Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T15:37:50.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Temperature and Relative Humidity on the Activity of Acifluorfen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ronald L. Ritter  and
Harold D. Coble
Ronald L. Ritter
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Harold D. Coble
Affiliation:
Crop Science Dep., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27650
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influence of temperature and relative humidity on the activity of acifluorfen {5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid} on common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr.) and common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) was studied in growth chambers. Treatment at high relative humidity (85 ± 5%) resulted in a significant increase in acifluorfen phytotoxicity and decrease in plant dry weight as compared to treatment at a lower (50 ± 5%) relative humidity (RH). Temperature (32 C day, 22 C night or 26 C day, 16 C night) was not as critical as relative humidity in influencing acifluorfen phytotoxicity. Addition of a non-ionic surfactant to the herbicide solution resulted in increased phytotoxicity. Penetration and translocation of acifluorfen in common cocklebur were increased when applications were made at high relative humidity.

Keywords

Penetrationtranslocationdiphenylether herbicide

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , July 1981 , pp. 480 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Hammerton, J. L. 1967. Environmental factors and susceptibility to herbicides. Weeds 15:330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Hanson, C. L. and Rieck, C. E. 1977. Cocklebur control systems in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:47.Google Scholar
3. Hartnett, J. P. 1978. RH-5201 – A new postemergence soybean herbicide. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:28–29.Google Scholar
4. Johnson, W. O., Kollman, G. T., Swithenbank, C., and Yih, R. Y. 1978. RH-6201 (Blazer): A new broad spectrum herbicide for postemergence use in soybeans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 26:285–286.Google Scholar
5. Jordan, T. N. 1977. Effects of temperature and relative humidity on the toxicity of glyphosate to bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon . Weed Sci. 25:448–451.Google Scholar
6. Mangeot, B. L., Rieck, C. E., and Downs, J. P. 1977. Weed control in soybeans with RH-6201. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:50.Google Scholar
7. Mathis, W. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1977. Control of six morningglory species in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:38.Google Scholar
8. Muzik, T. J. and Mauldin, W. G. 1964. Influence of environment on the response of plants to herbicides. Weeds 12:142–145.Google Scholar
9. Nalewaja, J. D., Pudelko, J., and Adamczewski, K. A. 1975. Influence of climate and additives on bentazon. Weed Sci. 23:504–507.Google Scholar
10. Prasad, R., Foy, C. L., and Crafts, A. S. 1967. Effects of relative humidity on absorption and translocation of foliarly applied dalapon. Weeds 15:149–156.Google Scholar
11. Ritter, R. L. and Coble, H. D. 1979. Environmental factors which influence the performance of acifluorfen. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 32:63.Google Scholar
12. Ritter, R. L. and Coble, H. D. 1981. Penetration, translocation, and metabolism of acifluorfen in soybean (Glycine max), common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum . Weed Sci. 29:474–480.Google Scholar
13. Weber, J. B. 1977. Soil properties, herbicide sorption, and model soil systems. Pages 59–72 in Truelove, B., ed., South. Weed Sci. Soc., Auburn, Alabama.Google Scholar