Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:23:50.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth and Competition of Black Nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) with Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Paul E. Keeley
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Shafter, CA 93263
Robert J. Thullen
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Shafter, CA 93263

Abstract

Black nightshade plants were controlled by hoeing in the same cotton plots each year (1982 to 1986) for 3 to 15 weeks after crop emergence to evaluate the influence of several black nightshade-free periods on cotton yield, reproduction of black nightshade, and longevity of weed seeds in soil. Similar information, although limited, was also collected for Palmer amaranth that escaped the initial herbicidal treatment each year. Except for 1982, black nightshade competing with cotton for the duration of the growing season in nonhoed plots severely reduced yields (60 to 100%), with greatest yield reductions (82 to 100%) occurring in 1983 and 1984 when 0.5 to 0.7 cm of rain fell within 10 days after cotton planting. When combined with cultivation, a 3-week nightshade-free period at cotton planting was of sufficient duration to protect cotton yields. Weed seed production for all hoed treatments was less than 1% of the nonhoed treatment, and after five consecutive cotton crops (1982 to 1986), the amount of both black nightshade and Palmer amaranth seeds in soil was similar for all hoed treatments. These populations were 60 to 80% and 95 to 97% less than beginning populations of black nightshade and Palmer amaranth in 1982, respectively. After 5 yr of continuous treatments, cotton was grown in 1987, with standard cultivation as the only method of weed control, to evaluate how the weed-free periods in 1982 to 1986 influenced weed seed populations in the soil and the resultant effect on weed competition and cotton yields. Reduction of cotton yields in 1987, in the absence of weed-free periods, indicated that black nightshade seed survival in soil appears to be sufficiently long for ample establishment of this weed to compete with cotton. Thus, fields will have to be kept weed free for greater than 5 yr to reduce black nightshade populations to a level that will not reduce cotton yields.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aldrich, R. A. 1987. Predicting crop yield reductions from weeds. Weed Tech. 1:199206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Brar, H. S. and Gill, H. S. 1983. Studies on the critical period of crop weed competition in cotton Gossypium hirsutum . Indian J. Ecol. 10:248254.Google Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. II. Cocklebur and redroot pigweed. Weed Sci. 19:580582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Burnside, O. C., Moomaw, R. S., Roeth, F. W., Wicks, G. A., and Wilson, R. G. Weed demise in soil in weed-free corn (Zea mays) production across Nebraska. Weed Sci. 34:248251.Google Scholar
5. Chancellor, R. J. 1979. The long-term effects of herbicides on weed populations. Ann. Appl. Biol. 91(1):141144.Google Scholar
6. Egley, G. H. and Chandler, J. M. 1978. Germination and viability of weed seeds after 2.5 years in a 50-year buried-seed study. Weed Sci. 26:230239.Google Scholar
7. Egley, G. H. and Chandler, J. M. 1983. Longevity of weed seeds after 5.5 years in the Stoneville 50-year buried-seed study. Weed Sci. 31:264270.Google Scholar
8. Fennimore, S. A., Mitich, L. W., and Radosevich, S. R. 1984. Interference among bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli), and black nightshade (Solanum nigrum). Weed Sci. 32:336342.Google Scholar
9. Holm, L. G., Plunchett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Pages 430435. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
10. Keeley, P. E., Miller, J. H., Kempen, H. M., and Hoover, M. 1975. Survey of weeds on cotton farms in the San Joaquin Valley. Proc. Calif. Weed Conf. 27:3947.Google Scholar
11. Keeley, P. E. and Thullen, R. J. 1983. Influence of planting date on the growth of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum). Weed Sci. 31:180184.Google Scholar
12. Keeley, P. E., Carter, C. H., and Thullen, R. J. 1987. Influence of planting date on growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Sci. 35:199204.Google Scholar
13. Kempen, H. M. and Woods, J. 1979. Pernicious weeds in western cotton: nightshades. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf.—Cotton Weed Sci. Res. Conf. 3:142143.Google Scholar
14. Kempen, H. M. 1982. Competition devastates cotton crop. California-Arizona Farm Press 4(3):2636.Google Scholar
15. Khedir, K. D. and Roeth, F. W. 1981. Velvetleaf (Albutilon theophrasti) seed populations in six continuous-corn (Zea mays) fields. Weed Sci. 29:485490.Google Scholar
16. Leguizamon, E. S. 1986. Seed survival and patterns of seedling emergence in Sorghum halepense (L.) Perspect. Weed Res. 26: 397403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Lueschen, W. E. and Andersen, R. M. 1980. Longevity of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seeds in soil under agricultural practices. Weed Sci. 28:341346.Google Scholar
18. Majek, A. 1981. Nightshade identification and control. Weeds Today. 12(2): 56.Google Scholar
19. Malone, C. R. 1967. A rapid method for enumeration of viable seeds in soil. Weed Sci. 15:381382.Google Scholar
20. Moss, S. R. 1980. A study of populations of blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides) in winter wheat, as influenced by seed shed in the previous crops, cultivation system and straw disposal method. Ann. Appl. Biol. 94:121126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Norris, R. F. 1984. Weed thresholds in relation to long-term population dynamics. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 37:3843.Google Scholar
22. Ogg, A. G. Jr., Rogers, B. S., and Schilling, E. E. 1981. Characterization of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States. Weed Sci. 29:2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Ogg, A. G. and Dawson, J. H. 1984. Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci. 32:327335.Google Scholar
24. Quakenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1984. Effect of soybean (Glycine max) interference on eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum). Weed Sci. 32:638645.Google Scholar
25. Radosevich, S. R. and Holt, J. S. 1984. Weed Ecology—Implications for Vegetation Management. Pages 942; 43–91; 93–135. A Wiley-Interscience Publication. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
26. Radosevich, S. R. 1987. Methods to study interactions among crops and weeds. Weed Tech. 1:190198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Roberts, H. A. 1962. Studies on the weeds of vegetable crops. II. Effect of six years of cropping on the weed seeds in the soil. J. Ecol. 50:803813.Google Scholar
28. Roberts, H. A. 1964. Studies on the weeds of vegetable crops. III. Effect of different primary cultivations on the weed seeds in the soil. J. Ecol. 51:8395.Google Scholar
29. Roberts, H. A. 1964. Emergence and longevity in cultivated soil of seeds of some annual weeds. Weed Res. 4:296307.Google Scholar
30. Roberts, H. A. and Stokes, F. G. 1965. Studies on the weeds of vegetable crops. V. Final observations on an experiment with different primary cultivations. J. Appl. Ecol. 2:307315.Google Scholar
31. Roberts, H. A. and Dawkins, P. A. 1967. Effect of cultivation on the numbers of viable weed seeds in soil. Weed Res. 7:290301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Roberts, H. A. 1968. The changing population of viable weed seeds in an arable soil. Weed Res. 8:253256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Roberts, H. A. and Lockett, P. M. 1978. Seed dormancy and field emergence in Solanum nigrum L. Weed Res. 18:231241.Google Scholar
34. Roberts, H. A. and Ricketts, M. E. 1979. Quantitative relationships between the weed flora after cultivation and the seed population in the soil. Weed Res. 19:269275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Roberts, H. A. and Potter, M. E. 1980. Emergence patterns of weed seedlings in relation to cultivation and rainfall. Weed Res. 20:377386.Google Scholar
36. Roberts, H. A. and Neilson, J. E. 1981. Changes in the soil seed bank of four long-term crop/herbicide experiments. J. Appl. Ecol. 18:661668.Google Scholar
37. Rogers, B. S. and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1981. Biology of weeds of the Solanum nigrum complex (Solanum section solanum) in North America. U.S. Dep. Agric., Sci. Ed., Agric. Admin. Reviews and Manuals, ARM-W-23/May 1981. 30 pp.Google Scholar
38. Schweizer, E. E. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1984. Weed seed decline in irrigated soil after six years of continuous corn (Zea mays) and herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:7683.Google Scholar
39. Schweizer, E. E. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1984. Weed seed decline in irrigated soil after rotation of crops and herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:8489.Google Scholar
40. Schweizer, E. E. 1985. Weed seed changes in irrigated soil after six years of continuous corn and atrazine. Weeds Today 16(2): 67.Google Scholar
41. Singh, M. 1970. Studies on seed germination of two varieties (black berried and red berried) of Solanum nigrum L. Trop. Ecol. 11:194200.Google Scholar
42. Taylorson, R. B. 1983. Aspects of seed biology and physiology in Weed Science. Weeds Today 14(2): 34.Google Scholar
43. Thullen, R. J. and Keeley, P. E. 1982. The effects of some environmental conditions of the germination of black nightshade and ivyleaf morningglory. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 35:7682.Google Scholar
44. Thurston, J. M. 1966. Survival of seeds of wild oats (Avena fatua L. and Avena ludovicana Dur.) and charlock (Sinapis arvensis L.) in soil under leys. Weed Res. 6:6780.Google Scholar
45. Wilson, B. J. 1981. The influence of reduced cultivations and direct drilling on the long term decline of a population of Avena fatua L. in spring barley. Weed Res. 21:2328.Google Scholar
46. Yadav, A. S. and Tripathi, R. S. 1982. A study on seed population dynamics of three weed species of Eupatorium . Weed Res. 22:6976.Google Scholar