Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T11:40:28.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Turkey Oak to 2,4,5-T as a Function of Final Formulation Oil Content

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. P. Upchurch ,
J. A. Keaton  and
H. D. Coble
R. P. Upchurch
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina Agricultural Division, Monsanto Co., St. Louis, Mo.
J. A. Keaton
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina Elanco Products Co., Raleigh, N. C.
H. D. Coble
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Shoots of naturally established specimens of turkey oak (Quercus laevis Walt.) 3 to 6 ft high were treated with 4 to 8 lb aehg of a commercial concentrate formulation of the butoxyethanol ester of (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4,5-T) on or about May 1, June 1, July 1, August 1, and September 1. Foliar applications were made to the point of run-off and foliar-basal treatments were made first to the basal 8 inches of the main stem and then to the lower four-fifths of the remainder of the shoot. The objective was to assess the utility of number two diesel fuel as an additive for such treatments when the oil was used at rates of 0, 5, 10, and 20% in the final formulations. The experiment was repeated in 3 different years. Responses measured approximately 11, 14, and 23 months after initial treatment were percent control of original shoots, percent control of new shoots, shoot height, and number of live stems/plant. Foliar treatments without oil were progressively less effective as they were made later in the growing season. The addition of oil to foliar treatments provided more effective control of the original shoots and greater reduction in shoot heights, especially when the oil concentration was 20%. The foliar-basal method was notably ineffective in the absence of oil. Addition of oil to the foliar-basal treatments provided marked improvement in the original shoot, total shoot control index, shoot height, and stems/plant responses, especially at the 20% level of oil. Diesel fuel is useful as an additive for 2,4,5-T sprays to be applied to turkey oak, especially where treatment is to be made in the latter half of the growing season and in particular where the lower stems can be treated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , October 1969 , pp. 505 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beatty, R. H. 1953. Brush Control. Status of chemical methods. J. Agr. Food Chem. 1:178–181.Google Scholar
2. Beatty, R. H. 1957. General aspects of brush control. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 10:18–25.Google Scholar
3. Bramble, W. C., Byrnes, W. R., and Worley, D. P. 1957. Effects of certain common brush control techniques and materials on game food and cover on a power line right-of-way. Pennsylvania State Univ. Prog. Rep. 175, no. 4. 4 p.Google Scholar
4. Burton, G. W. and Hughes, R. H. 1961. Effects of burning and 2,4,5-T on gallberry and saw-palmetto. J. Forest. 59:497–500.Google Scholar
5. Carter, M. C. and Chappell, W. E. 1957. The effect of carrier, formulation of phytocide, and time of treatment on the percentage kill of certain woody plants. Proc. North East. Weed Contr. Conf. 11:209–218.Google Scholar
6. Crafts, A. S. 1953. Herbicides. Their absorption and translocation. J. Agr. Food Chem. 1:51–55.Google Scholar
7. Crafts, A. S. and Reiber, H. G. 1948. Herbicidal properties of oils. Hilgardia 18:77–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Coulter, L. L. 1954. Some aspects of right-of-way brush control with 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D. Weeds 3:21–27.Google Scholar
9. Coulter, L. L. 1959. Forron. New formulations solve problem of additional oil in spray mixture. Down to Earth 15(1):2.Google Scholar
10. Currier, H. B. and Dybing, C. D. 1959. Foliar penetration of herbicides—Review and present status. Weeds 7:195–213.Google Scholar
11. Farmer, J. D. 1960. Programming right of way brush control. Down to Earth 15(4): 19–20.Google Scholar
12. Hay, J. R. 1956. Translocation of herbicides in marabu. I. Translocation of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid following application to the bark or to cut-surfaces of stumps. Weeds 4:218–226.Google Scholar
13. Keaton, J. A. and Upchurch, R. P. 1964. The influence of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T) on Quercus laevis . Proc. So. Weed Conf. 17:284. (Abstr.) Google Scholar
14. Leonard, O. A. 1953. High volume application of herbicide to sprouting and seedling chamise. Proc. California Weed Conf. 14:43–53.Google Scholar
15. Leonard, O. A. 1958. Studies on the absorption and translocation of 2,4-D in bean plants. Hilgardia 28:115–139.Google Scholar
16. Leonard, O. A. and Carlson, C. E. 1955. Chemical brush control techniques on California range lands. California Div. of Forest Prog. Rep. (unnumbered). 12 p.Google Scholar
17. Leonard, O. A. and Harvey, W. A. 1956. Chemical control of woody plants in California. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 755. 40 p.Google Scholar
18. Romancier, R. M. 1965. 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, and related chemicals for woody plant control in the Southeastern United States. Georgia Forest Res. Coun. Rep. 16. 46 p.Google Scholar
19. Southwick, L. 1950. Recent developments in chemical brush control. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 3:150–159.Google Scholar
20. van Overbeek, J. and Blondeau, R. 1954. Mode of action of phytotoxic oils. Weeds 3:55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Walker, L. C. 1956. Controlling undesirable hardwoods. Georgia Forest Res. Coun. Rep. (unnumbered). 24 p.Google Scholar
22. Willard, C. J. 1957. Chemical control of woody plants. Ohio State Univ. Bull. 364. 31 p.Google Scholar
23. Young, V. A., Fisher, C. E., Darrow, R. A., McCully, W. G., and Young, D. W. 1951. Recent developments in the chemical control of brush on Texas ranges. Texas Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 721. 19 p.Google Scholar