Scholar
3. Cole, A. W. and Coats, G. E. 1973. Tall morningglory germination response to herbicides and temperature. Weed Sci. 21:443–446.Google Scholar
4. Colowick, S. P. and Kaplan, N. O. 1955. Page 143 in Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
5. Crowley, R. H., and Buchanan, G. A. 1980. Response of Ipomoea spp. and smallflower morningglory (Jacquemontia tamnifolia) to temperature and osmotic stresses. Weed Sci. 28:76–82.Google Scholar
6. Evetts, L. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1972. Germination and seedling development of common milkweed and other species. Weed Sci. 20:371–378.Google Scholar
7. Gomes, L. F., Chandler, J. M., and Vaughan, C. E. 1978. Aspects of germination, emergence, and seed production of three Ipomoea taxa. Weed Sci. 26:245–248.Google Scholar
8. Hackett, N. M. and Murray, D. S. 1987. Germination and seedling development of hogpotato (Hoffmanseggia densiflora). Weed Sci. 35:360–363.Google Scholar
9. Kummer, A. P. 1951. Pages 220–221 in Weed Seedlings. The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
10. Mann, R. K., Rieck, C. E., and Witt, W. W. 1981. Germination and emergence of burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus). Weed Sci. 29:83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Michel, B. E. 1983. Evaluation of the water potentials of solutions of polyethylene glycol 8000 both in the absence and presence of other solutes. Plant Physiol. 72:66–70.Google Scholar
12. Moore, R. J. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. 13. Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:1033–1048.Google Scholar
13. Rogers, C. B. and Oliver, L. R. 1982. A vegetative key for identification of morningglory species in the vegetative stage. Arkansas Farm Res. 31:4.Google Scholar
14. Scott, S. J., Jones, R. A., and Williams, W. A. 1984. Review of data analysis methods for seed germination. Crop Sci. 24:1192–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Southern Weed Science Society, Weed Identification Committee. Weed Identification Guide. Page 4 IPOPA. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Publ.Google Scholar
16. Stevens, O. A. 1945. Cultivation of milkweed. North Dakota Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 333.Google Scholar
17. Stoller, E. W. and Wax, L. M. 1974. Dormancy changes and fate of some annual weed seeds in the soil. Weed Sci. 22:151–155.Google Scholar
18. Stoller, E. W. and Sweet, R. D. 1987. Biology and life cycle of purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 1:66–73.Google Scholar
19. Tesar, M. B. 1984. Pages 108–112 in Physiological Basis of Crop Growth and Development. Am. Soc. Agron., Inc. and Crop Sci. Soc. Am., Inc., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
20. Wax, L. M., Fawcett, R. S., and Isley, D. 1981. Page 143 in Weeds of the North Central States. North Cent. Regional Res. Publ. No. 281.Google Scholar
21. Weed Loss Committee, Jordan, T. N. chairman. 1985. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 42:344–355.Google Scholar
22. Wilson, R. G. 1979. Germination and seedling development of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 27:146–151.Google Scholar