Skip to main content
×
Home

A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of 2,4-D and Dicamba Drift on Soybean and Cotton

  • J. Franklin Egan (a1), Kathryn M. Barlow (a2) and David A. Mortensen (a2)
Abstract

Commercial introduction of cultivars of soybean and cotton genetically modified with resistance to the synthetic auxin herbicides dicamba and 2,4-D will allow these compounds to be used with greater flexibility but may expose susceptible soybean and cotton cultivars to nontarget herbicide drift. From past experience, it is well known that soybean and cotton are both highly sensitive to low-dose exposures of dicamba and 2,4-D. In this study, a meta-analysis approach was used to synthesize data from over seven decades of simulated drift experiments in which investigators treated soybean and cotton with low doses of dicamba and 2,4-D and measured the resulting yields. These data were used to produce global dose–response curves for each crop and herbicide, with crop yield plotted against herbicide dose. The meta-analysis showed that soybean is more susceptible to dicamba in the flowering stage and relatively tolerant to 2,4-D at all growth stages. Conversely, cotton is tolerant to dicamba but extremely sensitive to 2,4-D, especially in the vegetative and preflowering squaring stages. Both crops are highly variable in their responses to synthetic auxin herbicide exposure, with soil moisture and air temperature at the time of exposure identified as key factors. Visual injury symptoms, especially during vegetative stages, are not predictive of final yield loss. Global dose–response curves generated by this meta-analysis can inform guidelines for herbicide applications and provide producers and agricultural professionals with a benchmark of the mean and range of crop yield loss that can be expected from drift or other nontarget exposures to 2,4-D or dicamba.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author's E-mail: Franklin.Egan@ars.usda.gov
References
Hide All
[AAPCO] Association of American Pesticide Control Officials (2005) Pesticide Drift Enforcement Survey Report. Milford, DE: AAPCO. http://aapco.ceris.purdue.edu/doc/surveys/DriftEnforce05Rpt.htm. Accessed November 26, 2012.
Al-Khatib K, Peterson D (1999) Soybean (Glycine max) response to simulated drift from selected sulfonylurea herbicides, dicamba, glyphosate, and glufosinate. Weed Technol 13:264270
Andersen SM, Clay SA, Wrage LJ, Matthees D (2004) Soybean foliage residues of dicamba and 2,4-D and correlation to application rates and yield. Agron J. 96:750760
Arle HF (1954) The sensitivity of Acala 44 cotton to 2,4-D. Pages 2025 in Proceedings of the 14th Western Weed Control Conference. Tuscon, AZ Western Weed Science Society
Auch DE, Arnold WE, (1978) Dicamba use and injury on soybeans (Glycine max) in South Dakota. Weed Sci. 26:471475
Bagnardi V, Zambon A, Quatto P, Corrao G (2004) Flexible meta-regression functions for modeling aggregate dose-response data, with an application to alcohol and mortality. Am J Epidemiol 159:10771086
Banks PA, Schroeder J (2002) Carrier volume affects herbicide activity in simulated spray drift studies. Weed Technol 16:833837
Barker GL, Hatfield JL, Wanjura DF (1985) Cotton phenology parameters as affected by wind. Field Crops Res 12:3347
Bednarz CW, Nichols RL (2005) Phenological and morphological components of cotton crop maturity. Crop Sci. 45:14971503
Behrens R, Hall WC, Fisher CE (1955) Field responses of cotton to four phenoxy-type herbicides. Pages 7275 in Proceedings of the 8th Southern Weed Control Conference. St. Petersburg, FL Southern Weed Science Society
Behrens MR, Mutlu N, Chakraborty S, Dumitru R, Jiang WZ, LaVallee BJ, Herman PL, Clemente TE, Weeks DP (2007) Dicamba resistance: Enlarging and preserving biotechnology-based weed management strategies. Science 316:11851188
Behrens R, Lueschen WE (1979) Dicamba volatility. Weed Sci. 27:486493
Boerboom C (2004) Field case studies of dicamba movement to soybeans. Wisconsin Fertilizer, Aglime, and Pest Management conference, Madison, WI. 5 p
Brown RB, Carter MH, Stephenson GR (2004) Buffer zone and windbreak effects on spray drift deposition in a simulated wetland. Pest Manag Sci. 60:10851090
Burnham KP, Anderson DM (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. New York Springer-Verlag. 488 p
Carlsen SCK, Spliid NH, Svensmark B (2006) Drift of 10 herbicides after tractor spray application. 2. Primary drift (droplet drift). Chemosphere 64:778786
Carns H, Goodman VH (1956) Responses of cotton to 2,4-D Bulletin of the Mississippi Agricultural Experiment Station. 15 p
Cedergreen N, Ritz C, Streibig JC (2005) Improved empirical models describing hormesis. Environ Toxicol Chem. 24:31663172
Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (2012) CAB Direct Database. http://www.cabdirect.org. Accessed August–November 2011.
Charles GW, Constable GA, Llewellyn DJ, Hickman MA (2007) Tolerance of cotton expressing a 2,4-D detoxification gene to 2,4-D applied in the field. Aust. J. Agric. Res 58:780787
Constantin J, de Oliveira RS Júnior, Fagliari JR, Pagliari PH, de Arantes JGZ, Cavalieri SD, Framesqui VP, Gonçalves DA (2007) Effect of sub-lethal dosages of 2,4-D on cotton yield and crop susceptibility as a function of its development stage. Engenharia Agrícola 27:2429
Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC (2009) The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. 2nd ed. New York Russel Sage Foundation. 615 p
Crawley MJ (2005) Statistics: An Introduction Using R. West Sussex, UK John Wiley and Sons. Pages 3350
de Jong FMW, de Snoo GR, van de Zande JC (2008) Estimated nationwide effects of pesticide spray drift on terrestrial habitats in the Netherlands. J Environ Manage 86:721730
Dow AgroSciences (2011a) Research Demonstrating Reduction in Potential Off-Target Movement for 2,4-D Choline and Colex-D™ Technology as Part of the Enlist™ Weed Control System. Krieger M, editor. Supplemental Information for Petition for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Herbicide Tolerant DAS-68416-4 Soybean. Pages 13 p
Dow AgroSciences (2011b) Stewardship of Herbicide Tolerant Trait Technology for DAS-68416-4 Soybean. Krieger M, editor. Supplemental Information for Petition for Determination of Non-regulated Status for Herbicide Tolerant DAS-68416-4 Soybean. Pages 12 p
Egan JF, Mortensen DA (2012) Quantifying vapor drift of dicamba herbicides applied to soybean. Environ Toxicol Chem. 31:10231031
Ellis JM, Griffin JL, Jones CA (2002) Effect of carrier volume on corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) response to simulated drift of glyphosate and glufosinate. Weed Technol 16:587592
Epps EA (1953) Growth regulators. Effect of 2,4-D on growth and yield of cotton. J Agric Food Chem. 1:10091010
Everitt JD, Keeling JW (2009) Cotton growth and yield response to simulated 2,4-D and dicamba drift. Weed Technol 23:503506
Fox J, Weiseberg S (2010) An R Companion to Applied Regression. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications. 249 p
Goodman VH (1953) The yield and progeny seedling responses of cotton to treatment with 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, and MCPA. Pages 4756 in Proceedings of the 6th Southern Weed Control Conference. Knoxville, TN Southern Weed Science Society
Goodman VH, Ennis WB, Palmer RD (1955) Cotton responses to 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, MCPA and related growth regulators. Pages 7681 in Proceedings of the 8th Southern Weed Control Conference. St. Petersburg, FL Southern Weed Science Society
Grover R, Yoshida K, Maybank J (1972) Droplet and vapor drift from butyl ester and dimethylamine salt of 2,4-D. Weed Sci. 20:320324
Hamilton KC, Arle HF (1979) Response of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) to dicamba. Weed Sci. 27:604607
Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology. 80:11501156
Hill BD, Harker KN, Hasselback P, Moyer JR, Inaba DJ, Byers SD (2002) Phenoxy herbicides in Alberta rainfall: Potential effects on sensitive crops. Can J Plant Sci. 82:481484
Johnson VA, Fisher LR, Jordan DL, Edmisten KE, Stewart AM, York AC, (2012) Cotton, peanut, and soybean response to sublethal rates of dicamba, glufosinate, and 2,4-D. Weed Technol 26:195206
Kelley KB, Wax LM, Hager AG, Riechers DE (2005) Soybean response to plant growth regulator herbicides is affected by other postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 53:101112
Kittock DL, Arle HF (1977) Termination of late season cotton fruiting with plant growth regulators. Crop Sci. 17:320324
Kittock DL, Mauney JR, Arle HF, Bariola LA (1973) Termination of late season cotton fruiting with growth regulators as an insect-control technique. J Environ Qual 2:405408
Kuehl RO (2000) Design of experiments: statistical principles of research design and analysis. 2nd edition. Pacific Grove, CA Brooks and Cole. 666 p
Lanini WT (2000) Simulated drift of herbicides on grapes, tomatoes, cotton, and sunflower. Pages 107110 in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the California Weed Science Society. Fremont, CA California Weed Science Society
Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry. 2,4-D Herbicide Regulations. Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry Pesticide Rules and Regulations, Section 143. 24 p
Marple ME, Al-Khatib K, Peterson DE (2008) Cotton injury and yield as affected by simulated drift of 2,4-D and dicamba. Weed Technol 22:609614
Marple ME, Al-Khatib K, Shoup D, Peterson DE, Claassen M (2007) Cotton response to simulated drift of seven hormonal-type herbicides. Weed Technol 21:987992
Merotto A Jr., Vidal RA, Fleck NG (1999) Soybean tolerance to synthetic auxin and potential of mixtures with protox-inhibiting herbicides. Pages 319324 in Brighton Crop Protection Conference: Weeds. Brighton, UK British Crop Protection Council
Miller JH, Kempen HM, Wilkerson JA, Foy CL (1963) Response of cotton to 2,4-D and related phenoxy herbicides. United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 1289. 28 p
Monaco TJ, Weller SC, Ashton FM (2002) Weed Science: Principles and Practices. New York John Wiley and Sons. Pp 291310
Mortensen DA, Egan JF, Maxwell BD, Ryan MR, Smith RG (2012) Navigating a critical juncture for sustainable weed management. BioScience 62:7585
Oosterhuis DM, Jernstedt J (1999) Morphology and anatomy of the cotton plant. Pages 175206 in Smith CW Cothren JT, eds. Cotton: Origin, History, Technology, and Production. New York Wiley and Sons
Paul PA, Lipps PE, Madden LV (2006) Meta-analysis of regression coefficients for the relationship between fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol content of wheat. Phytopathology 96:951961
Pedersen P (2004) Soybean Growth and Development. Ames, IA Iowa State University Extension. 28 p
R Core Team (2011) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ISBN: 3-900051-07-0. Available online at http://www.R-project.org/
Rinella MJ, Sheley RL (2005) A model for predicting invasive weed and grass dynamics. II. Accuracy evaluation. Weed Sci. 53:605614
Ritz C, Streibig JC (2005) Bioassay analysis using R. J Stat Softw 12:122
Ritz C, Streibig JC (2008) Nonlinear Regression with R. New York Springer Science and Business Media. 148 p
Robinson AP, Davis VM, Simpson DM, Johnson WG (2013) Response of soybean yield components to 2,4-D. Weed Sci. 61:6876
Roider CA, Griffin JL, Harrison SA, Jones CA (2008) Carrier volume affects wheat response to simulated glyphosate drift. Weed Technol 22:453458
Schutte BJ, Hager AG, Davis AS (2010) Respray requests on custom-applied, glyphosate-resistant soybeans in Illinois: how many and why. Weed Technol 24:590598
Slife FW (1956) The effect of 2,4-D and several other herbicides on weeds and soybeans when applied as post-emergence sprays. Weeds 4:6168
Smith DT, Wiese AF (1972) Cotton Response to Low Rates of 2,4-D and Other Herbicides Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. B-1120. 8 p
Smith RJ (1965) Effects of chlorophenoxy herbicides on soybeans. Weeds 13:168169
Staten G (1946) Contamination of cotton fields by 2,4-D or hormone-type weed sprays. Agron J. 38:536544
Texas Department of Agriculture (2012) Regulated Herbicides and Regulated Herbicide Counties. http://www.texasagriculture.gov/RegulatoryPrograms/Pesticides/ RegulatedHerbicides/RegulatedHerbicidesCounties.aspx. Accessed November 20, 2012
Thomas WE, Staal M, Bowe S, Bozeman L (2012) Engenia herbicide: maximizing on-target spray deposition. Page 83 in ASA, CSSA, SSSA International Meetings. Cincinnati, OH ASA, CSSA, SSSA
Thompson SG, Higgins JPT (2002) How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Stat Med. 21:15591573
Tuduri L, Harner T, Blanchard P, Li YF, Poissant L, Waite DT, Murphy C, Belzer W (2006) A review of currently used pesticides (CUPS) in Canadian air and precipitation. Part 2: Regional information and perspectives. Atmos Environ. 40:15791589
[US EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency (2006) Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Dicamba and Associated Salts. Washington, DC US EPA. 165 p
Wagner NC, Maxwell BD, Taper ML, Rew LJ (2007) Developing an empirical yield-prediction model based on wheat and wild oat (Avena fatua) density, nitrogen and herbicide rate, and growing-season precipitation. Weed Sci. 55:652664
Waltz E (2010) Glyphosate resistance threatens Roundup hegemony. Nat Biotechnol 28:537538
Wang M, Rautman D (2008) A simple probabilistic estimation of spray drift -factors determining spray drift and development of a model. Environ Toxicol Chem. 27:26172626
Watson AJ (1955) The response of cotton to low rates of 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, MCP and Silvex. Pages 8286 in Proceedings of the 8th Southern Weed Control Conference. St. Petersburg, FL Southern Weed Science Society
Wax LM, Knuth LA, Slife FW (1969) Response of soybeans to 2,4-D, dicamba and picloram. Weed Sci. 17:388393
Weidenhamer JD, Triplett GB, Sobotka FE (1989) Dicamba injury to soybean. Agron J. 81:637643
Wiese AF, Martin AG (1963) Toxicity of benzoic acid herbicide to cotton and soybeans. Weeds 11:710
Wright TR, Shan GM, Walsh TA, Lira JM, Cui C, Song P, Zhuang MB, Arnold NL, Lin GF, Yau K, Russell SM, Cicchillo RM, Peterson MA, Simpson DM, Zhou N, Ponsamuel J, Zhang ZY (2010) Robust crop resistance to broadleaf and grass herbicides provided by aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase transgenes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:2024020245
Zar JH (2009) Biostatistical Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ Pearson. 960 p
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Science
  • ISSN: 0043-1745
  • EISSN: 1550-2759
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 33 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 281 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 21st November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.