Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T12:07:15.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selectivity of Nitrofen and Oxyfluorfen Between Portulaca oleracea Ecotypes and Two Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) Cultivars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

S. F. Gorske
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
H. J. Hopen
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801

Abstract

A collection of common purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) ecotypes from various locations around the world was assembled at the University of Illinois. Applications of nitrofen (2,4-dichlorophenyl-p-nitrophenyl ether) to the various ecotypes showed that 3 of the 26 ecotypes [India, Mexico, and Florida (Sanford)] exhibited some degree of tolerance. This marginal tolerance rapidly disappeared as the rate of nitrofen increased beyond 0.56 kg/ha. All of the ecotypes tested were susceptible to applications of oxyfluorfen [2-chloro-2-(3-ethoxy-4-nitrophenoxy)-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzene]. Oxyfluorfen was toxic to common purslane plants at rates as low as 5 g/ha. Treatment of ‘Hybelle’ (tolerant) and ‘Rio Verde’ (susceptible) cabbage (Brassica olerace var. capitata L.) cultivars with 3.36 kg/ha nitrofen reduced plant fresh weight to 82% and 62%, respectively, of control. Oxyfluorfen at 0.15 kg/ha reduced fresh weight to 60% and 27% for Hybelle and Rio Verde, respectively. Applications of nitrofen at 3.36 kg/ha reduced plant fresh weight in Hybelle the same amount as 100 g/ha oxyfluorfen and 70 g/ha in Rio Verde.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1971. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv. Dover. Common weeds of the United States, 463 pp.Google Scholar
2. Bell, A. R., Nalewaja, J. D., and Schooler, A. B. 1972. Response of kochia selections to 2,4-D, dicamba, and picloram. Weed Sci. 20:458461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Hopen, J. H. 1969. Selectivity of nitrofen between cabbage cultivars. HortScience 4:119120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hopen, H. J., Splittstoesser, W. E., and Butler, J. D., 1966. Intraspecies bentgrass selectivity of siduron. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 89:631635.Google Scholar
5. Hopen, H. J. and Splittstoesser, W. E. 1968. Varietal differences in response to herbicides. Illinois Res. 10:19.Google Scholar
6. McWhorter, C. G. and Jordan, T. N. 1976. Comparative morphological development of six johnsongrass ecotypes. Weed Sci. 24:270275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Pereira, J. F., Hopen, H. J., and Splittstoesser, W. E. 1972. Cabbage response to fluorodifen and nitrofen under field conditions. HortScience 7:6676.Google Scholar
8. Pereira, H. F., Splittstoesser, W. E., and Hopen, H. J. 1971. Mechanism of intraspecific selectivity of cabbage to nitrofen. Weed Sci. 19:647651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Singh, K. P. 1973. Effects of temperature and light on seed germination of two ecotypes of Portulaca oleracea L. New Phytol. 72:289295.Google Scholar
10. Stino, K. R. and El-Shehedi, A. A. 1952. Cytogenetic studies on Portulaca oleracea L. Fouad I. Univ., Bulletin #17. 21 pp.Google Scholar
11. Vengris, J., Dunn, S., and Stacewicz-Sapuncakis, M. 1972. Life history studies as related to weed control in the northeast 7-Common Purslane. Agric. Exp. Stn., Coll. Food Nat. Res. Univ. of Massachusetts. 44 pp.Google Scholar
12. Whitworth, J. W. 1964. The reaction of strains of field bindweed to 2,4-D. Weeds 12:5758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar