Skip to main content Accessibility help

Stacked Crop Rotations Exploit Weed-Weed Competition for Sustainable Weed Management

  • Andrew J. Garrison (a1), Adam D. Miller (a2), Matthew R. Ryan (a3), Stephen H. Roxburgh (a4) and Katriona Shea (a1)...


Crop rotation has long been considered one of the simplest and most effective tools for managing weeds. In this paper, we demonstrate how crop rotations can be strategically arranged to harness a novel mechanism of weed suppression: weed-weed competition. Specifically, we consider how crop stacking, or increasing the number of consecutive plantings of a single crop within a rotation, can decrease the size of the weed seed bank, by forcing weeds to compete with each other in similar environments for longer periods of time, while still reaping the traditional benefits of crop rotation. Using an annual plant model, we investigate the theoretical effects of stacked crop rotations on weeds that have different life-history strategies and phenology. Our results show that when weeds compete within a season, stacking can reduce the weed seed bank compared to rotations without stacked crops. Although more research is needed to fully understand the effects of crop stacking on other aspects of the system, such as insect pests and diseases, our research suggests that crop stacking has the potential to improve weed suppression without additional inputs, and their associated costs and externalities. More generally, improving management by changing the temporal arrangement of disturbances is a novel, process-based approach that could likely be applied to other weed management practices, such as mowing and herbicide application, and which could involve mechanisms other than weed-weed competition. Leveraging this new application of existing ecological theory to improve weed management strategies holds great promise.


Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail:


Hide All
Anderson, RL (2004) Sequencing crops to minimize selection pressure for weeds in the Central Great Plains. Weed Technol 18:157164
Anderson, RL (2005) A multi-tactic approach to manage weed population dynamics in crop rotations. Agron J. 97:15791583
Anderson, RL (2009) A 2-year small grain interval reduces need for herbicides in no-till soybean. Weed Technol 23:398403
Bastiaans, L, Paolini, R, Baumann, DT (2008) Focus on ecological weed management: what is hindering adoption? Weed Res 48:481491
Beck, D (2003) An Emphasis on Rotations. Accessed August 3, 2012
Bohan, DA, Powers, SJ, Champion, G, Haughton, AJ, Hawes, C, Squire, G, Cussans, J, Mertens, SK (2011) Modeling rotations: can crop sequences explain arable weed seedbank abundance? Weed Res 51:422432
Booth, BD, Swanton, CJ (2002) Assembly theory applied to weed communities. Weed Sci. 50:213
Burnside, OC, Wilson, RG, Weisberg, S, Hubbard, KG (1996) Seed longevity of 41 weed species buried 17 years in eastern and western Nebraska. Weed Sci. 44:7486
Chesson, P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Ann Rev Ecol System 31:343366
Clay, SA, Kleinjan, J, Clay, DE, Forcella, F, Batchelor, W (2005) Growth and fecundity of several weed species in corn and soybean. Agron J. 97:294302
Davis, AS, Hill, JD, Chase, CA, Johanns, AM, Liebman, M (2012) Increasing cropping system diversity balances productivity, profitability and environmental health. PLoS ONE 7:e47149
Davis, AS, Renner, KA, Dyer, L, Mutch, D (2005) Integrated weed management guide: One year's seedling. East Lansing, MI Michigan State University Extension. 112 p
Derksen, DA, Anderson, RL, Blackshaw, RE, Maxwell, B (2002) Weed dynamics and management strategies for cropping systems in the Northern Great Plains. Agron J. 94:174185
Doucet, C, Weaver, SE, Hamill, AS, Zhang, J (1999) Separating the effects of crop rotation from weed management on weed density and diversity. Weed Sci. 47:729735
Ellner, S (1985) ESS germination strategies in randomly varying environments. II. Reciprocal Yield-Law models. Theoretical Popul Biol. 28:80116
Eyre, MD, Critchley, CNR, Leifert, C, Wilcockson, SJ (2011) Crop sequence, crop protection and fertility management effects on weed cover in an organic/conventional farm management trial. Europ J Agron 34:153162
Gallandt, E (2009) Managing Weeds With Crop Rotation. Accessed August 3, 2012
Garrison, A, Miller, AD, Roxburgh, SH, Shea, K (2012) More bang for the land manager's buck: disturbance autocorrelation can be used to achieve management objectives at no additional cost. J App Ecol 49:10201027
Hagny, M (2001) Stand tall with stacked rotations. Leading Edge: The Journal of No-Till Agriculture 1:1317
Leighty, CE (1938) Crop rotation. Pp 406430 in Patrick, AL, ed. Soils and Men: Yearbook of Agriculture 1938. Washington, DC USDA, Government Printing Office
Liebman, M, Davis, AS (2000) Integration of soil, crop and weed management in low-external-input farming systems. Weed Res 40:2747
Liebman, M, Gallandt, ER (1997) Many little hammers: ecological management of crop-weed interactions. Pp 291343 in Jackson, LE, ed. Ecology in Agriculture. San Diego, CA Academic Press
Liebman, M, Staver, CP (2001) Crop diversification for weed management. Chapter 7 in Liebman, M, Mohler, CL, Staver, CP eds. Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds. Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Maxwell, BD, O'Donovan, JT (2007) Understanding weed-crop interactions to manage weed problems. Pp 1734 in Upadhyaya, MK, Blackshaw, RE, eds. Non-Chemical Weed Management: Principles, Concepts, and Technology. Oxfordshire, UK CAB International
McCloskey, MC, Firbank, LG, Watkinson, AR, Webb, DJ (1998) Interactions between weeds of winter wheat under different fertilizer, cultivation and weed management treatments. Weed Res 38:1124
Mertens, SK, van den Bosch, F, Heesterbeek, J (2002) Weed populations and crop rotations: exploring dynamics of a structured periodic system. Ecol Appl 12:11251141
Miller, AD, Chesson, P (2009) Coexistence in disturbance prone communities: how a resistance-resilience trade-off generates coexistence via the storage effect. Amer Natural 173:E30E43
Miller, AD, Reilly, D, Bauman, S, Shea, K (2012b) Interactions between frequency and size of disturbance affect competitive outcomes. Ecol Res 27:783791
Miller, AD, Roxburgh, SH, Shea, K (2011) How frequency and intensity shape diversity-disturbance relationships. Proc National Acad Sci. 108:56435648
Miller, AD, Roxburgh, SH, Shea, K (2012a) Timing of disturbance alters competitive outcomes and mechanisms of coexistence in an annual plant model. Theor Ecol 5:419432
Mohler, CL (2009) The role of crop rotation in weed management. Pp 4446 in Mohler, CL, Johnson, SE, eds. Crop Rotation on Organic Farms. A Planning Manual. Ithaca, NY Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service
Munier-Jolain, NM, Chauvel, B, Gasquez, J (2002) Long-term modelling of weed control strategies: analysis of threshold-based options for weed species with contrasted competitive abilities. Weed Res 42:107122
Nord, EA, Ryan, MR, Curran, WS, Mortensen, DA, Mirsky, SB (2012) Effects of management type and timing on weed suppression in soybean no-till planted into rolled-crimped cereal rye. Weed Sci. 60:624633
Olsen, JM, Griepentrog, H-W, Nielsen, J, Weiner, J. (2012) How important are crop spatial pattern and density for weed suppression by spring wheat? Weed Sci. 60:501509
Pickett, S, White, P (1985) The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. New York, NY Academic. 472 p
Radosevich, SR (1987) Methods to study interactions among crops and weeds. Weed Techno 1:190198
Roxburgh, SH, Shea, K, Wilson, JB (2004) The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence. Ecology. 85:359371
Ryan, MR, Smith, RG, Mirsky, SB, Mortensen, DA, Seidel, R (2010) Management filters and species traits: weed community assembly in long-term organic and conventional systems. Weed Sci. 58:265277
Schreiber, MM (1992) Influence of tillage, crop rotation, and weed management on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) population dynamics and corn yield. Weed Sci. 40:645653
Shea, K, Roxburgh, SH, Rauschert, ESJ (2004) Moving from pattern to process: coexistence mechanisms under intermediate disturbance regimes. Ecol Letters 7:491508
Shinozaki, K, Kira, T (1956) Intraspecific competition among higher plants VII. Logistic theory of the CD effect. J Instit Polytech Series D 7:3572
Storkey, J, Moss, SR, Cussans, JW (2010) Using assembly theory to explain changes in a weed flora in response to agricultural intensification. Weed Sci. 58:3946
Weiner, J, Andersen, SB, Wille, WK-M, Griepentrog, H-W, Olsen, JM (2010) Evolutionary agroecology: the potential for cooperative, high density, weed suppressing cereals. Evolut Appl 3:473479
Westerman, PR, Liebman, M, Menalled, E, Heggenstaller, AH, Hartzler, RG, Dixon, PM (2005) Are many little hammers effective? Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) population dynamics in two- and four-year crop rotation systems. Weed Sci. 53:382392
Zhang, R, Shea, K (2012) Integrating multiple disturbance aspects: management of an invasive thistle, Carduus nutans . Ann Botany 110:13951401


Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Garrison et al. supplementary material

 Word (20 KB)
20 KB
Supplementary materials

Garrison et al. supplementary material
Figure A1

 Unknown (389 KB)
389 KB
Supplementary materials

Garrison et al. supplementary material
Figure A2

 Unknown (342 KB)
342 KB
Supplementary materials

Garrison et al. supplementary material
Figure A3

 PDF (105 KB)
105 KB

Stacked Crop Rotations Exploit Weed-Weed Competition for Sustainable Weed Management

  • Andrew J. Garrison (a1), Adam D. Miller (a2), Matthew R. Ryan (a3), Stephen H. Roxburgh (a4) and Katriona Shea (a1)...


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.