Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T06:46:00.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MON 37500 application timing affects cheat (Bromus secalinus) control and winter wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jason P. Kelley  and
Thomas F. Peeper
Jason P. Kelley
Affiliation:
Agronomy Research Station, Building 619, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sixteen field experiments were conducted across Oklahoma to evaluate the effects of MON 37500 time of application on cheat control, and winter wheat injury and yield. Winter wheat injury from MON 37500 applied preemergence (PRE) was slight and was influenced by cumulative precipitation for 10 d after application. Winter wheat injury was more frequent with early vs. late postemergence (POST) applications and was influenced by wheat growth stage and mean, high, and low air temperatures before and after application. Cheat control averaged 75% (n = 16 treatments with four to six replicates) when applied PRE and 88% (n = 126 treatments with four to six replicates) when applied POST. Cheat control from MON 37500 applied POST declined with increasing cheat growth stage at application and with decreasing mean diurnal low temperatures 0 to 14 d and 0 to 21 d before application. MON 37500 applied PRE increased yields 52 and 66% compared with the untreated control in Year 1 and Year 2, averaged over eight experiments each year. MON 37500 applied POST increased wheat yields 68 to 69% compared with the untreated check in Year 1 and Year 2, when averaged over all applications in eight experiments each year. Wheat yields were greater from fall POST applications than from late-winter applications.

Keywords

MON 37500, 1-(2-ethylsulfonylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-3-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)ureacheat, Bromus secalinus L. BROSEhard red winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘2163’, ‘2137’, ‘Jagger’Wheat yieldwheat injuryefficacy variation
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 231 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2000. Maverick product label. St. Louis, MO: Monsanto Company. 63167.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. A., Roberts, J. R., Stone, A. E., and Peeper, T. F. 1999. Survey of farmland utilization, winter annual grass weed infestations and post-harvest wheat stubble burning practices in northcentral Oklahoma. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:216.Google Scholar
Baysinger, J. A. and Sims, B. D. 1991. Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27:562–565.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. and Hamman, W. M. 1998. Control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with MON 37500. Weed Technol. 12:421–425.Google Scholar
Ferreira, K. L., Baker, T. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1990. Factors influencing winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) injury from sulfonuylurea herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:724–730.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W., Stahlman, P. W., Northam, F. E., Miller, S. D., and Hageman, N. R. 1998. MON 37500 rate and timing affects downy brome control in winter wheat. Weed Sci. 46:366–373.Google Scholar
Greer, H., Peeper, T., and Fain, D. 1980. Cheat control in wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:405–410.Google Scholar
Greer, H. L. 1988. Weed survey-southern United States, grass crop subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:408.Google Scholar
Kirkland, K. J. 1993. Spring wheat growth and yield as influenced by duration of wild oat competition. Weed Technol. 7:890–893.Google Scholar
Runyan, T. J., McNeil, W. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1982. Differential tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 30:94–97.Google Scholar
Scott, R. C., Peeper, T. F., and Koscelny, J. A. 1995. Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) response to winter annual broadleaf weed control. Weed Technol. 9:594–598.Google Scholar
Stahlman, P. W. and Geier, P. W. 2000. MON 37500 application timing affects downy brome and winter wheat response. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 53:43.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T., and Konzak, C. F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14:415–421.Google Scholar