Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T09:55:33.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Weed Competition on Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gale A. Buchanan  and
Earl R. Burns
Gale A. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, Alabama
Earl R. Burns
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, Alabama
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) grown at two locations in Alabama from 1966 to 1968 produced maximum yields when kept free of annual weeds for approximately 8 weeks after emergence. Weed control for longer periods failed to increase yields. When initial weed control measures were delayed until 6 to 7 weeks after emergence at one location and 4 to 5 weeks at the other location, cotton was not injured. Prolonged weed competition past the critical periods usually resulted in drastic cotton yield reductions. Plant height and stem diameter of cotton were reduced by some of the weed competition treatments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 1970 , pp. 149 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Burnside, O. C. and Wicks, G. A. 1965. Effect of herbicides and cultivation treatments on yield components of dryland sorghum in Nebraska. Agron. J. 57:21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Burnside, O. C. and Wicks, G. A. 1967. The effect of weed removal treatments on sorghum growth. Weeds 15:204–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Dawson, J. H. 1964. Competition between irrigated field beans and annual weeds. Weeds 12:206–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dawson, J. H. 1965. Competition between irrigated sugar beets and annual weeds. Weeds 13:245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Garner, Thomas H., Bowen, Henry D., Luscombe, James A., 1958. Effect of weed control on quality of mechanically-harvested cotton. Cotton Gin and Oil Mill Press 59:30–32.Google Scholar
6. Hill, L. V. and Santelmann, P. W. 1969. Competitive effects of annual weeds on Spanish peanuts. Weed Sci. 17:1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1965. Giant foxtail seeded at various times in corn and soybeans. Weeds 13:331–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Nieto, Jorge H. and Staniforth, D. W. 1961. Corn-foxtail competition under various production conditions. Agron. J. 53:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Staniforth, David W. 1958. Soybean-foxtail competition under varying soil moisture conditions. Agron. J. 50:13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Staniforth, David W. 1961. Responses of corn hybrids to yellow foxtail competition. Weeds 9:132–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Staniforth, David W. 1962. Responses of soybean varieties to weed competition. Agron. J. 54:11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Staniforth, David W. 1965. Competitive effects of three foxtail species on soybeans. Weeds 13:191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Wax, L. M. and Pendleton, J. W. 1968. Effect of row spacing on weed control in soybeans. Weed Sci. 16:462–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Wiese, A. F., Collier, J. F., Clark, L. E., and Havelka, U. D. 1964. Effects of weeds and cultural practices on sorghum yields. Weeds 12:209–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Zimdahl, Robert L. and Fertig, Stanford N. 1967. Influence of weed competition on sugar beets. Weeds 15:336–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar