Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T01:31:33.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Micromorphology of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Leaves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Chester G. Mcwhorter ,
Clark Ouzts  and
Rex N. Paul
Chester G. Mcwhorter
Affiliation:
Appl. Tech. Res. Unit
Clark Ouzts
Affiliation:
Appl. Tech. Res. Unit
Rex N. Paul
Affiliation:
Weed Biol. and Mgt. Res. Unit, South. Weed Sci. Lab., USDA-ARS, Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adaxial and abaxial epidermal surfaces of johnsongrass leaves were studied to determine which cells contribute to leaf microroughness. Cork-silica cell (CSC) pairs, three types of prickles, macrohairs, bicellular trichomes, stomata, and ordinary short and long epidermal cells were found and described. CSC pairs made up about 22% of all cells and probably contribute more to microroughness than any other single type because each cork cell produces 11 ± 3 wax filaments that are up to 100 μm long. Bicellular trichomes represented 4 to 5% of the total cells but decreased leaf roughness by secreting a type of mucilage that covers microscopic wax crystals. Stomatal complexes comprised 15 to 18% of all cells and contributed to leaf roughness because they are slightly recessed below the leaf surface. Long prickles occur primarily over veins and represent less than 1% of all cells. Small prickles were present primarily on adaxial surfaces and represent only 3% of all cells. Macrohairs were the largest appendages, 237 ± 104 μm, but they represent far less than 1% of all cells and occur primarily over veins. Ordinary short cells comprised 6 to 13% of all cells. Long cells were most common (41%) of all cells. Short and long cells contribute to leaf roughness because the surface is often convex. A typical johnsongrass leaf may contain more than 25 million appendages on each surface that increase the roughness already caused by epicuticular wax crystals.

Keywords

Johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. # SORHABicellular trichomescork-silica cell pairsCSCmacrohairspricklesstomatawax filamentsleaf pubescenceSORHA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 583 - 589
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Amarasinghe, V. and Watson, L. 1988. Comparative ultrastructure of microhairs in grasses. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 98:303–319.Google Scholar
2. Araus, J. L., Febrero, A., and Vendrell, P. 1991. Epidermal conductance in different parts of durum wheat grown under Mediterranean conditions: the role of epicuticular waxes and stomata. Plant Cell Environ. 14:545–558.Google Scholar
3. Baker, E. A., Hunt, G. M., and Stevens, P.J.G. 1983. Studies of plant cuticle and spray droplet interactions: a fresh approach. Pestic. Sci. 14:645–658.Google Scholar
4. Boize, L., Gudin, C., and Purdue, C. 1976. The influence of leaf surface roughness on the spreading of oil spray drops. Ann. Appl. Biol. 84:205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Borikar, S. T. and Chundurwar, R. D. 1989. Genetic analysis for trichome density in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 14:304–305.Google Scholar
6. Burton, G. W., Hanna, W. W., Johnson, J. C. Jr., Bueck, D. B., Monson, W. G., Powell, J. B., Wells, H. D., and Widstrom, N. W. 1977. Pleiotropic effects of the tr trichomeless gene in pearl millet on transpiration, forage quality, and pest resistance. Crop Sci. 17:613–616.Google Scholar
7. Chambers, G. V., Bulawa, M. C., McWhorter, C. G., and Hanks, J. E. 1992. Use of surface relationship models to predict the spreading of nonaqueous droplets on johnsongrass. Am. Soc. Test. Mat. STP 1112 11:218–246.Google Scholar
8. Cutter, E. G. 1978. Pages 8–21, 94–143, 214–241 in Plant Anatomy. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, London.Google Scholar
9. Dybing, C. D. and Currier, H. B. 1961. Foliar penetration by chemicals. Plant Physiol. 36:169–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Ellis, R. P. 1979. A procedure for standardizing comparative leaf anatomy in the Poaceae. II. The epidermis as seen in surface view. Bothalia 12:641–671.Google Scholar
11. Fahn, A. 1974. Pages 165–198, 235–282 in Plant Anatomy. 2nd ed. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK. 611 pp.Google Scholar
12. Fahn, A. 1988. Tansley review no. 14: Secretory tissue in vascular plants. New Phytol. 108:229–257.Google Scholar
13. Field, R. J. and Bishop, N. G. 1988. Promotion of stomatal infiltration of glyphosate by an organosilicone surfactant reduces the critical rainfall period. Pestic. Sci. 24:55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Gudin, C., Syratt, W. J., and Boize, L. 1976. The mechanisms of photosynthetic inhibition and the development of scorch in tomato plants treated with spray oils. Ann. Appl. Biol. 84:213–219.Google Scholar
15. Hess, F. D., Bayer, D. E., and Falk, R. H. 1974. Herbicide dispersal patterns: I. As a function of leaf surface. Weed Sci. 22:394–401.Google Scholar
16. Jefferson, P. G., Johnson, D. A., and Rumbaugh, M. D. 1988. Genetic analysis of epicuticular wax production in alfalfa. Genome 30:896–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Johnson, H. B. 1975. Plant pubescence: an ecological perspective. Bot. Rev. 41:233–258.Google Scholar
18. Juniper, B. E. and Jeffree, C. E. 1983. The anatomy, ultrastructure, and biosynthesis of the plant surface. Pages 10–36 in Plant Surfaces. Edward Arnold, Ltd., London.Google Scholar
19. Kaufman, P. B., Dayanandan, P., Franklin, C. I., and Takeoka, Y. 1985. Structure and function of silica bodies in the epidermal system of grass shoots. Ann. Bot. 55:487–507.Google Scholar
20. Kaufman, P. B., Petering, L. B., Yocum, C. S., and Baic, D. 1970. Ultrastructural studies on stomata development in internodes of Avena sativa . Am. J. Bot. 57:33–49.Google Scholar
21. Lanning, F. C. and Eleuterius, L. N. 1989. Silica deposition in some C3 and C4 species of grasses, sedges, and composites in the USA. Ann. Bot. 63:395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Martin, J. T. and Juniper, B. E. 1970. Pages 223–253 in The Cuticles of Plants. Edward Arnold, Ltd., London.Google Scholar
23. McWhorter, C. G. 1971. Anatomy of johnsongrass. Weed Sci. 19:385–393.Google Scholar
24. McWhorter, C. G. 1989. History, biology, and control of johnsongrass. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:85–122.Google Scholar
25. McWhorter, C. G. and Paul, R. N. 1989. The involvement of cork-silica cell pairs in the production of wax filaments in johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 37:458–470.Google Scholar
26. McWhorter, C. G., Ouzts, C., and Hanks, J. E. 1993. Spread of water and oil droplets on johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) leaves. Weed Sci. 41:460–467.Google Scholar
27. McWhorter, C. G., Paul, R. N., and Barrentine, W. L. 1990. Morphology, development, and crystallization of epicuticular waxes on johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 38:22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Metcalfe, C. R. 1960. Pages xv–lix in Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. Oxford Univ. Press, London.Google Scholar
29. Ormrod, D. J. and Renney, A. J. 1968. A survey of weed leaf stomata and trichomes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 48:197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Paul, R. N. and McWhorter, C. G. 1990. Correlation of ultrastructure with the mechanism of wax filament production in cork cells in johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.]. Proc. Int. Congr. Elect. Micro. 12:676–677.Google Scholar
31. Paul, R. N., McWhorter, C. G., and Ouzts, J. C. 1992. An investigation into the ultrastructural histochemistry of glandular trichomes of johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.] leaves. Elect. Micro. Soc. Am. 50:842–843.Google Scholar
32. Rodriguez, E., Healey, P. L., and Mehta, I. 1984. Pages 71–94, 133–240 in Biology and Chemistry of Plant Trichomes. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
33. Tischler, C. R. and Voigt, P. W. 1990. Variability in leaf characteristics and water loss in the weeping lovegrass complex. Crop Sci. 30:111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Xu, A., Lu, P., and Wang, X. 1990. Silica cells and silica bodies in vegetative organ of sorghum (Sorghum vulgare Pers.). Acta Agron. Sin. 16:57–64.Google Scholar