Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T14:38:29.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metribuzin resistance in Amaranthus retroflexus and Chenopodium album in Greece

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ioannis B. Vasilakoglou
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agronomy, University of Thessaloniki, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
Kico V. Dhima
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agronomy, University of Thessaloniki, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece

Abstract

Greenhouse, field, and laboratory experiments were conducted in northern Greece during 1996, 1997, and 1998 to study possible metribuzin resistance in Amaranthus retroflexus (redroot pigweed) and Chenopodium album (common lambsquarters) biotypes found in potato fields. The greenhouse experiments indicated that the suspected resistant biotypes (R) of both species were not controlled by metribuzin applied either pre- or postemergence at rates of 245, 490, 980, and 1,960 g ai ha−1 (the higher rate is eight times greater than the rate recommended for weed control in Solanum tuberosum [potato]). However, susceptible biotypes (S) were completely controlled by 245 g ai ha−1. Also, both R- and S-biotypes of either species were effectively controlled by prometryn applied either pre- or postemergence at 1.5 kg ai ha−1. The field trials confirmed that metribuzin applied either pre- or postemergence at rates of 490, 980, and 1,960 g ai ha−1 gave fair or partial control of the R-biotype of C. album, whereas prometryn applied preemergence at 1.5 kg ai ha−1 gave excellent control of this weed. Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements performed in laboratory experiments indicated that photosynthetic electron transport in metribuzin-incubated leaves detached from plants of the R-biotypes was not affected, but it was inhibited in leaves detached from plants of the S-biotypes. Electron transport was inhibited by prometryn in leaves detached from both S- and R-biotypes of either species. These results show clearly that the biotypes of both species developed resistance to metribuzin, but they were not cross-resistant to prometryn.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, M. P. and Gronwald, J. 1991. Atrazine resistance in a velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) biotype due to enhanced glutathione-S-transferase activity. Plant Physiol. 96:104109.Google Scholar
Bettini, P., McNally, S., Sevignac, M., Darmency, H., Gasquez, J., and Dron, M. 1987. Atrazine resistance in Chenopodium album . Plant Physiol. 84:14421446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnet, M.W.M., Hildebrand, B., Holtum, J.A.M., and Powles, S. B. 1991. Amitrole, triazine, substituted urea, and metribuzin resistance in a biotype of rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) . Weed Sci. 39:317323.Google Scholar
Burnet, M.W.M., Loveys, B. R., Holtum, J.A.M., and Powles, S. B. 1993. Increased detoxification is a mechanism of simazine resistance in Lolium rigidum. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 46:207218.Google Scholar
Dekker, J. and Duke, S. O. 1995. Herbicide-resistant field crops. Adv. Agron. 54:69116.Google Scholar
De Prado, R., Dominguez, C., and Tena, M. 1989. Characterization of triazine-resistant biotypes of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album), hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis), and yellow foxtail (Setaria glauca) found in Spain. Weed Sci. 37:14.Google Scholar
De Prado, R., Dominguez, C., and Tena, M. 1993. Triazine resistance in biotypes of Solanum nigrum and four Amaranthus species found in Spain. Weed Res. 33:1724.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Al-Khatib, K., Guttieri, M. J., and Fuerst, E. P. 1992. Distribution and characteristics of triazine-resistant Powell amaranth (Amaranthus powellii) in Idaho. Weed Sci. 40:507512.Google Scholar
Gasquez, J., Momemar, A. Al., and Darmency, H. 1985. Triazine herbicide resistance in Chenopodium album L. Occurrence and characteristics of an intermediate biotype. Pestic. Sci. 4:392396.Google Scholar
Gawronski, S. W., Haderlie, L. C., Callihan, R. H., and Gawronska, H. 1986. Mechanism of metribuzin tolerance: herbicide metabolism as a basis for tolerance in potatoes. Weed Res. 26:307314.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., Stoltenberg, D. E., and Balke, N. E. 1995. Absence of herbicide cross-resistance in two atrazine-resistant velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) biotypes. Weed Sci. 43:352357.Google Scholar
Gressel, J., Ammon, H. U., Fodelfors, H., Gaquez, J., Kay, Q.O.N., and Kees, H. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide-resistant weeds outside North America. Pages 3155 In LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Gronwald, J. W. 1994. Resistance to photosystem II inhibiting herbicides. Pages 2760 In Powles, S. B. and Holtum, A. M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
Gronwald, J. W., Andersen, R. N., and Yee, C. 1989. Atrazine resistance in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) due to enhanced atrazine detoxification. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 34:149163.Google Scholar
Habash, D., Percival, M. P., and Baker, N. R. 1985. Rapid fluorescence technique for the study of penetration of photosynthetically active herbicides into leaf tissue. Weed Res. 25:389395.Google Scholar
Holt, J. S., Powles, S. B., and Holtum, J.A.M. 1993. Mechanisms and agronomic aspects of herbicide resistance. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 44:129136.Google Scholar
Khan, S. U., Warwick, S. I., and Marriage, P. B. 1985. Atrazine metabolism in resistant and susceptible biotypes of Chenopodium album L., Chenopodium strictum Roth., and Amaranthus powellii S. Wals. Weed Res. 25:3337.Google Scholar
Marriage, P. B. and Warwick, S. I. 1980. Differential growth and response to atrazine between and within susceptible and resistant biotypes of Chenopodium album L. Weed Res. 20:915.Google Scholar
Moss, S. R. and Rubin, B. 1993. Herbicide-resistant weeds: a worldwide perspective. J. Agric. Sci. 120:141148.Google Scholar
Parks, R. J., Curran, W. S., Roth, G. W., Hartwig, N. L., and Calvin, D. D. 1996. Herbicide susceptibility and biological fitness of triazine-resistant and susceptible common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) . Weed Sci. 44:517522.Google Scholar
Ritter, R. L. and Menbere, H. 1997. Distribution and management of triazine-resistant weeds in the Mid-Atlantic region of the U.S.A. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 5:11471152.Google Scholar
Sereda, B., Erasmus, D. J., and Coetzer, R.L.J. 1996. Resistance of Amaranthus hybridus to atrazine. Weed Res. 36:2130.Google Scholar
Souza Machado, V., Arntzen, C. J., Bandeen, J. P., and Stephenson, G. R. 1978. Comparative triazine effects upon system II photochemistry in chloroplasts of two common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) biotypes. Weed Sci. 26:318322.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. and Foy, C. L. 1988. Distribution of triazine-resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in Virginia. Weed Sci. 36:497499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar