Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T13:40:23.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Importance of Root, Shoot, and Seed Exposure on the Herbicidal Activity of EPTC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Reed A. Gray
Affiliation:
Stauffer Chemical Company, Agricultural Research Center, Mountain View, California
Andre J. Weierich
Affiliation:
Stauffer Chemical Company, Agricultural Research Center, Mountain View, California

Abstract

A charcoal barrier method was devised to prevent the movement of S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate (EPTC) in the soil in order to expose certain parts of the plant without exposing the rest of the plant. Exposing the roots of barley (Hordeum vulgare L., var. Blue Mariot), oats (Avena sativa L., var. California Red), barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crusgalli L. Beauv.), annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.), wheat (Triticum vulgare L.), rice (Oryza sativa L., var. Belle Patna), cotton (Gossypium peruvianum Cav.), and yellow nutgrass (Cyperus esculentus L.) caused more injury than shoot exposure, while shoot exposure caused slightly more injury than root exposure to Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense Pers.), sorghum (Sorghum vulgare Pers., hybrid Amak R-10), and peas (Pisum sativum L.). Seed exposure caused severe injury in some plant species but not others. The results obtained by this method disagree with published reports which claimed that only shoot exposure to EPTC led to injury. In numerous experiments with barley seeds accurately planted in a vertical position in a ½-inch layer of charcoal between two 1-inch layers of soil, root exposure always injured the plants more than shoot exposure. Exposing all parts (seeds, roots, and shoots) to EPTC caused the most injury to barley followed by exposing only the seeds, a combination of roots and shoots, roots, and shoots in decreasing order of injury symptoms. Similar results were obtained with oats when the depth of the treated soil above or below the seed was 1 inch, but increasing this depth to 1.5 inches or more resulted in more injury by shoot exposure than root exposure. The importance of root exposure was confirmed using another method of testing in which only the roots were exposed to the herbicide in nutrient solutions. Concentrations as low as 1 ppm of EPTC applied to the roots in nutrient solutions inhibited shoot growth of oats, barley, sorghum, and corn, while the growth of the roots was enhanced in some cases.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Appleby, A. P., Furtick, W. R., and Fang, S. C. 1965. Soil placement studies with EPTC and other carbamate herbicides on Avena sativa . Weed Res. 5:115122.Google Scholar
2. Dawson, J. H. 1963. Development of barnyardgrass seedlings and their response to EPTC. Weeds 11:6067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Eshel, Y. and Prendeville, G. N. 1967. A technique for studying root vs shoot uptake of soil-applied herbicides. Weed Res. 7:242245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Gray, R. A. and Weierich, A. J. 1965. Factors affecting the vapor loss of EPTC from soils. Weeds 13:141147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Knake, E. L., Appleby, A. P., and Furtick, W. R. 1967. Soil incorporation and site of uptake of preemergence herbicides. Weeds 15:228232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Parker, C. 1966. The importance of shoot entry in the action of herbicides applied to the soil. Weeds 14:117121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Prendeville, G. N., Eshel, Y., Schreiber, M. M., and Warren, G. F. 1967. Site of uptake of soil-applied herbicides. Weed Res. 7:316322.Google Scholar