Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T20:50:14.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential for Adventitious Regeneration of Selected Weed Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Vernon B. Langston ,
Thomas R. Harger  and
Paulette S. Johnsey
Vernon B. Langston
Affiliation:
Dept. Plant Path. and Crop Physiol., Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Thomas R. Harger
Affiliation:
Dept. Plant Path. and Crop Physiol., Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Paulette S. Johnsey
Affiliation:
Dept. Plant Path. and Crop Physiol., Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The potential of several common weed species to produce adventitious shoots when the plants were excised approximately 1.0 cm below the cotyledonary node at the cotyledon growth stage and at the four true-leaf stage is reported. Indian jointvetch (Aeschynomene indica L. ♯3 AESIN), northern jointvetch [Aeschynomene virginica (L.) B.S.P. ♯ AESVI], and wild poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla L. ♯ EPHHL) produced adventitious shoots at both growth stages after shoot excision. Adventitious and vegetative regeneration of wild poinsettia damaged by herbicides was similar to that from decapitation.

Keywords

Aeschynomene indicaAeschynomene virginicaEuphorbia heterophyllaherbicide toleranceAESINAESVIEPHHL
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , May 1984 , pp. 360 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adams, J. 1924. Adventitious shoots on hypocotyl of flax and tomato. Bot. Gaz. 78:461–462.Google Scholar
2. Bain, H. F. 1940. Origin of adventitious shoots in decapitated cranberry seedlings. Bot. Gaz. 101:872–881.Google Scholar
3. Crooks, D. M. 1933. Histological and regenerative studies on the flax seedling. Bot. Gaz. 95:209–239.Google Scholar
4. Mendel, K. 1938. A case of regeneration of the growing point at the hypocotyl. Palest. J. Bot. Rehovot Ser. 2:89–92.Google Scholar
5. Raju, M.V.S. 1975. Experimental studies on leaf spurge (Euphorbia sula L.). I. Ontogeny and distribution of buds and shoots on the hypocotyl. Bot. Gaz. 136:254–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Raju, M.V.S., Coupland, R. T., and Steeves, T. A. 1966. On the occurrence of root buds on the perennial plants in Saskatchewan. Can. J. Bot. 44:33–37.Google Scholar
7. Rauh, W. 1937. Die bildung von hypocotyl- und werzelsprossen und ihre bedeutung für die wuchsformen der Pflanzen. Nova Acta Leopold. N.F. 4:395–553.Google Scholar
8. Roeper, J. 1824. Enumeratio Euphorbiarum. Typis Caroli Eduardi Rosenbusch. Göttingae. 71 pp.Google Scholar