Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T20:54:21.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Invertebrate Seed Predators Reduce Weed Emergence Following SeedRain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Carmen K. Blubaugh  and
Ian Kaplan
Carmen K. Blubaugh*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Purdue University, 901 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Ian Kaplan
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Purdue University, 901 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: carmen.blubaugh@wsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weeds are selected to produce overwhelming propagule pressure, and whilevertebrate and invertebrate seed predators destroy a large percentage ofseeds, their ecosystem services may not be sufficient to overcomegermination site limitations. Cover crops are suggested to facilitate seedpredation, but it is difficult to disentangle reductions in weed recruitmentattributable to granivores from those due to plant competition. Using commonlambsquarters as a focal weed species, we used experimental seed subsidiesand differential seed predator exclusion to evaluate the utility ofvertebrate and invertebrate seed predators in fallow, killed cover crop, andliving mulch systems. Over two growing seasons, we found that seed predatorswere responsible for a 38% reduction in seedling emergence and 81% reductionin weed biomass in fallow plots following simulated seed rain, suggestingthat granivory indeed overcomes safe-site limitation and suppresses weeds.However, the common lambsquarters densities in ambient seedbanks acrossfallow and cover crop treatments were high, and seed predators did notimpact their abundance. Across the study, we found either neutral ornegative effects of vertebrate seed predators on seed predation, suggestingthat invertebrate seed predators contribute most to common lamnsquartersregulation in our system. These results imply that weed seed biocontrol byinvertebrates can reduce propagule pressure initially following senescence,but other tools must be leveraged for long-term seedbank management.

Keywords

Common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEALChenopodium albumcover cropsseed limitationweed seed predation

Information

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 80 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Current address: Washington State University Department of Entomology, Pullman, WA 99164.

Associate Editor for this paper: Adam Davis, USDA-ARS

References

Literature Cited

Baraibar, B, Westerman, PR, Carrión, E, Recasens, J (2009) Effects of tillage and irrigation in cereal fields on weed seed removal by seed predators. J Appl Ecol 46: 380–387 Google Scholar
Blubaugh, CK, Kaplan, I (2015) Tillage compromises weed seed predator activity across developmental stages. Biol Control 81:76–82 Google Scholar
Bohan, D, Boursault, A, Brooks, DR, Petit, S (2011) National-scale regulation of the weed seedbank by carabid predators. J Appl Ecol 48:888–898 Google Scholar
Boyd, N, Van Acker, R (2004) Seed and microsite limitations to emergence of four annual weed species. Weed Sci 52:571–577 Google Scholar
Brust, GE (1994) Seed-predators reduce broadleaf weed growth and competitive ability. Agr Ecosyst Environ 48:27–34 Google Scholar
Brust, GE, House, GJ (1988) Weed seed destruction by arthropods and rodents in low-input soybean agroecosystems. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 3:19–25 Google Scholar
Calviño-Cancela, M. (2007) Seed and microsite limitations of recruitment and the impacts of post-dispersal seed predation at the within population level. Plant Ecol 192:35–44 Google Scholar
Carmona, DM, Landis, DA (1999) Influence of refuge habitats and cover crops on seasonal activity-density of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in field crops. Environ Entomol 28:1145–1153 Google Scholar
Clements, DR, Benott, DL, Murphy, SD, Swanton, CJ (1996) Tillage effects on weed seed return and seedbank composition. Weed Sci 44:314–322 Google Scholar
Crawley, MJ (2000) Seed predators and plant population dynamics. in Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. Fenner, M, ed. Wallingford, UK CABI Publishing Google Scholar
Davis, AS, Liebman, ML (2003) Cropping system effects on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) demography: I. Green manure and tillage timing. Weed Sci 51:919–929 Google Scholar
Davis, AS (2006) When does it make sense to target the weed seed bank? Weed Sci 54:558–565 Google Scholar
Davis, AS, Schutte, BJ, Iannuzzi, J, Renner, KA (2008) Chemical and physical defense of weed seeds in relation to soil seedbank persistence. Weed Sci 56:676–684 Google Scholar
Davis, AS, Raghu, S (2010) Weighing abiotic and biotic influences on seed predation. Weed Res 50:402–412 Google Scholar
Davis, AS, Hill, JD, Chase, CA, Johanns, AM, Liebman, M (2012) Increasing cropping system diversity balances productivity, profitability and environmental health. PloS ONE. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047149Google Scholar
Diehl, E, Wolters, V, Birkhofer, K (2012) Arable weeds in organically managed wheat fields foster carabid beetles by resource-and structure-mediated effects. Arthropod Plant Interact 6:75–82 Google Scholar
Fox, AF, Reberg-Horton, SC, Orr, DB, Moorman, CE, Frank, SD (2013) Crop and field border effects on weed seed predation in the southeastern US coastal plain. Agr Ecosyst Environ 177:58–62 Google Scholar
Gallandt, ER, Molloy, T, Lynch, RP, Drummond, FA (2005) Effect of cover-cropping systems on invertebrate seed predation. Weed Sci 53:69–76 Google Scholar
Gallandt, ER (2006) How can we target the weed seedbank? Weed Sci 54:588–596 Google Scholar
Harrison, S, Gallandt, ER (2012) Behavioural studies of Harpalus rufipes De Geer: an important weed seed predator in northeastern US agroecosystems. Int J Ecol. DOI: 10.1155/2012/846546Google Scholar
Heard, MS, Hawes, C, Champion, GT, Clark, SJ, Firbank, LG, Haughton, AJ, Hill, MO (2003) Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide–tolerant crops. I. Effects on abundance and diversity. Philos T Roy Soc B 58:1819–1832 Google Scholar
Heggenstaller, AH, Menalled, FD, Liebman, M, Westerman, PR (2006) Seasonal patterns in post-dispersal seed predation of Abutilon theophrasti and Setaria faberi in three-cropping systems. J Appl Ecol 43:999–1010 Google Scholar
Holm, LG, Plucknett, DL, Pancho, JV, Herberger, JP (1977) The World's Worst Weeds. Honolulu, HI Hawaii University Press Google Scholar
Holmes, RJ, Froud-Williams, RJ (2005). Post-dispersal weed seed predation by avian and non-avian predators. Agr Ecosyst Environ 105:23–27 Google Scholar
Landis, DA, Wratten, SD, Gurr, GM (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests of agriculture. Ann Rev Entomol 45:175–201 Google Scholar
Landis, DA, Menalled, FD, Costamagna, AC, Wilkinson, TK (2005) Manipulating plant resources to enhance beneficial arthropods in agricultural landscapes. Weed Sci 53:902–908 Google Scholar
Liebman, M, Gallandt, ER (1997) Many little hammers: ecological management of crop-weed interactions. Pages 291–343 in Jackson, LE, ed. Ecology in Agriculture. San Diego, CA Academic Press Google Scholar
Lundgren, JG, Rosentrater, KA (2007) The strength of seeds and their destruction by granivorous insects. Arthropod Plant Interact 1:93–99 Google Scholar
Lundgren, JG (2009). Relationships of Natural Enemies and Non-prey Foods. Dordrecht, The Netherlands Springer International Google Scholar
Marino, PC, Gross, K L, Landis, DA (1997) Weed seed loss due to predation in Michigan maize fields. Agr Ecosyst Environ 66:189–196 Google Scholar
Mauchline, AL, Watson, SJ, Brown, VK, Froud-Williams, RJ (2005) Post-dispersal seed predation of non-target weeds in arable crops. Weed Res 45:157–164 Google Scholar
Menalled, FD, Marino, PC, Renner, KA, Landis, DA (2000) Post-dispersal weed seed predation in Michigan crop fields as a function of agricultural landscape structure. Agr Ecosyst Environ 77:193–202 Google Scholar
Meiss, H, LeLagadec, L, Munier-Jolain, N, Waldhardt, R, Petit, S (2010) Weed seed predation increases with vegetation cover in perennial forage crops. Agr Ecosyst Environ 138:10–16 Google Scholar
Mohler, CL, Dykeman, C, Nelson, EB, Ditommaso, A (2012) Reduction in weed seedling emergence by pathogens following the incorporation of green crop residue. Weed Res 52:467–477 Google Scholar
Muñoz, A, Bonal, R (2008) Are you strong enough to carry that seed? Seed size/body size ratios influence seed choices by rodents. Animal Behav 76:709–715 Google Scholar
O'Rourke, ME, Heggenstaller, AH, Liebman, M, Rice, ME (2006) Post-dispersal weed seed predation by invertebrates in conventional and low-external-input crop rotation systems. Agr Ecosyst Environ 116:280–288 Google Scholar
Pullaro, TC, Marino, PC, Jackson, NM, Harrison, HF, Keinath, AP (2006) Effects of killed cover crop mulches on weeds, weed seeds, and herbivores. Agr Ecosyst Environ 115:97–104 Google Scholar
Reader, RJ (1993) Control of seedling emergence by ground cover and seed predation in relation to seed size for some old field species. J Ecol 81:169–175 Google Scholar
Shearin, AF, Reberg-Horton, CS, Gallandt, ER (2008) Cover crop effects on the activity-density of the weed seed predator Harpalus rufipes (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Weed Sci 56:442–450 Google Scholar
Turnbull, LA, Crawley, MJ, Rees, M (2000). Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. Oikos 88: 225–238 Google Scholar
Ward, MJ, Ryan, MR, Curran, WS, Barbercheck, ME, Mortensen, DA (2011) Cover crops and disturbance influence activity-density of weed seed predators Amara aenea and Harpalus pensylvanicus (Coleoptera:Carabidae). Weed Sci 59:76–81 Google Scholar
Weaver, SE, Tan, CS, Brain, P (1988) Effect of temperature and soil moisture on time of emergence of tomatoes and four weed species. Can J Plant Sci 68:877–886 Google Scholar
Westerman, PR, Borza, JK, Andjelkovic, J, Liebman, M, Danielson, BJ (2008) Density-dependent predation of weed seeds in maize fields. J Appl Ecol 45:1612–1620 Google Scholar
Westerman, PR, Liebman, M, Heggenstaller, AH, Forcella, F. 2006. Integrating measurements of seed availability and removal to estimate weed seed losses due to predation. Weed Sci 54:566–574 Google Scholar
Westerman, PR, Hofman, A, Vet, L, VanDerWerf, W (2003) Relative importance of vertebrates and invertebrates in epigeaic weed seed predation in organic cereal fields. Agr Ecosyst Environ 95:417–425 Google Scholar
Whitaker, JO (1966) Food of Mus musculus, Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii and Peromyscus leucopus in Vigo County, Indiana. J Mammal 47:473–486 Google Scholar
Williams, C, Liebman, M, Westerman, PR, Borza, J, Sundberg, B, Danielson, BJ (2009) Over-winter predation of Abutilon theophrasti and Setaria faberi seeds in arable land. Weed Res 49:439–447 Google Scholar
White, SS, Renner, KA, Menalled, FD, Landis, DA (2007) Feeding preferences of weed seed predators and effect on weed emergence. Weed Sci 55:606–612 Google Scholar