Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Responses of Contemporary and Historical Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) Accessions to Glyphosate

  • Dean S. Volenberg (a1), William L. Patzoldt (a1), Aaron G. Hager (a1) and Patrick J. Tranel (a1)

Abstract

Anecdotal reports suggest waterhemp is becoming more difficult to control with glyphosate. Waterhemp accessions collected primarily in Illinois before 1996, in 1998 to 1999, and in 2003, were evaluated for differential responses to glyphosate treatment. The pre-1996 group consisted of 10 accessions, whereas the 1998 to 1999 and 2003 groups consisted of 45 accessions each. Plants 10 to 12 cm in height from each waterhemp accession were treated with 0 or 220 g ae ha−1 glyphosate. Although shoot dry biomass 14 d after treatment, expressed as a percentage of the untreated, varied within and among accessions, the mean responses of the three groups were similar. However, when glyphosate responses were divided into 10 arbitrary classes (0 to 10, 11 to 20, …, and 81 to 90; > 91% of untreated), the number of plants within each class differed among groups. Most notably, the proportion of plants in the range of 0 to 30% of the untreated control decreased with time when progressing from the pre-1996 to the 2003 accessions. The relative frequency of waterhemp plants that were ≥ 100% of the untreated plants (i.e., uninjured by glyphosate) in the pre-1996, 1998 to 1999, and 2003 groups were 5, 6, and 5%, respectively. In a separate trial, waterhemp populations that exhibited the least sensitivity to glyphosate at 220 g ha−1 were controlled by 870 g ha−1 glyphosate. These results suggest that waterhemp, as a whole, within Illinois has not become less sensitive to glyphosate over the past few years. However, the proportion of plants that are most sensitive to glyphosate may be decreasing within populations.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail: dean.volenberg@ces.uwex.edu

References

Hide All
Costea, M. and Tardif, F. J. Conspectus and notes on the genus Amaranthus (Amaranthaceae) in Canada. Rhodora. 2003. 105:260281.
Costea, M., Weaver, S. E., and Tardif, F. J. The biology of invasive alien plants in Canada, 3: Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer var. rudis (Sauer) Costea & Tardif. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2005. 85:507522.
Fisher, R. A. Statistical Methods for Research Workers 1970. Edinburgh Oliver and Boyd. Pages 78113.
Gressel, J. Molecular Biology of Weed Control 2002. New York Taylor and Francis. Pages 115117.
Gronwald, J. W. 1994. Resistance to photosystem II inhibiting herbicides. Pages 2760. in Powles, S.B., Holtum, J.A.M. eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL Lewis.
Hager, A. G., Wax, L. M., Stoller, E. W., and Bollero, G. A. 2002. Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in soybean. Weed Sci. 50:607610.
Hartzler, B., Kolln, J., and Refsell, D. 2002. Variable Glyphosate Tolerance in Iowa Waterhemp. http://www.weeds.iastate.edu.
Hartzler, R. G., Battles, B. A., and Nordby, D. 2004. Effect of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) emergence date on growth and fecundity in soybean. Weed Sci. 52:242245.
Heap, I. M. 2006. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.com.
Hinz, J. R. R. and Owen, M. D. K. 1997. Acetolactate synthase resistance in a common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) population. Weed Technol. 11:1318.
Horak, M. J. and Peterson, D. E. 1995. Biotypes of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) are resistant to imazethapyr and thifensulfuron. Weed Technol. 9:192195.
Horak, M. J. and Loughin, T. M. 2000. Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species. Weed Sci. 48:347355.
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service 1996. Agricultural Chemical Usage: 1996 Fields Crops Summary. http://www.nass.usda.gov.
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service 1997. Agricultural Chemical Usage: 1997 Fields Crops Summary. http://www.nass.usda.gov.
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service 2000. Agricultural Chemical Usage: 2000 Fields Crops Summary. http://www.nass.usda.gov.
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service 2003. Agricultural Chemical Usage: 2003 Fields Crops Summary. http://www.nass.usda.gov.
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service 2004. Agricultural Chemical Usage: 2004 Fields Crops Summary. http://www.nass.usda.gov.
Owen, M. D. K. and Zelaya, I. A. 2005. Herbicide-resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides. Pest. Manag. Sci. 61:301311.
Patzoldt, W. L., Dixon, B. S., and Tranel, P. J. 2003. Triazine resistance in Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq) Sauer that is not site-of-action mediated. Pest Manag. Sci. 59:11341142.
Patzoldt, W. L., Tranel, P. J., and Hager, A. G. 2002. Variable herbicide response among Illinois waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis and A. tuberculatus) populations. Crop. Prot. 21:707712.
Patzoldt, W. L., Tranel, P. J., and Hager, A. G. 2005. A waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) biotype with multiple resistance across three herbicide sites of action. Weed Sci. 53:3036.
Pratt, D. B. and Clark, L. G. 2001. Amaranthus rudis and Amaranthus tuberculatus—one species or two? J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 128:282296.
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Thill, D. C. 1994. Resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides. Pages 83140. in Powles, S.B., Holtum, J.A.M. eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL Lewis.
Shoup, D. E., Al-Khatib, K., and Peterson, D. E. 2003. Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistance to protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. 51:145150.
Smeda, R. J. and Schuster, C. L. 2002. Differential sensitivity to glyphosate among biotypes of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis Sauer). Pages 630633. in Spafford, J.H., Dodd, J., Moore, J.H., eds. 13th Australian Weeds Conference. Perth, Australia Shannon Books.
Sprague, C. L., Stoller, E. W., and Wax, L. M. 1997. Response of an acetolactate synthase (ALS)-resistant biotype of Amaranthus rudis to selected ALS-inhibiting and alternative herbicides. Weed. Res. 37:93101.
Steckel, L. E. and Sprague, C. L. 2004. Late-season common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in narrow- and wide-row soybean. Weed Technol. 18:947952.
Trucco, F., Jeschke, M. R., Rayburn, A. L., and Tranel, P. J. 2005. Promiscuity in weedy amaranths: high frequency of female tall waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) × smooth pigweed (A. hybridus) hybridization under field conditions. Weed Sci. 53:4654.
University of Missouri 2005. Waterhemp Potentially Resistant to Herbicide Found in Northwest Missouri Soybean Fields. http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org.
Volenberg, D. S. and Stoltenberg, D. E. 2002. Altered acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase confers resistance to clethodim, fluazifop, and sethoxydim in Wisconsin giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm.) and large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop]. Weed Res. 42:342350.
Young, B. G. 2006. Changes in herbicide use patterns and production practices resulting from glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol. 20:301307.
Zelaya, I. A. and Owen, D. K. 2005. Differential response of Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq ex DC) JD Sauer to glyphosate. Pest Manag. Sci. 61:936950.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Science
  • ISSN: 0043-1745
  • EISSN: 1550-2759
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed