Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T04:13:24.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Volunteer potato interference in carrot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Martin M. Williams II  and
Rick A. Boydston
Rick A. Boydston
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Vegetable and Forage Crops Research, Prosser, WA 99350
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed management systems in carrot are limited in part by a lack of fundamental understanding of crop–weed interactions. Irrigated field studies were conducted to quantify the effect of volunteer potato density and duration of interference on carrot yield and to determine relationships among weed density, duration of weed growth, and volunteer potato tuber production. A season-long volunteer potato density of 0.06 plants m−2 produced from 150 to 230 g tubers m−2 and resulted in an estimated 5% crop yield loss. At two volunteer potato plants m−2, the same level of crop loss was estimated with a duration of interference of 430 growing degree days (GDD), a time at which the weed had already produced 130 g tubers m−2. Volunteer potato height at the time of weed removal predicted carrot yield loss (R2 = 0.77) and may be useful for timing of management strategies such as hand weeding. Functional relationships describing carrot–volunteer potato interactions provide simple information that is useful for developing weed management recommendations for carrot, a crop that relies on multiple tactics for managing weeds, and rotational crops that are negatively affected by persistence of volunteer potato.

Keywords

Volunteer potato, Solanum tuberosum L. ‘Russet Burbank’carrot, Daucus carota L. ‘PS-104395’Competitioncritical time of weed removalcritical weed-free periodeconomic thresholdyield loss
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 2006 , pp. 94 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2002. Pacific Northwest Weed Management Handbook. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 420 p.Google Scholar
Bell, C. E., Boutwell, B. E., Ogbuchiekwe, E. J., and McGiffen, M. E. Jr. 2000. Weed control in carrots: the efficacy and economic value of linuron. Hortscience 35:1089–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellinder, R. R., Kirkwyland, J. J., and Wallace, R. W. 1997. Carrot (Daucus carota) and weed response to linuron and metribuzin applied at different crop stages. Weed Technol 11:235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydston, R. A. 2001. Volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) control with herbicides and cultivation in field corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 15:461–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydston, R. A. and Seymour, M. D. 1996. Volunteer potato control in carrots with glyphosate. WSWS Res. Prog. Rep. P. 22.Google Scholar
Boydston, R. A. and Seymour, M. D. 2002. Volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) control with herbicides and cultivation in onion (Allium cepa). Weed Technol 16:620–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydston, R. A. and Williams, M. M. II. 2003. Effect of soil fumigation on volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber viability. Weed Technol 17:352–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydston, R. A. and Williams, M. M. II. 2005. Managing volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) in field corn with mesotrione and arthropod herbivory. Weed Technol 19:443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardina, J., Webster, T. M., Herms, C. P., and Regnier, E. E. 1999. Development of weed IPM: levels of integration for weed management. Pages 239–267 in Buhler, D. D. ed. Expanding the Context of Weed Management. New York: Hawthorn Press.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol 107:239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogelberg, F. 1999. Night-time soil cultivation and intra-row brush weeding for weed control in carrots (Daucus carota L). Biol. Agric. Hortic 17:31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, K. I. N., Doohan, D. J., and Specht, E. G. 2004. Response of processing carrot to metribuzin on mineral soils in Nova Scotia. Can. J. Plant Sci 84:669–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., Blankenship, E. E., Van Acker, R. C., and Lindquist, J. L. 2002. Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci 50:773–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroux, G. D., Benoît, D. L., and Banville, S. 1996. Effect of crop rotations on weed control, Bidens cernua and Erigeron canadensis populations, and carrot yields in organic soils. Crop Protect 15:171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., Clay, S. A., Schmenk, R., Kells, J. J., Howatt, K., and Westra, P. 1996. Stability of corn (Zea mays)–velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference relationships. Weed Sci 44:309–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mojtahedi, H., Boydston, R. A., Thomas, P. E., Crosslin, J. M., Santo, G. S., Riga, E., and Anderson, T. L. 2003. Weed hosts of Paratrichodorus allius and tobacco rattle virus in the Pacific Northwest. Am. J. Potato Res 80:379–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perombelon, M. C. M. 1975. Observations on the survival of potato groundskeepers in Scotland. Potato Res 18:205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratkowsky, D. A. 1983. Nonlinear Regression Modeling: A Unified Practical Approach. New York: Marcel Dekker. Pp. 135–153.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. E. 1983. Sources and dissemination of potato viruses in the Columbia Basin of the Northwestern United States. Plant Dis 67:744–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, R. E., Newberry, G. D., Joy, D., Hyde, G., and Schotzko, T. 2001. Potato volunteer project. Pages 189–239 in Progress Reports 2001. Moses Lake, WA: Washington State Potato Commission.Google Scholar
Van Heemst, H. D. J. 1985. The influence of weed competition on crop yield. Agric. Syst 18:81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
William, R. D. and Warren, G. F. 1975. Competition between purple nutsedge and vegetables. Weed Sci 23:317–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. M. II and Boydston, R. A. 2002. Effect of shoot removal during tuberization on volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber production. Weed Technol 16:617–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. M. II and Boydston, R. A. Alternative to hand weeding volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) in carrot (Daucus carota). Weed Technol 19:1050–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. M. II, Ransom, C. V., and Thompson, W. M. 2004a. Effect of volunteer potato density on bulb onion yield and quality. Weed Sci 52:754–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. M. II, Ransom, C. V., and Thompson, W. M. 2005. Duration of volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) interference in bulb onion. Weed Sci 53:62–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. M. II, Walsh, D. B., and Boydston, R. A. 2004b. Integrating arthropod herbivory and reduced herbicide use for weed management. Weed Sci 52:1018–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar