Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T15:49:48.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) Density on Yield Loss of Barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E. Ann de St. Remy ,
John T. O'Donovan ,
Alan K. W. Tong ,
P. Ashley O'Sullivan ,
M. Paul Sharma  and
Don A. Dew
E. Ann de St. Remy
Affiliation:
Agric. Can., Res. Stn., Lacombe, Alberta TOC 1SO, Canada
John T. O'Donovan
Affiliation:
Alberta Environ. Ctr., Vegreville, Alberta TOB 4LO, Canada
Alan K. W. Tong
Affiliation:
Agric. Can., Res. Stn., Lacombe, Alberta TOC 1SO, Canada
P. Ashley O'Sullivan
Affiliation:
Agric. Can., Res. Stn., Lacombe, Alberta TOC 1SO, Canada
M. Paul Sharma
Affiliation:
Alberta Environ. Ctr., Vegreville, Alberta TOB 4LO, Canada
Don A. Dew
Affiliation:
Agric. Can., Res. Stn., Lacombe, Alberta TOC 1SO, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn. ♯ FAGTA) plant density (x) and percent yield loss (ŷ) was expressed by the following linear regression equations for barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), respectively; ŷ = 0.63 + 2.75 √x and ŷ = 5.04 + 3.05 √x. Tartary buckwheat causes serious yield reduction in barley and wheat. A Tartary buckwheat density at 30 plants/m2 at emergence reduced barley yield by 16% and wheat yield by 22%.

Keywords

Yield loss equationsweed interferenceFAGTA
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , July 1985 , pp. 521 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Dew, D. A. 1972. An index of competition for estimating crop loss due to weeds. Can. J. Plant Sci. 52:921–927.Google Scholar
2. Dew, D. A. and Keys, C. H. 1976. An index of competition for estimating loss of rape due to wild oats. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:1005–1006.Google Scholar
3. Frankton, C. and Mulligan, G. A. 1970. Publ. 948. Weeds of Canada. Can. Dep. Agric. 217 pp.Google Scholar
4. Hamman, W. M. 1979. Field confirmation of an index for predicting yield loss of wheat and barley due to wild oat competition. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59:243–244.Google Scholar
5. Nicholson, J.W.G., McQueen, R., Grant, E. A., and Burgess, P. L. 1976. The feeding value of Tartary buckwheat for ruminants. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 56:803–808.Google Scholar
6. O'Sullivan, P. A., Kossatz, V. C., Weiss, G. M., and Dew, D. A. 1982. An approach to estimating yield loss of barley due to Canada thistle. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:725–731.Google Scholar
7. Pavlychenko, T. K. and Harrington, J. B. 1934. Competitive efficiency of weeds and cereal crops. Can. J. Res. 10:77–94.Google Scholar
8. Vanden Born, W. H. and Corns, W. G. 1959. Studies on seed dormancy, plant development, and chemical control of Tartary buckwheat [Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn.] III. Chemical control and effects of competition. Can. J. Plant Sci. 39:63–70.Google Scholar
9. Vlasenko, A. N. 1979. The noxiousness of Tartarian buckwheat in wheat crops with shallow cultivation in N. Kulunda. Sibirskii Vestnik Sel'skokhozyaistvennoi Nauki. 5:27–30.Google Scholar