Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T04:09:30.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Volunteer Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa pratensis) Control in Kentucky Bluegrass Seed Fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. O. Lee
W. O. Lee*
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Crop Sci. Dep., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The carbon banding technique was evaluated for control of volunteer Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) while Kentucky bluegrass was established for seed production. At Madras, Oregon, where terbacil (3-tert-butyl-5-chloro-6-methyluracil), diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine], and simazine [2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine] were applied at several rates each, volunteer Kentucky bluegrass control between the carbon bands ranged from 80 to 99+%. At Corvallis, Oregon, where Colonial bentgrass (Agrostis tenuis Sibth. ‘Highland’), red fescue (Festuca rubra L. ‘Pennlawn’), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. ‘NK-100’), and orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L. ‘S-143’) were planted to allow identification of volunteer Kentucky bluegrass both between and in the carbon bands, diuron, atrazine, and a combination of diuron and terbacil eliminated volunteer Kentucky bluegrass. Terbacil did not control all Kentucky bluegrass between the bands. None of the herbicide treatments adversely affected crop establishment or seed yield.

Keywords

Seed productionherbicidesweed control
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 26 , Issue 6 , November 1978 , pp. 675 - 678
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Crocker, W. 1938. Life span of seeds. Bot. Rev. 4:235–274.Google Scholar
2. Duvel, J. W. T. 1905. The vitality of buried seed. U.S. Bur. Plant Ind. Bull. 83.22 pp.Google Scholar
3. Goss, W. L. 1924. The vitality of buried seed. J. Agric. Res. 29:349–362.Google Scholar
4. Lee, W. O. 1973. Clean grass seed crops established with activated carbon bands and herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:537–541.Google Scholar
5. Rampton, H. H. and Ching, Te May. 1966. Longevity and dormancy in seeds of several cool season grasses and legumes buried in soil. Agron. J. 58:220–223.Google Scholar
6. Rampton, H. H. and Ching, Te May. 1972. Persistence of crop seed in soil. Agron. J. 62:272–277.Google Scholar
7. Roberts, H. A. and Feast, Patricia M. 1972. Fate of seeds of some annual weeds in different depths of cultivated soils and undisturbed soils. Weed Res. 12:316–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Roberts, H. A. and Feast, Patricia M. 1973. Emergence and longevity of seeds of annual weeds in cultivated and uncultivated soils. J. Appl. Ecol. 10:133–143.Google Scholar
9. Toole, E. H. and Brown, E. 1946. Final results of the Duvel buried seed experiments. J. Agric. Res., Washington, D.C. 72:201–109.Google Scholar