Skip to main content

Interference of Redstem Filaree (Erodium cicutarium) in Sugarbeet

  • Dennis C. Odero (a1), Abdel O. Mesbah (a2), Stephen D. Miller (a3) and Andrew R. Kniss (a3)

Redstem filaree is a troublesome weed for sugarbeet growers in northern Wyoming and southern Montana. Field studies were conducted in Powell, WY, in 2006 and 2008 to determine the influence of season-long interference of various redstem filaree densities and the duration of interference on sugarbeet. Root and sucrose yield decreased with increasing redstem filaree density. The rectangular hyperbola model with the asymptote (A) bounded at 100% maximum yield reduction characterized the relationship between redstem filaree density and sugarbeet yield reduction. The estimated parameter I (percent yield reduction per unit weed density as density approaches zero) was 5% for root and sucrose yield reduction. Sugarbeet root yield decreased as the duration of redstem filaree interference increased. The critical timing of redstem filaree removal to avoid 5 and 10% root yield reduction was estimated to be 25 and 32 d after sugarbeet emergence, respectively. Redstem filaree interference did not affect the sucrose content percentage. These results demonstrate that redstem filaree is competitive with sugarbeet and should be managed appropriately to reduce negative effects on yield.

Corresponding author
Corresponding author's E-mail:
Hide All
Al-Wahaibi, A. K. and Walker, G. P. 2000. Searching and oviposition behavior of a mymarid egg parasitoid, Anagrus nigriventris on five host plant species of its leafhopper host, Circulifer tenellus . Entomol. Exp. Appl. 96:925.
Blackshaw, R. E. 1992. Soil temperature, soil moisture, seed burial depths effects on redstem filaree (Erodium cicutarium). Weed Sci. 40:204207.
Blackshaw, R. E. and Harker, K. N. 1988. Erodium cicutarium density and duration of interference effects on yield of wheat, oilseed rape, pea and dry bean. Weed Res. 38:5562.
Blackshaw, R. E. and Harker, K. N. 1998. Redstem filaree (Erodium cicutarium) development and productivity under noncompetitive conditions. Weed Technol. 4:590594.
Bukun, B. 2004. The critical period for weed control in cotton in Turkey. Weed Sci. 44:404412.
Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239252.
Harker, K. N., Blackshaw, R. E. and Clayton, G. W. 2007. Wild oat (Avena fatua) vs. redstem filaree (Erodium cicutarium) interference in dry pea. Weed Technol. 21:235240.
Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. New York Academic Press. 892 p.
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., Van Acker, R. C., and Lindquist, J. L. 2002. Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci. 50:773786.
McIntosh, M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75:153155.
Mesbah, A., Miller, S. D., Fornstrom, K. J., and Legg, D. E. 1994. Kochia (Kochia scoparia) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Technol. 8:754759.
Mesbah, A., Miller, S. D., Fornstrom, K. J., and Legg, D. E. 1995. Wild mustard (Brassica kaber) and wild oat (Avena fatua) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris L.). Weed Technol. 9:4952.
Mesbah, A. O., Miller, S. D., and Stevens, W. B. 2004. Redstem filaree control in sugarbeets with micro-rate herbicide treatments. Crop Manage. DOI:10.1094/CM-2004-0826-01-RS. Available at Accessed: March 29, 2010.
Milford, G. F. J. 1973. The growth and development of the storage root of sugar beet. Ann. Appl. Biol. 75:427438.
Norsworthy, J. K. and Oliveira, M. J. 2004. Comparison of the critical period for weed control in wide- and narrow-row corn. Weed Sci. 52:802807.
Odero, D. C., Mesbah, A. O., Miller, S. D., and Kniss, A. R. 2009. Venice mallow (Hibiscus trionum) interference in sugarbeet. Weed Technol. 23:581585.
Odero, D. C., Mesbah, A. O., Miller, S. D., and Kniss, A. R. 2010a. Wild buckwheat (Polygonum convolvulus) interference in sugarbeet. Weed Technol. 24:5963.
Odero, D. C., Mesbah, A. O., Miller, S. D., and Kniss, A. R. 2010b. Lanceleaf sage (Salvia reflexa) interference in sugarbeet. Weed Technol. 24:557561.
Paolini, R., Principi, M., Froud-Williams, R. J., Del Puglia, S., and Biancardi, E. 1999. Competition between sugarbeet and Sinapis arvensis and Chenopodium album, as affected by timing of nitrogen fertilization. Weed Res. 39:425440.
Park, S. E., Benjamin, L. R., and Watkinson, A. R. 2003. The theory and application of plant competition models: an agronomic perspective. Ann. Bot. 92:741748.
Ritz, C. and Spiess, A. N. 2008. qpcR: an R package for sigmoidal model selection in quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. Bioinformatics. 24:15491551.
Ritz, C. and Streibig, J. C. 2005. Bioassay analysis using R. J. Statist. Software. 12:122.
Seber, G. A. F. and Wild, C. J. 1989. Nonlinear Regression. New York Wiley & Sons. 330 p.
Schweizer, E. E. 1981. Broadleaf weed interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 29:128133.
Schweizer, E. E. 1983. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 31:58.
Schweizer, E. E. and Bridge, L. D. 1982. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 30:514519.
Schweizer, E. E. and May, M. J. 1993. Weeds and weed control. Pages 485519 in Cooke, D. A., and Scott, R. K., eds. The Sugar Beet Crop: Science into Practice. London Chapman and Hall.
Schweizer, E. E. and Lauridson, T. C. 1985. Powell amaranth (Amaranthus powellii) interference in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 33:518520.
Scott, R. K. and Wilcockson, S. J. 1976. Weed biology and the growth of sugar beet. Ann. Appl. Biol. 83:331335.
Weatherspoon, D. M. and Schweizer, E. E. 1969. Competition between kochia and sugarbeets. Weed Sci. 17:464467.
Whitson, T. D., Burrill, L. C., Dewey, S. A., Cudney, D. W., Nelson, B. E., Lee, R. D., and Parker, R. 2002. Weeds of the West. Laramie, WY Western Soc. Weed Sci. & Univ. Wyoming Coop. Ext. Serv. Pp. 350351.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Science
  • ISSN: 0043-1745
  • EISSN: 1550-2759
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed